Monthly Archive for December, 2005

Study of the Week: Me Time, You Jane


When was the last time you had a big steamin' bowl of clam stew with tasso and fennel? Well that's too long.

Are you sitting down? Because here’s a shocker:

Britain is a nation of Homer Simpsons. The stereotypical image of the indolent husband, reclining on the sofa, beer in hand, while his wife copes with children and work has been confirmed by a new study revealing that men have twice as much ‘me time’ as women.”

“Me time” sounds like what Tarzan would say to Jane when she explains she’d really rather go to sleep, but it actually refers to an uninterrupted interval during which an adult individual exercises absolute sovereignty over her own mind and person. It is also a chimera.

Women, according to today’s study, get only 3 hours of “me time” a day. When I read this stunning figure I immediately calculated the amount of “me time” I get. It amounts to about 33 hours a day. I could maybe subsist on as little as 25.4 me-time hours a day, but that would really be pushing it. So the idea that women are out there me-timing at a scant one-eighth the required minimum rate, and feeling guilty about it to boot, brings tears of sympathetic madness to my eyes.

The nuclear family, which places the burden of incessant grunt work exclusively on a lone woman who has been stripped of absolute personal sovereignty, is a warped, artificial, and deeply misogynist structure.

Happy new year.

De Spread of Debauch


Even Shiva (or is it Nataraja?) can't resist hot god-on-pole action. Thanks, Maxim!

Maxim magazine, beloved bastion of women’s naked pole-dancing empowerment, is exporting its important message–that true male fulfillment depends on a connoisseurship of airbrushed T&A–to India.

Lucky India! Perhaps now that backward hellhole of a subcontinent can retrain its recalcitrant female population to lovingly embrace the male gaze, just like their enlightened, surgically-enhanced western sisters. Because, let’s face it; until now Indian women have been woefully ignorant of the enormous sense of freedom and self-worth that obtains through sashaying around town in hot pants and stiletto heels in exchange for male approval. Would you believe that in India “men never touch a woman in public, unless she is elderly or sick”? I’m not even kidding!

That’s why, as any white liberal American Maxim reader will tell you, western culture is best! The editor of the new Indian Maxim lists the western-style commodities to be enjoyed magazinally by the “new urban male,” presumably in order of importance, as “wine, gadgets, cultural trends … and beautiful women.”

To the honky who dabbles in feminist rhetoric, the main problem with all those barbarian Hindus and Muslims and terrorists and what-have-yous over there is that they force their women to schlep around in too much fabric. It’s so sexist! It’s so oppressive! How the heck can such inhibited females ooze the kind of liberating sexmissive pornstar availability that earns a woman her rightful place in western society if nobody can see a red patent-leather thong sticking out of her butt-cheeks when she bends over the nonfat yogurt bin at the Piggly Wiggly?

Maxim can change all that. By introducing to a grateful nation the superior form of western sexism, it can help India repurpose its women. Oh, they’ll remain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the male state, all right, just like here, but now, because the male state will confer treats on them for compliance, they’ll be raunched-out sexbots at the same time!

Like any hostile takeover, this swapping out of one sort of tyranny for another may require a period of adjustment, since Indian men are “more educated, literate, and tasteful” than the average western metropalooka. Maxim will start by replacing the outdated “typical coy, sari-clad Bollywood pose” with the “scantily clad woman who looks directly at the camera.” And then everything will fall into place.

Imagine the rush of liberated well-being that will seize her like a sweaty palm when that first lucky young Indian woman lands a job at the New Delhi Hooters–for where Maxim leads, Hooters fears not to tread–and experiences first-hand the joy of getting her ass pinched by an appreciative member of the ruling class of dogbreathed drunk businessmen. Tears of fierce pride will well up in her Maybellined eyes when she tells her worried women’s studies friends with a wave of her French manicure to lighten up, that feminism is for angry frigid dykes, that she’s making shitloads of dough, that she’s getting her boobs done to please herself, and that she bought that $600 leather bustier mainly, you know, for other women.

And soon no middle-class Indian rec room will be without its brass pole.

{Gracias, ArsePoetica}

Pop-Up Windows, Missing Comments, a Taco, and Sentimental Goopings


Pinnacle of the taco de pollo maker's art: the Frontera Fundido with salsa doña.

A couple of remarks to our treasured contributors:

• Just a reminder that the pop-up window what pops up when you comment is a harmless bug. Yes, it’s irritating, and a relentless auspice of my flawed intellect, but it’s non-fatal, and will not prevent you leaving your insightful remarks right where they belong. Please ignore it until I can figure out how to get rid of it, or at least change it to read “Fuck The Patriarchy.” Which will undoubtedly take a while.

• Thanks (and I do mean thanks) to the kind attention of established bloggers and all-around good eggs BitchPhD, Amanda, Norbizness, Lauren, Chris, Ampersand, and the Feministing girls, I Blame The Patriarchy has skyrocketed in popularity, smashing all previous blogular patriarchy-blaming records. I’m up to like 8 page views a day! But with great success comes great responsibility. So I’m auditioning various blogbots that are supposed to keep the comments free of both spam and trolls who can’t spell “feminazi.” Currently the callow young bot is set to require moderation for comments that contain (a) more than two links, (b) certain spammy idioms, and (c) the word “gisher.” Until I get the kinks worked out, the system may inadvertently throw your innocent young comment in the pokey. Do not despair. I will free it as soon as I get back from my golf game, and then we’ll throw it a party. The goal, of course, is to avoid having to make everybody register, although this may prove to be a chump’s game.

• And now for the Sentimental Goopings. You guys make me proud to be a patriarchy-blamer. Yup, it’s true. You’re witty and gallant and you understand when I cain’t post fer barfin and you’re indulgent when I inadvertently misspell Czech Republic “Czechoslovakia” and you send me emails and hats and books and shower curtains with pictures of meat on’em. You’ve all helped take the sting out of what, let’s face it, has been a fairly grueling quarter here at the Twisty Bungalow. What more–besides cash–could a gentleman farmer and spinster aunt ask from a bunch of total strangers? Thank you all for an enlightening and entertaining and highly blogulent 2005.

• Oh, and I’ve mentioned it before, but a special shout-out goes to Chris Clarke, who, with no thought for his own safety, gave the Gift of Chocolate to a gal who never cared about chocolate before. Seriously. I’m not even kidding. Those Recchiuti chockies have changed my life. I’m a fawken demon for the things. Yall gotta try’em. I’m not even kidding.

When I Was A Douchebag


Actual douchebags

All this talk of douchebags has put me in a nostalgic humor. Viz:

Unless you are in a rock band, or used to be in a rock band, and therefore know the torment that is the Band Photo, you probably won’t find The Hall Of Douchebags too hilarious. I do, though, despite the site’s deeply retarded sexist tone. Arrested development, alas, is the cornerstone of the Local Rock Band Industry.

Anyway, the deal is people send in band photos and these Rock And Roll Confidential guys mercilessly deride them with mocking captions.

There are so many band photos in existence because of a pervasive myth in the local rock band industry. This myth states that a local rock band must have a press kit. A press kit is a manila envelope containing the aforementioned photo, your band bio (which must include the phrase “The Massengills burst on the scene in 2002 with a totally unique sound reminiscent of the MC5 and Kleenex!”), a few press clippings written by your friends at the local newsweekly, and a copy of the CD you produced in your basement. All local rock bands send press kits to record stores, radio stations, booking agents, clubs in hip cities they’ll never play, SXSW, and newspapers. Which is a mystery, because the last time anybody ever actually looked at a press kit (except to make fun of the photos and bios) was in 1946. The CDs instantly get thrown in the trash. Ask anyone.

See if you can spot La Twisty in this Hall of Douchebags photo!

I definitely blame the patriarchy for that tutu.

Email From Gisher!

Here’s an email I received yesterday out of the wild blue yonder that manages to be both threatening and solicitous at the same time. I am “reprinting” it here, not because I have the faintest idea what the heck its author is talking about, but because he expressly forbids that I do so and ain’t no unsolicited jagoff the boss of me.

A side note: he says his blog has “zero bias,” which, if true, means he is Jesus!

I am a fellow member of Technocrati [sic], and I would love to swap links with your site. Please review mine, and if acceptable let me know. I have included © in this email as not doing it got me a bunch of publicity recently, which is nice but i need links. If you wish to reprint this email, please ask first, I may agree. May. Warning, my site has zero bias so if you read a story you think goes against your position read further. I use satire alot too.

Sincerely,
Gisher
[link removed per Gisher's request--ed.]
reverendgisher@yahoo.com

Clean, Fresh Patriarchy-in-a-Box


This one smells like Country Baby Powder Flowers

You know what I haven’t been paying any attention to because of North Korean slave labor in the Czech Republic [check], and the loony idea that if men guard women in prisons somebody’s gonna end up raped [check], and the fact that Pope Ratzi is truly a tool of the Dark Side [check], and this bizarre poll tallying Saudi support for allowing women to drive [check]?

Douching.

I always wanted to start a band called The Massengills, but frankly I was unaware that anybody actually still believes their vagina capable of filling up with dirt to the extent that they need to hose it out with storebought chemicals.

I could not have been more wrong.

According to Reuters, which quotes some obscure medical journal, over one-fourth of American women “of childbearing age” (which I guess means between, what, 11 and 75?) regularly become so disgusted by their own pussies that they muck’em out with foreign substances. Naturally there are “health professionals” afoot. They’re attempting to stem the tide of douche fluid flowing across young American loins. “Cut it out!” is their refrain. “Vagina clean thyself!”

Please, those of you with legitimate medical disorders for whom douching has saved your life–for I didn’t just roll off of the bloggy truck yesterday and I know that you, the Feminist Douche Activists, are out there, waiting, with your purulent birth canals and your hand-knitted douche bags and your flared-nostril outrage that feminists all too often dismiss your concerns when dissing douching–please, put a sock in it. I don’t mean you.

I mean perfectly healthy young women who are apparently still being told they are naturally unclean. Knock it off, girls. Your vagina doesn’t stink; what stinks is country baby flower perfume manufactured in New Jersey! For you post-coital straight girls, the impulse to get rid of that gross snotglob of semen is understandably acute, but the wiser course of action is to avoid acting in the capacity of its repository in the first place. That’s what rubbers are for! Tell that dude “no glove, no love.” Or better yet, dump him!

Not only is douching is a crappy form of contraception, it causes microbial imbalances in the vagina, it causes emotional imbalances in the brain, it causes infections, it costs money, and it is a tool of the patriarchy.

I’ll tell you what my Great Aunt Holly “Clitoris” Faster told me: Never stick anything in your pussy, girls, that you wouldn’t stick in your mouth.

Author of Annoying Sports Theme: Icky Perv

Gary Glitter, convicted child porn enthusiast, pays $4000 to families of abused 11-year-old girls in Vietnam in exchange for dropped charges.

What a fucking knob.

Season’s Greetings

I almost forgot! It’s a Twisty Tradition! The annual holiday reading of the S.C.U.M. Manifesto. Pass it on!

Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and destroy the male sex.

More! More!

Bum Steer


Where can this "study" kiss my ass?

Three ideas beloved of Western civilization rolled into one: that there is something “wrong” with women’s asses, that this horrible deficiency can be fixed if only women would buy the right stuff, and that people should get grants to photograph hundreds of female butts [link].

One of the greatest female sartorial dilemmas – ‘does my bum look big in this?’ – is to be answered by a team of researchers.

Experts are launching what is thought to be the world’s first scientific study into how clothing can affect the appearance of the female rear.

The team from Heriot Watt University’s School of Textiles and Design in Scotland believes the study could have major implications for retailers.

Female volunteers wearing hundreds of different types of clothing will have their rears photographed for the study.

Participants will then be asked to look at the pictures to assess how big or small each model’s backside appears.

The study will examine how various designs, colours, patterns and fabric types affect perception of bottom size.

Dr Lisa Macintyre, who is leading the research, said four models had been chosen to provide as representative a sample as possible of female rears.

“There’s much discussion in the media of clothing styles that flatter the body and it’s generally accepted that enhancing body perception can improve confidence and self-esteem,” she said.

“But the factors behind this have never been fully investigated in a proper scientific manner.”

[Thanks, Laurel]

My War On Christmas

Twisty\'s age-appropriate warmup suit

I’ve been waging (a completely ineffectual) war on Christmas for 20 years, and I don’t care who knows it. I hate the jingle bells. I hate the sweaters. I hate the songs. I hate that sucky columnists fling around the phrase “Yes, Virginia, there is a _______ (gadget that slices mangos,” government conspiracy,” war on Christmas,” etc) and act all like they’ve just earned their 10-cents-a-word.

I hate the traffic jams around all the shop entrances that impede my access to barbecue or tacos.

I don’t send cards. I don’t hollowly intone the reciprocal “Merry Christmas” to total strangers who could give a fuck if I am merry or not. I don’t even give presents. Usually I just dispatch $500 to some seemingly deserving charity, inform the fam that somebody in Zimbabwe now owns a cow with our name on it, and call it a day (the aforementioned fam pretends to be deeply moved by this sporting gesture, but in two minutes they’ve forgotten all about it).

Until this year. Man-o-man, what came over me? Why did I even think about buying gifts? Because, see, my gifts stress people out. This year, for example, to augment the thrill of the Zimbabwe cow, I gave my mom what I thought was a foolproof present: three pairs of fantastic fluffy socks from Title 9. She thanked me, but expressed her anxiety that these socks are so fluffy she doubts she’ll be able to wear them. In other words, she actively disliked these excellent fluffy socks.

She gave me a coral-pink warmup suit. In cashmere. I could be wrong, and I will of course consult the Manolo before doing anything rash, but it looks like I now require a pair of gold lamé Chanel sneakers and a condo in Boca.

One of the more touching aspects of Christmas is the way the cozy warmth of the holly-jolly season occasions extra violence against women. Staffers at Indiana women’s shelters are steeling themselves for an upsurge as two of patriarchy’s most beloved ideologies–misogyny and consumerism–clash at this magical time of year. The result, in terms of battered women, is described as “a spike in domestic violence incidents as tensions over finances and other stresses intensify.” You know. When your wife spends too much on cheap crap from China, or when your mom berates you in front of the whole family, or when your white male privilege generally fails to live up to the hype, just break your bitch’s jaw.

The corollary, which explains the eerie phenomenon of empty shelters on Christmas, is even creepier. “Some women” quoth a shelter director, “decide to endure abuse on Christmas because they want their children to be home for the holiday.” Indianapolis cops predict that after this lull the regularly scheduled violent outbursts will “escalate during the post-holiday letdown.”

Triumph of marketing: the Xmas consumer orgy is so profoundly integral to the American sense of, I don’t know what, middle class identity maybe, that women are willing to get beat up so their kids can enjoy the frenzy. And this colossal American Xmas narrative is so mesmerizing there’s even an official “letdown” afterward. A letdown wherein the crushing reality of one’s drinking problem or the unattainable hotness of a coworker’s wife or the unpayability of one’s bills all comes flooding back, requiring one to beat the crap out of one’s wife.

Ho fucking ho.