<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Proves Women Are Different From Men</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: rhondda</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-352</link>
		<author>rhondda</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>So it only goes to prove that an orgasm for a woman is a totally body experience.  Doesn't just happen in the brain guys.  There are other factors to consider. Well, perhaps emotions are not just in the head.  Golly, what a concept.
What I want to know is what woman in her right mind would be hooked up to a brain scan while having sex?  And how many women agreed to do this?  Where does love come into this "scientific" experiment?   Can a women fake love? Is a faked orgasm really a sign of not wanting to hurt feelings or is it something else?  Yes, I need to know this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it only goes to prove that an orgasm for a woman is a totally body experience.  Doesn&#8217;t just happen in the brain guys.  There are other factors to consider. Well, perhaps emotions are not just in the head.  Golly, what a concept.<br />
What I want to know is what woman in her right mind would be hooked up to a brain scan while having sex?  And how many women agreed to do this?  Where does love come into this &#8220;scientific&#8221; experiment?   Can a women fake love? Is a faked orgasm really a sign of not wanting to hurt feelings or is it something else?  Yes, I need to know this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-353</link>
		<author>Ron Sullivan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What I want to know is what woman in her right mind would be hooked up to a brain scan while having sex?&lt;/i&gt;

I wondered about that too. Suggests some odd fetish, doesn't it? And yeah, sample size -- do the brains of people with different fetishes differ in PET-visible reactions? How about multiple orgasms? Are the second, third, fourth... different? I mean, they &lt;b&gt;feel&lt;/b&gt; different. 

Tsk. So many unanswered questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What I want to know is what woman in her right mind would be hooked up to a brain scan while having sex?</i></p>
<p>I wondered about that too. Suggests some odd fetish, doesn&#8217;t it? And yeah, sample size &#8212; do the brains of people with different fetishes differ in PET-visible reactions? How about multiple orgasms? Are the second, third, fourth&#8230; different? I mean, they <b>feel</b> different. </p>
<p>Tsk. So many unanswered questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseudo-Adrienne</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-354</link>
		<author>Pseudo-Adrienne</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>"&lt;i&gt;[...]â€œbut there is nothing really happening in the brain.â€&lt;/i&gt;"

And when women say something like this about men's brains we're called "male-bashers" or "man-haters." I actually concur with your criticism of the ridiculous "brain-dead sexbot" and the male sex-fantasy tripe, you picked up on from these researchers and articles. The "ultimate" and pornographic male fantasy always seems to portray the female as some unthinking "pleasure vessel" and a mere sex-receptacle, whose sole purpose is to sexuall gratify the male. There's pretty much nothing else to her. She's just supposed to howl and scream in ecstasy, and validate the guy's sense of "&lt;i&gt;awesome&lt;/i&gt;" virility and manhood. Just like an obedient robot--reinforce their master's sense of superiority. Any guesses as to what the sex of the first sex-partner-robot will be?

"&lt;i&gt;Doesn't just happen in the brain guys. There are other factors to consider.&lt;/i&gt;"

Yes, factors such as guys giving two shits about their female partner rather than focusing all of their attention on their dicks (or just themselves). How about guys asking their [female] partners what they want or learning about the mechanisms of the female body--rather than relying on porn that mostly nourishes the "ever so submissive female sexbot" male fantasy.

"&lt;i&gt;What I want to know is what woman in her right mind would be hooked up to a brain scan while having sex?&lt;/i&gt;" 

Maybe it's some kind of new sex-fad. You know, I guess there are some people who are kinky like that, and want to be hooked up to technical equipment during sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>[&#8230;]â€œbut there is nothing really happening in the brain.â€</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>And when women say something like this about men&#8217;s brains we&#8217;re called &#8220;male-bashers&#8221; or &#8220;man-haters.&#8221; I actually concur with your criticism of the ridiculous &#8220;brain-dead sexbot&#8221; and the male sex-fantasy tripe, you picked up on from these researchers and articles. The &#8220;ultimate&#8221; and pornographic male fantasy always seems to portray the female as some unthinking &#8220;pleasure vessel&#8221; and a mere sex-receptacle, whose sole purpose is to sexuall gratify the male. There&#8217;s pretty much nothing else to her. She&#8217;s just supposed to howl and scream in ecstasy, and validate the guy&#8217;s sense of &#8220;<i>awesome</i>&#8221; virility and manhood. Just like an obedient robot&#8211;reinforce their master&#8217;s sense of superiority. Any guesses as to what the sex of the first sex-partner-robot will be?</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Doesn&#8217;t just happen in the brain guys. There are other factors to consider.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, factors such as guys giving two shits about their female partner rather than focusing all of their attention on their dicks (or just themselves). How about guys asking their [female] partners what they want or learning about the mechanisms of the female body&#8211;rather than relying on porn that mostly nourishes the &#8220;ever so submissive female sexbot&#8221; male fantasy.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>What I want to know is what woman in her right mind would be hooked up to a brain scan while having sex?</i>&#8221; </p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s some kind of new sex-fad. You know, I guess there are some people who are kinky like that, and want to be hooked up to technical equipment during sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crys T</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-355</link>
		<author>Crys T</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-355</guid>
		<description>Re the brain "shutting down" crap:  well WTF???  I don't even buy the bit about the fear part shutting down.  Well, maybe if it's actually the bit that controls the body's outward physiological fear responses, but I know I've sure as hell felt fear or something damned close to it during orgasms.

And I'm also capable of coming and entertaining coherent thougts at the same time.  Guess I must be some sort of freak, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the brain &#8220;shutting down&#8221; crap:  well WTF???  I don&#8217;t even buy the bit about the fear part shutting down.  Well, maybe if it&#8217;s actually the bit that controls the body&#8217;s outward physiological fear responses, but I know I&#8217;ve sure as hell felt fear or something damned close to it during orgasms.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m also capable of coming and entertaining coherent thougts at the same time.  Guess I must be some sort of freak, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-356</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>This is what happens when the people who are making connections between actual brain activity and a supposed physial manifestation actually lack any connection between their brain activity and the resulting manifestation of making a pronouncement about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what happens when the people who are making connections between actual brain activity and a supposed physial manifestation actually lack any connection between their brain activity and the resulting manifestation of making a pronouncement about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-357</link>
		<author>Twisty</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Nothing spoils a witty look-how-stupid-you-are zinger like an unfortunate spelling mishap. Rotten luck, chump!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing spoils a witty look-how-stupid-you-are zinger like an unfortunate spelling mishap. Rotten luck, chump!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndiF</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-358</link>
		<author>AndiF</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Well, I'm the chump (the anonymous posting and mispelling were both accidental) but I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about the guys writing the articles. So I definitey misfired and will hang my head in shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m the chump (the anonymous posting and mispelling were both accidental) but I wasn&#8217;t talking about you. I was talking about the guys writing the articles. So I definitey misfired and will hang my head in shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndiF</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-359</link>
		<author>AndiF</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>and there's yet another typo -- that's 'definitely misfired'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and there&#8217;s yet another typo &#8212; that&#8217;s &#8216;definitely misfired&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-360</link>
		<author>Twisty</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Ha! And here I was patting myself on the back for having so cleverly dispatched the troll. Sorry!

You know about that Law of Internet Dynamics that says "any post that points out a spelling or grammatical error will itself contain a spelling or grammatical error"? Ain't it always the way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! And here I was patting myself on the back for having so cleverly dispatched the troll. Sorry!</p>
<p>You know about that Law of Internet Dynamics that says &#8220;any post that points out a spelling or grammatical error will itself contain a spelling or grammatical error&#8221;? Ain&#8217;t it always the way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndiF</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-361</link>
		<author>AndiF</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/06/20/science-proves-women-are-different-from-men/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>I have only myself to blame for the confusion on the comment but the typos I blame entirely on my 8th grade typing teacher who kept making me type "I will work hard in typing class to improve my typing and not my communication skills" which is of course the only damn sentence I can type with speed and accuracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only myself to blame for the confusion on the comment but the typos I blame entirely on my 8th grade typing teacher who kept making me type &#8220;I will work hard in typing class to improve my typing and not my communication skills&#8221; which is of course the only damn sentence I can type with speed and accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
