<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Dowdy Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xavier_Harkonnen</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier_Harkonnen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s because we perceive chick flicks as portraying women as being shallow human beings, and we only want to see a shallow character if he (occasionally she) is blowing shit up.  I think that I have learned to distinguish between the shallow chick flicks and the good ones, though, since my mom has made me watch so many movies with her.  Bewitched:  dumb.  Pride and Prejudice:  good.  Calendar Girls:  okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s because we perceive chick flicks as portraying women as being shallow human beings, and we only want to see a shallow character if he (occasionally she) is blowing shit up.  I think that I have learned to distinguish between the shallow chick flicks and the good ones, though, since my mom has made me watch so many movies with her.  Bewitched:  dumb.  Pride and Prejudice:  good.  Calendar Girls:  okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier_Harkonnen</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4971</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier_Harkonnen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4971</guid>
		<description>Actually, Bewitched was ok too.  Right now I can&#039;t think of any chick flicks that outright sucked.  In fact, I even like the soppy &quot;Sweet November&quot; and its Mormon ripoff &quot;Charlie.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Bewitched was ok too.  Right now I can&#8217;t think of any chick flicks that outright sucked.  In fact, I even like the soppy &#8220;Sweet November&#8221; and its Mormon ripoff &#8220;Charlie.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hattie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4972</link>
		<dc:creator>Hattie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4972</guid>
		<description>I wish Bill Maher would shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Bill Maher would shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badteeth</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4973</link>
		<dc:creator>badteeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4973</guid>
		<description>The only reason Thelma and Louise was any good was Harvey Keitel and whoever played Geena Davis&#039;s husband.  That guy was my hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason Thelma and Louise was any good was Harvey Keitel and whoever played Geena Davis&#8217;s husband.  That guy was my hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badteeth</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>badteeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>The only reason Thelma and Louise was any good was Harvey Keitel and whoever played Geena Davis&#039;s husband.  That guy was my hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason Thelma and Louise was any good was Harvey Keitel and whoever played Geena Davis&#8217;s husband.  That guy was my hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugh</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4975</link>
		<dc:creator>ugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4975</guid>
		<description>Begin Operation &quot;Ignore The Thing That&#039;s Posted Above&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Begin Operation &#8220;Ignore The Thing That&#8217;s Posted Above&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffalo Gal</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4976</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffalo Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4976</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t get past the first page.  MoDo claims not to be a feminist, and to have read &quot;How to Catch a Man&quot; without results.  So why does she blame feminism for her manlessness?  

For the record, I followed the catch-and-release protocol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t get past the first page.  MoDo claims not to be a feminist, and to have read &#8220;How to Catch a Man&#8221; without results.  So why does she blame feminism for her manlessness?  </p>
<p>For the record, I followed the catch-and-release protocol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4977</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4977</guid>
		<description>I read the Maureen Dowd excerpt in its entirety, and I wasn&#039;t offended. It seemed to me more of a cynical lament about the state of gender politics than a prescriptive statement -- you know, here we are, some 40 years after Friedan, and everything still fucking sucks. Want proof? All you have to do is pick up a Cosmopolitan magazine. I do take issue with her premise that men are turned off by intelligent, educated women. Sure, some, perhaps most, men are, but those are the kind of men that most intelligent, educated women wouldn&#039;t want to be with anyway. 

Salient quotation: &quot;There it is, right in the DNA: women get penalized by insecure men for being too independent.&quot; Who wants an insecure man, anyway? Surely not Dowd herself, who obviously ignores the realpolitik advice from the how-to-catch-a-husband crowd that would-be husband-catchers are sarcastic at their own peril.

The single women I know are single because they, like Dowd, probably, don&#039;t want to settle for any old schlub who comes along. Feminism has afforded us the luxury of being picky.

Rene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the Maureen Dowd excerpt in its entirety, and I wasn&#8217;t offended. It seemed to me more of a cynical lament about the state of gender politics than a prescriptive statement &#8212; you know, here we are, some 40 years after Friedan, and everything still fucking sucks. Want proof? All you have to do is pick up a Cosmopolitan magazine. I do take issue with her premise that men are turned off by intelligent, educated women. Sure, some, perhaps most, men are, but those are the kind of men that most intelligent, educated women wouldn&#8217;t want to be with anyway. </p>
<p>Salient quotation: &#8220;There it is, right in the DNA: women get penalized by insecure men for being too independent.&#8221; Who wants an insecure man, anyway? Surely not Dowd herself, who obviously ignores the realpolitik advice from the how-to-catch-a-husband crowd that would-be husband-catchers are sarcastic at their own peril.</p>
<p>The single women I know are single because they, like Dowd, probably, don&#8217;t want to settle for any old schlub who comes along. Feminism has afforded us the luxury of being picky.</p>
<p>Rene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsKate</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4978</link>
		<dc:creator>MsKate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4978</guid>
		<description>Sheeit, I don&#039;t watch chick flicks either, at least not most of them.  Why?  Because they are boring boring boring.  Like listening to a scratched vinyl copy of &quot;Feeeeelinnnngs&quot; over and over at the wrong speed.  Yech.

I find them boring because they generally are not about women at all ... they are about what women are told they should be like.  Yeah, I dug Norma Rae, Coal Miner&#039;s Daughter, and Erin ... but that&#039;s because these were stories about the REAL lives of EXTRAORDINARY women.  No pretty woman bullshit, no working girl garbage.  Real. Women.  Thelma and Louise was fictional, but it also rocked because the characters were realistic, if twisted into high mayhem fantasy gear.

I don&#039;t like women who are cockwhipped in my movies.  Pathetic.  So much better to see gals that don&#039;t play by &quot;The Rules&quot;, and question the whole &quot;gotta getta man to make the movie perfect - most important thang ya know!&quot;

Which is exactly the problem with the MoDo article, which I did read.  Nowhere is it ever questioned that one does not need a man.  Want a man?  Desire a man?  Yearn for a fellow egalitarian traveller?  Sure.  Need? Not.  Something I read as a young teen always stuck with me. An elderly spinster was asked why she never married.  Her reply?  &quot;It takes an awfully good husband to be better than no husband at all&quot;.

Hear Hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheeit, I don&#8217;t watch chick flicks either, at least not most of them.  Why?  Because they are boring boring boring.  Like listening to a scratched vinyl copy of &#8220;Feeeeelinnnngs&#8221; over and over at the wrong speed.  Yech.</p>
<p>I find them boring because they generally are not about women at all &#8230; they are about what women are told they should be like.  Yeah, I dug Norma Rae, Coal Miner&#8217;s Daughter, and Erin &#8230; but that&#8217;s because these were stories about the REAL lives of EXTRAORDINARY women.  No pretty woman bullshit, no working girl garbage.  Real. Women.  Thelma and Louise was fictional, but it also rocked because the characters were realistic, if twisted into high mayhem fantasy gear.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like women who are cockwhipped in my movies.  Pathetic.  So much better to see gals that don&#8217;t play by &#8220;The Rules&#8221;, and question the whole &#8220;gotta getta man to make the movie perfect &#8211; most important thang ya know!&#8221;</p>
<p>Which is exactly the problem with the MoDo article, which I did read.  Nowhere is it ever questioned that one does not need a man.  Want a man?  Desire a man?  Yearn for a fellow egalitarian traveller?  Sure.  Need? Not.  Something I read as a young teen always stuck with me. An elderly spinster was asked why she never married.  Her reply?  &#8220;It takes an awfully good husband to be better than no husband at all&#8221;.</p>
<p>Hear Hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphabitch</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/01/not-dowdy-today/#comment-4979</link>
		<dc:creator>alphabitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=299#comment-4979</guid>
		<description>Twisty:  I know I&#039;ve said it before, but I would so totally make out with you, etc.  

Yeah, I thought whatsername was just a little cuter a few pounds heavier, but maybe it&#039;s just that I read the book and found the character engaging enough.  I never actually saw the movie, now that you mention it.  I did see her picture though - before, during, after, and again during and after.  What a crazy phenomenon that is: weight as a character attribute.  An ex-fashion/advertising photographer pal of mine pointed out a spread in &lt;em&gt;Vogue&lt;/em&gt; she did after the first movie and speculated that it was simply done to prove to those in the business that the weight gain was indeed deliberate and just a temporary professional sacrifice and she was over it and could safely be considered for new roles.

Buffalo Gal:  Catch and release!  That&#039;s hilarious!  You can&#039;t avoid a certain amount of inconvenience and harm, but you don&#039;t have to kill them just because they took the bait, poor bastards.  Sure it&#039;s cruel &amp; all, but if they&#039;re any kind of smart, they&#039;ll learn from the experience and maybe they won&#039;t go for such a shallow come-on the next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twisty:  I know I&#8217;ve said it before, but I would so totally make out with you, etc.  </p>
<p>Yeah, I thought whatsername was just a little cuter a few pounds heavier, but maybe it&#8217;s just that I read the book and found the character engaging enough.  I never actually saw the movie, now that you mention it.  I did see her picture though &#8211; before, during, after, and again during and after.  What a crazy phenomenon that is: weight as a character attribute.  An ex-fashion/advertising photographer pal of mine pointed out a spread in <em>Vogue</em> she did after the first movie and speculated that it was simply done to prove to those in the business that the weight gain was indeed deliberate and just a temporary professional sacrifice and she was over it and could safely be considered for new roles.</p>
<p>Buffalo Gal:  Catch and release!  That&#8217;s hilarious!  You can&#8217;t avoid a certain amount of inconvenience and harm, but you don&#8217;t have to kill them just because they took the bait, poor bastards.  Sure it&#8217;s cruel &#038; all, but if they&#8217;re any kind of smart, they&#8217;ll learn from the experience and maybe they won&#8217;t go for such a shallow come-on the next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

