<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PuppyWatch &#8216;05: Still Cute</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: WookieMonster</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-948</link>
		<author>WookieMonster</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-948</guid>
		<description>I love that you can make me laugh while simultaneously scaring the crap out of me.  It takes some of the sting out.

Damn patriarchy (and uber-stupid FfL)!

(Your ball of fluff is still adorable BTW, thanks for inflicting the cuteness.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that you can make me laugh while simultaneously scaring the crap out of me.  It takes some of the sting out.</p>
<p>Damn patriarchy (and uber-stupid FfL)!</p>
<p>(Your ball of fluff is still adorable BTW, thanks for inflicting the cuteness.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larkspur</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-949</link>
		<author>larkspur</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-949</guid>
		<description>I wonder when they will deploy Phase 2: removing the offspring from the care of their would-be killers (damn, I mean their mothers!) to be raised in a decent Christianistic environment.

Oh, shit.  That's right.  There isn't that sort of Phase 2, because if you're not pre-born, you're on your own and off their radar.  Next fetus, please!

Topic shift:

How's Bert been doing at night?  How many litter-mates did he have?  Where does he sleep now?  Does he know that I love him?  Don't tell me you haven't told him yet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder when they will deploy Phase 2: removing the offspring from the care of their would-be killers (damn, I mean their mothers!) to be raised in a decent Christianistic environment.</p>
<p>Oh, shit.  That&#8217;s right.  There isn&#8217;t that sort of Phase 2, because if you&#8217;re not pre-born, you&#8217;re on your own and off their radar.  Next fetus, please!</p>
<p>Topic shift:</p>
<p>How&#8217;s Bert been doing at night?  How many litter-mates did he have?  Where does he sleep now?  Does he know that I love him?  Don&#8217;t tell me you haven&#8217;t told him yet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-950</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Do these people realize their group name is straight thugging?

Feminist 4 Life, killa. Recognize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do these people realize their group name is straight thugging?</p>
<p>Feminist 4 Life, killa. Recognize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-951</link>
		<author>Twisty</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Well, Larkspur, the Feminists For Life, though they appear to enjoy reinforcing the notion of women as babymakers, actually aren't as full-on nasty as some; they at least seem to give half a hang for fully-realized humans. Quoth Roberts, "the group's focus is to eliminate, through practical solutions, the root causes of driving girls and women to abortion," which appear to inlcude "pressing colleges to provide affordable housing and healthcare for new parents, fighting family caps in welfare reform, working for expansion of the Violence Against Women Act, and seeking better enforcement on child support."

But still.

Also, Bert's doing great. He has a bladder the size of a pea, but he likes his crate, which is right next to my bed, and last night I only had to get up twice to let him out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Larkspur, the Feminists For Life, though they appear to enjoy reinforcing the notion of women as babymakers, actually aren&#8217;t as full-on nasty as some; they at least seem to give half a hang for fully-realized humans. Quoth Roberts, &#8220;the group&#8217;s focus is to eliminate, through practical solutions, the root causes of driving girls and women to abortion,&#8221; which appear to inlcude &#8220;pressing colleges to provide affordable housing and healthcare for new parents, fighting family caps in welfare reform, working for expansion of the Violence Against Women Act, and seeking better enforcement on child support.&#8221;</p>
<p>But still.</p>
<p>Also, Bert&#8217;s doing great. He has a bladder the size of a pea, but he likes his crate, which is right next to my bed, and last night I only had to get up twice to let him out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norbizness</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-952</link>
		<author>norbizness</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-952</guid>
		<description>I'm not familiar with Ms. Roberts' group, but it seems to be related to that crew from the 60s: "Negroes For Gettin' Chewed On By Police Dogs."

BTW, just got back into town. Congratulations on the dog, no doubt named for Bert Parks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with Ms. Roberts&#8217; group, but it seems to be related to that crew from the 60s: &#8220;Negroes For Gettin&#8217; Chewed On By Police Dogs.&#8221;</p>
<p>BTW, just got back into town. Congratulations on the dog, no doubt named for Bert Parks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitchphd</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-953</link>
		<author>bitchphd</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Far be it from me to differ from Twisty, but from what I've seen of "Feminists for Life," their mission seems to me at least intellectually consistent: rather than concentrate on criminalizing abortion (they've apparently moved away from legislative advocacy), they're working on foregrounding feminist issues that address the root problems of *why* women need abortions--economic vulnerability, social stigmas against motherhood, and so on.  While I don't think that, even in the perfect feminist utopia, no one would need abortions, I have to admit that I do admire an anti-abortion organization that "gets" that abortion is a feminist issue, not only b/c of the bottom-line position that it is necessary, but because there are lots of cases where, in a better world, it wouldn't be.  And I don't know that I entirely object to a sincerely-held position that life is sacred and that abortion, for that reason, is regrettable; I don't agree that abortion is regrettable, but I can respect people who do, you know?  

I think part of where I'm coming at this from is being a Catholic myself, and having long thought that yeah, in a religion where motherhood is absolutely central (leaving aside the many, many misogynist sins of the church), there's a space for the argument that what's needed is a world in which motherhood is *so* central that abortion and all the other reproductive and feminist issues would be integrated into the larger society.  I do think that abortion will always be necessary (and I'm not 100% clear on whether Feminists for Life really wants to go so far as to make it illegal, or whether they're more interested in changing social conditions to make it rare), and I'm a little wary of an organization that could play so easily into the hands of the Operation Rescue crowd.  But I'm not entirely sure that the aims of a pro-woman organization that wants to create a world that's better for women and mothers are necessarily bad, skeeved though I am by the potentially patriarchal overtones.  I'd really have to know more about the organization (and Ms. Roberts's own views) to know for sure if this is patriarchy under another guise, or a radically feminist world view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far be it from me to differ from Twisty, but from what I&#8217;ve seen of &#8220;Feminists for Life,&#8221; their mission seems to me at least intellectually consistent: rather than concentrate on criminalizing abortion (they&#8217;ve apparently moved away from legislative advocacy), they&#8217;re working on foregrounding feminist issues that address the root problems of *why* women need abortions&#8211;economic vulnerability, social stigmas against motherhood, and so on.  While I don&#8217;t think that, even in the perfect feminist utopia, no one would need abortions, I have to admit that I do admire an anti-abortion organization that &#8220;gets&#8221; that abortion is a feminist issue, not only b/c of the bottom-line position that it is necessary, but because there are lots of cases where, in a better world, it wouldn&#8217;t be.  And I don&#8217;t know that I entirely object to a sincerely-held position that life is sacred and that abortion, for that reason, is regrettable; I don&#8217;t agree that abortion is regrettable, but I can respect people who do, you know?  </p>
<p>I think part of where I&#8217;m coming at this from is being a Catholic myself, and having long thought that yeah, in a religion where motherhood is absolutely central (leaving aside the many, many misogynist sins of the church), there&#8217;s a space for the argument that what&#8217;s needed is a world in which motherhood is *so* central that abortion and all the other reproductive and feminist issues would be integrated into the larger society.  I do think that abortion will always be necessary (and I&#8217;m not 100% clear on whether Feminists for Life really wants to go so far as to make it illegal, or whether they&#8217;re more interested in changing social conditions to make it rare), and I&#8217;m a little wary of an organization that could play so easily into the hands of the Operation Rescue crowd.  But I&#8217;m not entirely sure that the aims of a pro-woman organization that wants to create a world that&#8217;s better for women and mothers are necessarily bad, skeeved though I am by the potentially patriarchal overtones.  I&#8217;d really have to know more about the organization (and Ms. Roberts&#8217;s own views) to know for sure if this is patriarchy under another guise, or a radically feminist world view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-954</link>
		<author>Steph</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-954</guid>
		<description>I'm a mother of two, well educated, economically secure, white, happy, married.  There is no reason for me not to have more kids under the Feminists for Life concept, except that I do not more kids... ever.

We have taken all the necessary contraceptive steps, but on the off chance that I get pregnant I will have an abortion.  

I know feminists try to explain the reasons why women have abortions and highlight the social/economic structures which make it difficult to continue with a pregnancy, but we also have to face the fact that some women want to have sex, but do not want to have (more) children.

That is why a large percentage of women who have abortions are married and already have children.  They know what mothering is all about and how having another child will change their lives and they would prefer that not happen.

Shutting down the patriarchy ain't going to make me have more babies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a mother of two, well educated, economically secure, white, happy, married.  There is no reason for me not to have more kids under the Feminists for Life concept, except that I do not more kids&#8230; ever.</p>
<p>We have taken all the necessary contraceptive steps, but on the off chance that I get pregnant I will have an abortion.  </p>
<p>I know feminists try to explain the reasons why women have abortions and highlight the social/economic structures which make it difficult to continue with a pregnancy, but we also have to face the fact that some women want to have sex, but do not want to have (more) children.</p>
<p>That is why a large percentage of women who have abortions are married and already have children.  They know what mothering is all about and how having another child will change their lives and they would prefer that not happen.</p>
<p>Shutting down the patriarchy ain&#8217;t going to make me have more babies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-955</link>
		<author>Steph</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>and, OMG your puppy is cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and, OMG your puppy is cute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitchphd</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-956</link>
		<author>bitchphd</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Steph.  That's why I said my bottom line is that abortion is always gonna be necessary, and I do think that's a huge blind spot in those "preventing abortion" arguments.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Steph.  That&#8217;s why I said my bottom line is that abortion is always gonna be necessary, and I do think that&#8217;s a huge blind spot in those &#8220;preventing abortion&#8221; arguments.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphabtich</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-957</link>
		<author>alphabtich</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/07/22/puppywatch-05-still-cute/#comment-957</guid>
		<description>It's me again.  I can't stop looking at Bertie's picture.  I am powerless over cute puppy pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s me again.  I can&#8217;t stop looking at Bertie&#8217;s picture.  I am powerless over cute puppy pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
