Monthly Archive for April, 2005

Hey Perv! Yeah, You!

Google_search

The patriarchy-blaming blog is, ironically, a common destination for Google porn searches. The huge number of pervs looking for “mutilated women” and “corpse porn” is arresting, but I didn’t just roll off the Twisty truck yesterday, so it doesn’t surprise me. Other popular searches include assorted vulgarities that I appropriate from male supremacist discourse to amplify my limping rhetorical whispers. Strung together in a Google search field, stripped of their patriarchy-blaming context, the zeitgeist of the internet imbues them with a throbbing crassness:

Head Up Ass
Super + Fucking
USSR 12 BORE DELUXE MODEL GUN

I mention all this because today, nestled among the old blog stats, there was a string of search words so sad, so delusional, that I can’t even begin to describe the hairball of ick that gagged me as I read it: “beautiful girls lovingly showing their vaginas.”

I so blame the patriarchy for the existence in even one insane human brain so repellent a conflation of conflicting concepts! It would have just been run-of-the-mill misogyny except for the inclusion of the word ‘lovingly.’ Lovingly! Lovingly shoots it up to the top floor of Misogyny Tower. Doesn’t this knob know that love means never having to show your vagina to greasy creeps on the internet?

Another thing I blame the patriarchy for is that the language of patriarchy-blaming is, according to Google, anyway, the language of patriarchy itself.

Profiles in Minionhood: The Penis Police

Talton

Meet Robert Talton, delusional Republican bureaucrat. Gaze upon his puffy pink jowls. Behold his vacuous wire-framed stare. Contemplate his insipid, sanctimonious pie-hole. Behind these thick, offensive features is congealed the pea-sized brain of the lowest form of life on Earth: the ignorant bigot.

Robert Talton is a dude out of whom the shit is scared by the idea of abused and neglected children being looked after by couples whose particular combination of X and Y chromosomes do not happen to jive with his interpretation of certain aspects of early Christian mythology.

It all started when some early Christians got their breechclouts in a bunch over homosexuals because they (the early Christians) were keen to preserve their patriarchal social order. Patriarchy is an institution that can survive only through male cohesion, which in turn depends on subordination of women. They knew that if men were allowed to stick it to other men instead of women, the whole dudes-rule system would buckle under the weight of its own internecine melodramas. Policing the penis became a Christian passion.

Fast forward to 21st century Texas. Penis-policing is now Christianity’s #2 hobby, second only to women-hatin’. So apparently the Apostle Paul or some other ancient misogynist homophobic anti-Semite appeared to Robert Talton on a grilled cheese sandwich and informed him that crack babies are better off eating gruel in underfunded state institutions than with a pair of dykes who actually love them. Thus did Penis Policeman Talton amend Senate Bill 6 to include a provision banning gays or lesbians  from fostering children. This amendment would be implemented by renaming the Department of Family and Protective Services "The Queer Inquisition." Another provision would appropriate funding for sewing the pink triangles onto overcoats.

It is unclear why any interpretation of early Christian mythology should be brought to bear on discussions concerning peoples’ fitness to raise orphans. It makes just as much sense to base the Texas foster care system on the Cliff Notes to the works of Shakespeare.

Chump A: I vehemently disagree with you that Hamlet is mad, because in Act I, Scene V, he tells Horatio that he is merely going to feign madness.
Chump B: Hamlet is mad, I tell you! Polonius says so in Act II, Scene ii!
Chump A: Bite me, you anti-Hamlite! Polonius says there’s a method in his madness, which means Hamlet isn’t mad, and anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly unfit to foster a crack baby!

But the basis for state legislation in Texas in the year 2005 is not, alas, foolish interpretations of the works of Shakespeare, but rather foolish interpretations of the works of misogynist homophobic anti-Semites from the Roman Empire chronicling the adventures of a dead Jewish superhero. Although there is no evidence to support them, many Texans base their beliefs on these stories. They are convinced that their unprovable beliefs are more right than anyone else’s unprovable beliefs, and that these unprovable beliefs are especially more right than provable facts. Regrettably, it’s these same uneducated, superstitious throwbacks who often get elected to public office, where they feel compelled to legislate their primitive superstitions.

Thus is Western civilization plagued with miserable fungi like the aforementioned fucktard State Representative Robert Talton, whose name has appeared on no fewer than six bills in two years that would write discrimination into Texas law.

“Quite frankly,” quoth he, his tiny mind gleaming in the sun like a milky cataract in the eye of a blind pig, “I would rather leave kids in orphanages.”

Twisty Gets An MRI Arthrogram

Mri

So if you’re ever in a position to chuck a 25-pound baby up in the air and catch her again, and find that this is a rewarding experience because the tyke in question approves of it so effervescently so you do it a few more times, and then you do 40 laps at the pool, and then you non-chalantly reach across the counter for a Grande Mocha Frappucino at Starbuck’s, a word of caution: unless you are fond of searing pain and sensory deprivation, do not repeat these maneuvers so frequently that a ligament in your left middle-aged shoulder snaps.

If you do, it is inevitable that sooner or later you should find yourself strapped to a slab under unflattering fluorescent lights, wearing a flimsy gown out of which your butt doth stick, with two technicians jabbing foot-long needles deep into your rotator cuff through which they propose to inject quite a lot of radioactive dye.

Your screams will be recorded as seismic activity by geologists in Peru.

Next, you will be blindfolded, and given headphones through which Top 40 music is playing, and cautioned not to breathe, and inserted into a giant metal tube from which emanates deafening space-ship noises, for a period of at least 20 minutes. During this interim you will experience panic responses, hallucinations, and thoughts of suicide. Oh, and the 20 minutes will seem like weeks.

Oh, and you will pay about $73,000 for the pleasure.

Just an F.Y. I.

FascismWatch ‘05

Gerald_allen
Alabama psycho douchebag Gerald Allen

Just in case you missed it: this nutjob state senator in Alabama has actually introduced a bill to ban gay authors from public school libraries. So long, Virginia Woolf! Sayonara, Plato! What’s next, mandatory pink triangles? Out fucking rageous. From CBS News.

Rock’n'Roll’s Bogus Narrative, Part II

A film about The Ramones — the band that popularized the “go start your own awful band” craze (and the concomitant brick wall band photo craze) — aired last night on PBS “Independent Lens.” Painful though it was, I watched all of it, and by “all of it” I of course mean “part of it.” I bailed at the part where the band (minus the recently deceased) gave acceptance speeches at the Rock’n'Roll Hall of Predominantly Male Fame.

How can anybody stand watching celebrities accept awards for celebrity? You’d think all the drugs and money and pussy would be reward enough. Greedy bastards.

I offer no opinion — although of course I have one — on either the artsiness of the rockumentary or the value of the Ramones’ contribution to Western civilization. But I do offer an opinion on patriarchy, and I don’t mind telling you that what chapped my hide while watching this film was its depiction of the lifeblood of rock’n'roll, the relentless celebration of women-hatin’.

Not that the relentless celebration of women-hatin’ is the ostensible focus of End of the Century; this is a fan-boy movie, made strictly to ennoble the objects of fan-boy worship. In fact, because the Ramones were a rock band, and rock, like all art and culture, exiles women to its periphery, End of the Century only mentions women a few times. But when it does, it abstracts them in terms of “getting laid,” a phrase that acknowledges implications only for the male rock star in question, and in terms of pussy-ownership, which is feminist for “it should be obvious by now who owns any given vagina, but the fact is, the owner is rarely the woman to whom it is attached, especially where rockdudes are concerned.”

It is no secret that rock’n'roll values women only as receptacles, but what may be less obvious is that this makes rock’s whole rebellion-against-The-Establishment ethos a total crock of shit. In fact, rock’n'roll, like any other cultural movement generated within a patriarchy, is just an intensified little microcosm in which the hegemony of the culture that spawned it is concentrated, exaggerated, and ultimately consecrated (such as in a fanboy rockumentary).

For white guys like the Ramones and their fanboys, rock’n'roll took off in the 60’s, when it became emblematic of revolution and free love. Few women in the 60’s, however, actually benefitted from all that grooviness. For them, “revolution” meant trading in matrimonial slavery to one man for a theoretical obligation to all men, and “free love” meant having to give it up on demand or risk being chucked out of the movement as a buzzkill and a drag and a square.

Surrounded by hordes of star-struck sycophants, rock stars were singularly well-situated to take advantage of the new fuck-friendly paradigm. But it was “free” and “revolutionary” only in the sense that it dispensed with some of the pesky social niceties that patriarchy had for centuries imposed on men who wanted to screw. For women, the result was the essentially same: men in positions of power were whippin’ off a piece with no responsibilities, and women were capitulating in the hope that it would raise their status [1]. There were no openings for them in the band. The only openings were between their legs [2].

In other words, the culture that spawned rock’n'roll was as conservative and misogynist as any, and rock’n'roll, rather than rejecting society’s violent values of oppression in a true attempt to rebel against the hated Establishment, embraced them like a long-lost millionaire uncle. In fact, rock distilled misogyny into a media-anointed exaltation of the white male ego unprecedented in cultural history [3]. They took the money, they took the pussy, and now they’re taking the car commercials. This ideology persists in 21st century youth culture, having been appropriated most notoriously by the hip-hop scene, which has trained its women to revel in the designation “bitches and hoes.”

Because rock’n'roll doggedly and conservatively seeks to preserve the male supremacist status quo, it isn’t surprising that the central crisis in the Ramones mythology is the episode of “woman stealing” that results in a permanent rift between the two principal Ramones. For millennia, the Stolen Woman motif has enjoyed uninterrupted popularity as literary device in the service of patriarchy (see Paris and Helen of Troy, Guinevere and Sir Meleagant, et al). Nothing reaffirms warm feelings about male supremacy like a Greek epic in which a beautiful woman has no say in her own sexual destiny! In the Ramones version, Johnny purloins Joey’s property [4], marries her, and the two never speak again.

A previous rock love triangle resulted in “Layla”; fortunately, in responding musically to their own melodrama, the Ramones spared us the guitar wanking ignominy and incessant airplay of the classic rock anthem by releasing “KKK Took My Baby Away.”

You know, the oft-predicted but seemingly never-quite-realized death of rock’n'roll can’t happen soon enough for me. Enough, already!

________________________

[1] Over the years, of all the patriarchy-obliging women who sought to improve their status by fucking rock stars, the only one onto whose person even a whiff of celebrity stench was able to more or less permanently adhere is Pamela Des Barres. She wrote a tell-all about her years as a receptacle for the egocentric spurtings of famous men. In it she calls herself a ‘muse’

[2] I am personally acquainted with old school rocker dudes who think Cynthia Plaster Caster is the bee’s knees, but have nothing for disdain for the talents of the “chick bass players” who started showing up in indie bands in the 90’s. You want approval? Worship the dick.

[3]“Even though we were the worst band ever, we still insisted on blowjobs before every show, now that I remember it.” — A male acquaintance recollecting his glory days as a punk rocker in the early 80’s.

[4] A woman named Linda whose existence as an individual the filmmakers deem so peripheral to the story that they allow her to appear only as a disembodied off-camera voice, even though she is clearly sitting within a few feet of Johnny Ramone as he is interviewed.

Tuesday Bug Blogging

Blue-fronted dancer

Blue-fronted dancer

People dismiss bugs. This is a fatal mistake. Because without bugs, there’s nothing to eat your bugs.

Pictured above is another of the gajillion damselflies common to Central Texas, the jaunty female Argia apicalis, or blue-fronted dancer. Like most of the damselflies I chase around the Twisty Compound, this one was feasting on gnats galore, a practice I thoroughly endorse.

I’m telling you, if you don’t know already, that the fabulosity of the critters buzzing around within a few yards of your door will freak you out.

Wasp_polistes_exclamans_nesYesterday, for example, I observed a queen paper wasp of the Polistes exclamans clan gnawing on my deck railing. She wasn’t doing this just to pass an idle hour of a lazy afternoon. You know those wasp nests? They make’em out of deck railing. And spit. Endless toil.

Adbusters: “Capitalism” Is The New “Rebellion”

Adbusters_1

It’s TV Turn-Off Week again. I saw an ad for it on the Adbusters website. The culturejammers are going to go around turning off TVs in public places. Presumably they will do this using the $15 TV-B-Gones they bought after seeing TV-B-Gone ads on the Adbusters website.

Adbusters is against ads.

The Adbusters website also has ads for other stuff that’s against ads. Books, posters, videos.

And shoes.

That’s because Adbusters is also against Nike. So they invented their own for-profit, anti-Nike sneaker company, The Blackspot Anticorporation. Blackspot Anticorporation sneakers are vegan, organic, Fluevog-designed, and made in rural Portugal by rosy-cheeked workers who skip contentedly through olive groves on their way to work. The sneakers cost about $60. They have an anti-logo on’em.

An “anti-logo” is a logo used by an anticorporation to brand a product so that the kind of anti-lifestyle it pretends to sell is readily apparent to the anti-consumer. Anti-consumers of Blackspot Anticorporation sneakers want to anti-consume the lifestyle of the renegade iconoclast, as is evidenced by the “hand-drawn” red spot on the toe, which is “for kicking corporate ass,” and by its antimercial.

An “antimercial” is a commercial that says “by buying this product, you are speaking out against commercials.”

The antimercial for Blackspot Anticorporation sneakers shows white male youths keepin it real by leaping around on dirty snowbanks, wearing the sneakers. The soundtrack is N.E.R.D.’s “Lap Dance,” which goes like this:

“I’m an outlaw
quick on the draw
somethin you never seen before
and I dare the muthafucka to cum in my face.”

An “anticorporation,” by the way, is a corporation.

Habemus Twistam!

Leafblower_1In a dramatic conclusion to the emergency conclave held last night at Twisty Palace, white smoke rose from the ashtray. I was elected pope by a slender margin (it is not generally known, but the cat voted against me). There were no nun-slaves to make me a banquet. I ate leftover Cripsy Tofu Suey Deluxe.

This morning my first order of business, as the infallible mouthpiece of the fake, invisible, and vengeful ghost known as Ozone, is to ordain that it is the will of Ozone that all leaf blowers be set on fire.

For there was once a cul-de-sac in a hood called Zilker, and in one of the shed-roofed bungalows there lived a leaf-hata named Jane. Every Saturday morning at 7 o’clock Jane would spring from her bed, fire up her leaf-blower, which sounded like a dentist’s drill, and attempt to subdue her leaves by deafening them with a fearful racket. She would keep at it until 9 o’clock on Sunday night.

Ozone appeared to Jane and said unto her, “Your leaf-hate will destroy you. For you will deafen not the leaves. And see, you blowest them merely from one side of your yard to the other and back again. Why not watch ‘The Simpsons’ instead?”

But Jane did not listen. Whereupon Jane’s sleep-deprived neighbor Twisty did wheel a 100-watt Mesa/Boogie Dual Rectifier Trem-O-Verb over to the window, and she did crank it, and she did play “Sweet Jane,” with an awful Elvis ending (Vegas-era), over and over on an out-of-tune ‘68 SG strung with piano wire. And Jane fell unconscious from the relentless pummeling ennui of Classic Rock, and did collapse on a pile of enemy leaves. And the leaves did absorb her completely, leaving no trace. Twisty had smote her. And the leaf-blower at last fell silent.

And then Twisty smashed the drums with the SG, and did yell “Thank you Austin! Good night!” and did turn off the Mesa/Boogie, and did go to back bed.

Crispy Tofu Suey Deluxe à la Zilker

Crispy Tofu Chop Suey à la Zilker

Fish (Sauce) Story

Back in my glamor days as a highly-paid professional food writer in St. Louis, Missouri, Gateway To The West, my beat included the thousand little ethnic dives that any restaurant critic’s flesh is heir to: the Thai, Vietnamese, Korean, and Chinese joints lining the humbler streets of town. Readers of Midwestern newsweeklies, it turned out, are rabid to know where they can get a three-course dinner for 79 cents.

I stuffed my craw at so many of these joints that I eventually got nam pla poisoning and had to resign my post. For a period of several years following my overdose, even a passing whiff of nam pla sent me into violent convulsions. If somebody started reciting a poem about nam pla, I had to leave the room. If they named their cat Nam Pla, I could not be their friend. If someone gave me a bottle of nam pla as a joke, I would not think it was funny. It was that bad.

But after I’d been back in Austin for a few years — I had to come back to treat a chronic and debilitating taco deficiency — I began to pine for the good old Shu Fengs and Pho Grands of my youth. Crispy Tofu Suey Deluxe à la Zilker eventually emerged as an homage to the lot.

If I were writing a review of Crispy Tofu Suey Deluxe à la Zilker, I would certainly mock it, for it is just the sort of blasphemy I can’t stand from other cooks. The dish rashly Twistifies every take-out Asian culinary cliché there is: sprouts, cilantro, soy sauce, oyster sauce, peanuts, cornstarch, hoisin, sesame oil, chile peppers — you name it; if I can’t read the label, I throw it in the wok (even nam pla, although my hand still twitches when I touch the bottle). Thus the dish exhibits the phenotype of Chinese take-out (skipping the genre’s signature grease) but leans more toward Vietnamese on the flav-o-meter, only with vicious red Thai peppers. Also, it’s vegan, so no fluorescent pink pork, gamey broth, or monkey nuts, but it shatters the whole vegan belief system by being edible.

One ingredient you will never see in Cristpy Tofu Suey Deluxe à la Zilker are those flaccid little albino corn-cobs that come in cans. Man, are those things rank.

By the way, the raw leafy green vegetation scattered over the example pictured above is my new fave rave: sunflower sprouts. They’re sort of like alfalfa sprouts, only they’re 83 times bigger and don’t taste like hay, and they’re sort of like mung bean sprouts, only they don’t resemble parasitic worms. They actually taste good, and, like all sprouts, allow you to feel sanctimonious for having treated your body like a temple for five minutes.

I was moved to whip up this healthful batch of Crispy Tofu Suey Deluxe à la Zilker after reading in the National Enquirer that saturated fat is bad for you. It’s a good thing the Enquirer is on top of that breaking story!

Douchebags On Parade

Kindergartener_cops

Here’s the story about the little Florida girl who was handcuffed by 3 cops after throwing a tantrum in kindergarten. It is, in many respects, the story of douchebags.

My inability to consistently find other peoples’ children adorable is no secret. But any real antipathy I reserve entirely for the parents; bratty kids are just hapless flotsam in the churning whirl of their self-absorbed parents’ neuroses.

Watching the video of this cherub having her little fit, I have three thoughts. One: all the adults in her life are  douchebags. Two: I admire her outlaw attitude and fuck-the-establishment spirit. Three: sadly, the Establishment does not allow little black girls to fuck it for long.

That’s right. Patriarchy’s douchebag minions are on the job! To wit:

Americablogger and liberal activist John Aravosis diagnoses the terrified tyke–who gets yanked from her chair by armed enforcers and is fucking handcuffed like a criminal while a crowd of her teachers stands obediently by–as “truly the bitch from hell.”

I mean, dude. She’s five.

Some of the other charming comments in the related thread on Aravosis’ supposedly progressive blog reveal how thoroughly the sacred violent misogynist ideals of the neocon movement have been absorbed by its second-most-hated enemy, the lefty fags. A sample:

  • Maybe the Supreme Court will bring back execution for minors. At the very least, they should have tazored the little monster.
  • This kid needed a extra large can of Whoop Ass opened on her. What a little bitch!
  • I’d make that little Jezebel wish she’d never been born
  • And sorry, being a liberal doesn’t mean you should view that little demon as a victim!
  • You want to jump off the table and break your neck? Here, let me help you!
  • I would have smacked that little girl hard.

Way to spread the hate, liberal douchebags! It’s lovely to inhabit a world where a 5-year-old girl is a "bitch" and a "Jezebel" just for bucking the system.

Ordinarily I would blame the patriarchy, but in this case I think at least some of the credit has to go to plain old meanness.