<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nonsensical Chicks&#8217;ll Text Yer Ear Off</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: asilon</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5744</link>
		<author>asilon</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5744</guid>
		<description>Sheffield Hallam's in Sheffield, England.

What a bitter, twisted and woman-hating article; the Times of India writer is clearly a git.

It was reported in a rather more gender-neutral fashion in the two British papers I looked at: &lt;a href="http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,9865,1639438,00.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt; (liberal broadsheet) and &lt;a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16362011&#038;method=full&#038;siteid=94762&#038;headline=sexes-are-divided-on-joys-of-text--name_page.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Mirror&lt;/a&gt; (tabloid).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheffield Hallam&#8217;s in Sheffield, England.</p>
<p>What a bitter, twisted and woman-hating article; the Times of India writer is clearly a git.</p>
<p>It was reported in a rather more gender-neutral fashion in the two British papers I looked at: <a href="http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,9865,1639438,00.html" rel="nofollow">The Guardian</a> (liberal broadsheet) and <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16362011&#038;method=full&#038;siteid=94762&#038;headline=sexes-are-divided-on-joys-of-text--name_page.html" rel="nofollow">The Mirror</a> (tabloid).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimT</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5745</link>
		<author>TimT</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5745</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The fucktard researcher  noted that men "alter their strategy" by suddenly exhibiting textual nelliness--presumably they inexplicably begin to brim with atypical personality and affection--when they're trying to text some hottie into the sack.&lt;/i&gt;

0 TWSTY, I &lt;3 U, WLD U MK OUT WTH M3?

u + me 4va!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The fucktard researcher  noted that men &#8220;alter their strategy&#8221; by suddenly exhibiting textual nelliness&#8211;presumably they inexplicably begin to brim with atypical personality and affection&#8211;when they&#8217;re trying to text some hottie into the sack.</i></p>
<p>0 TWSTY, I &lt;3 U, WLD U MK OUT WTH M3?</p>
<p>u + me 4va!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5746</link>
		<author>Twisty</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5746</guid>
		<description>Alison, I note that the Guardian article observes that male texting behavior, i.e. "a man is more likely to text than phone his partner when he is out with friends" allows him to type his sweet nothings rather than expose his swearing, sarcastic, no-nonsense self to his beloved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison, I note that the Guardian article observes that male texting behavior, i.e. &#8220;a man is more likely to text than phone his partner when he is out with friends&#8221; allows him to type his sweet nothings rather than expose his swearing, sarcastic, no-nonsense self to his beloved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimT</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5747</link>
		<author>TimT</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5747</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;:`-(&lt;/b&gt;

*sniff*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>:`-(</b></p>
<p>*sniff*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asilon</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5748</link>
		<author>asilon</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5748</guid>
		<description>Hey, I didn't say they were perfect, just a bit more sane than the Indian article! I thought that bit about men preferring to text their partner when with other men showed what arses they can be when a group of them get together - the swearing sarcastic persona isn't necessarily their true self (hopefully). The patriarchy's still to blame for that too isn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I didn&#8217;t say they were perfect, just a bit more sane than the Indian article! I thought that bit about men preferring to text their partner when with other men showed what arses they can be when a group of them get together - the swearing sarcastic persona isn&#8217;t necessarily their true self (hopefully). The patriarchy&#8217;s still to blame for that too isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nia</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5749</link>
		<author>Nia</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5749</guid>
		<description>And reading between lines, what the study seems to suggest is that women tend to be more polite and articulate than men when sending text messages. Something as condensed as "how r u?" takes up 8 characters out of the 14 that makes the average woman's text message longer; adding a "C U, bye" adds nine. That's mere politeness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And reading between lines, what the study seems to suggest is that women tend to be more polite and articulate than men when sending text messages. Something as condensed as &#8220;how r u?&#8221; takes up 8 characters out of the 14 that makes the average woman&#8217;s text message longer; adding a &#8220;C U, bye&#8221; adds nine. That&#8217;s mere politeness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asilon</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5750</link>
		<author>asilon</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5750</guid>
		<description>* not that I think there's anything wrong with swearing and sarcasm - I love them both - I was just hoping that it's not the full extent of their personalities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* not that I think there&#8217;s anything wrong with swearing and sarcasm - I love them both - I was just hoping that it&#8217;s not the full extent of their personalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsKate</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5751</link>
		<author>MsKate</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5751</guid>
		<description>I blame it all on the war against boys in school and gender inequities on the SAT.  Men are traumatized because girls get better writing and English grades, so they are rendered inexpressive in text messaging too.  Damn feminist conspiracy interfering with stereotypical enjoyment of male-dominated electronic telecommunications modes!

I blame the matriarchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blame it all on the war against boys in school and gender inequities on the SAT.  Men are traumatized because girls get better writing and English grades, so they are rendered inexpressive in text messaging too.  Damn feminist conspiracy interfering with stereotypical enjoyment of male-dominated electronic telecommunications modes!</p>
<p>I blame the matriarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orange</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5752</link>
		<author>Orange</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5752</guid>
		<description>This post was way too long-winded. Couldn't you have used shorter words and less of that extraneous thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was way too long-winded. Couldn&#8217;t you have used shorter words and less of that extraneous thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hattie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5753</link>
		<author>Hattie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2005/11/15/nonsensical-chicksll-text-yer-ear-off/#comment-5753</guid>
		<description>Well, the women I text with are mostly terse to the point of being enigmatic. Just shows what mysterious creatures we women are. The men I know, on the other hand, go on and on, oblivious to audience, trying to pound their argument home.  Point? You choose your sample and make your huge generalizations, and behold, you have an opinion article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the women I text with are mostly terse to the point of being enigmatic. Just shows what mysterious creatures we women are. The men I know, on the other hand, go on and on, oblivious to audience, trying to pound their argument home.  Point? You choose your sample and make your huge generalizations, and behold, you have an opinion article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
