Monthly Archive for January, 2006

The Scallop of Gothos

My favorite thing to do, when my life intersects with four giant sea scallops, is to sauté those scallops in butter, deglaze with white wine, administer liberal quantities of gremolata, and stuff them down the Twisty craw while watching Star Trek (TOS) reruns.

I know, I know.

If, like me, you have the stomach lining of a 95-year-old alcoholic skid row bum, I advocate marinating the raw garlic portion of your gremolata in lemon juice for half an hour before combining with the parsley and lemon zest. You might also stir a couple of Pepcids into the sauce.

Men Hate You

Cancer is Sexy!
Speaking of cancer, what’s with this retarded sexy-cancer image at NewScientist.com? Do I really need to trot out the picture of what cancer really looks like?

Or: “Jesus appeared to me on a grilled cheese sandwich, and lo he did say unto me that cervical cancer prevents premarital sex.”

Germaine Greer says women have no idea how much men hate them. I’ve been doing my best to spread the word, but let’s face it; I’m just a churlish tree falling in the forest. With no pope taking a shit nearby to hear me, I might as well be espousing tube tops to Godly Josh.

But really, girls. Men hate you.

Still, as Kunte “Geordi LaForge” Kinte says on “Reading Rainbow,” you don’t have to take my word for it. Just take a gander, if you can stomach it, at the news. If the new American compulsory-pregnancy Supreme Court doesn’t convince you of Dude Nation’s contempt for you, and if Chicago’s “rape epidemic” leaves you unfazed, how about this Australian knob? He’s pitching a tent for the schizoid American Godbag Family Anti-Sex/Fetus Worship Coalition’s position on the new HPV vaccine. Which vaccine, if you’re just joining us, is expected to be 100% effective in preventing cervical cancer. Health advocates want to include the vaccine in the standard bundle of shots that all kiddies get. Godbags just hate this vaccine.

Why do godbags hate a vaccine that will save the lives of half a million women a year?

Because, duh, they hate women.

To recap: HPV is sexually transmitted. The aforementioned vaccine, in order to be most effective, should be administered to girls before they become sexually active. Which is seen by godbags as an endorsement of female teenage boning. Godbags, although they rarely take a position on male teenage boning, are 100% dead set against female teenage boning. They believe it will, as reader Liz suggested in a recent email, melt the fabric of society (I can understand why they might fear this melting, since they buy all the cheap polyester fabric of their society at Wal-Mart).

Because HPV is sexually-transmitted, and because women are the sex class, the virus is automatically a girl-problem. And behold! Where girls and sex collide, there you will find a clump of patriarchy-loving assholes making up rules. Godbags naturally default to slut-punishing mode when encountering scary science that might help to confer human status on women. The myth of female virtue is the cornerstone of patriarchy. A pussy unpoliced will lead to hard drugs, communism, homosexuality, rampant stuffing of newborns into trash cans, and what have you.

But come ON. Does fear of cervical cancer even register on a teenage girl’s radar as a fornicational deterrent? The contingency is remote. Even so, Focus on the Fetus et al would prefer that those dirty sluts grow up to die of hideous cancer.

That’s how much they hate you.

[Thanks for the Australian knob link, Liz]

“Dark Age” is the new “Enlightenment,” Part 2


Jimmy Griffin: gettin’ married

And then there was the conversation I had the other night with one of my favorite old slacker bandmates. I had just sparked up a chunk-o-chronic (medicinal!) and was watching one of those sexy-autopsy-cop shows with the sound off—they’re hideous, yet I can’t look away!—when the phone rang. It was H. He was drunkdriving home from a Bottle Rockets show in Chicago in the rain.

We chatted of this and that. Our old bass player is playing in a famous band now. Our other old bass player—”the one you made me fire”—is now in a band that isn’t famous but which miraculously doesn’t suck because said old bass player has finally stopped wearing khaki Dockers onstage. Our other other old bass player (known to readers of this blog as “Finn”) is playing in SXSW this year. H had fun teching for Son Volt in Albuquerque. H’s new project will be playing out in March (“project” is musician patois meaning “new band that probably won’t go anywhere because it’s a lot more fun to think this stuff up than to actually practice”).

“We’ll see what happens,” he said about the new band. “It’ll either be fucking awesome or a total disaster.”

“I don’t doubt it.”

“I wanted to call you before,” he said, “but I didn’t wanna talk about cancer.”

“Who does?”

“I might be getting married next week.”

“Oh? How come?”

“Or next month. Maybe. I don’t know, I don’t know. I didn’t want to tell you. I knew what you’d—”

“Oh, fuck that.” My views on the bogosity of matrimony are well known, to the extent that my friends are afraid to tell me when they elect to conform to this patriarchal mandate. “When did this happen?”

“I’ve never been this close to gettin’ married, really.”

“What about,” I wondered, “that time you got married before?”

“Except for that time. Hey, you know who’s gettin’ married?”

“Uhhh. You?” I was sitting on the floor with my golden retriever puppy Bert’s butt in my lap, trying to work an unsightly mat out of his nether region. Bert, as yet intact, was eyeing the scissors with suspicion.

“Maybe. No. I mean, Jimmy Griffin!” Jimmy Griffin is a legendary glam rock guitarist of our acquaintance.

“Hey, didn’t you just say that you—”

“Can you believe Jimmy Griffin’s getting married? Can you believe that? He was always such a player!”

I tried to recollect whether I had ever considered Jimmy Griffin’s matrimonial prospects. “I don’t think I—”

“Did you ever think that guy would get married?”

“Hey, here’s a thought: screw Jimmy Griffin. Who have you never been closer to maybe or maybe not marrying next week or next month?” I required this information.

H never comes right out and says anything unless it has to do with an oderiferous bodily emanation emitted by him personally. It’s part of his charm.

“I’m sick of fucking around,” he said. Then told me how he’d quit drinking for a month. It was a good experiment, he said. He might try it again.

“Who are you marrying, goddammit?”

Eventually the name was divulged.

“She’s a sweet little thing,” H said. “She’s sexy.”

I snipped Bert’s mat, narrowly missing his you-know-what.

“I like her,” said H. He sounded kind of gurgly, or maybe it was the Illinois rain.

I looked up and observed that on the TV, as always, a pale, beautiful, female corpse was laid out on a slab.

Hot New Blog

I’ve been invited to join the Churlish Feminist blog! Here’s my first, and I suspect, my last, post.

The Dark Age is the New Enlightenment, Part 1

There can no longer be any doubt that we’re all on languishing on the edge of a Dark-Age-calibre penumbra of politics and philosophy and art and dog-breeding and salad greens. Because I am an ass—which is to say I’m an average human—I’ve been in denial about the advent of this Dark Age, even as 9/11 turned the American president into a half-witted toxic avenger and intellectuals into reviled villains and French fries into “freedom fries.” Then came Enron and Schiavo and Alito and Abramoff and “America’s Top Model.” I winced, but looked the other way. But as of this morning three more globs of incontrovertible evidence had beached themselves on the craggy rocks at Twisty Point, and suddenly I can’t ignore the Dark Age no more. It’s here, and it’s severe.

Evidence such as:

NPR says that the European Union, in the wake of recent interesting Palestinian parliamentary developments, is shitting several bricks over the “islamification” of the Middle East. It’s sinking in that democratically-elected governments can be even worse than the despotic regimes they replace, and that no christian honky European democracy is immune. How hilarious will it be when France gets islamified, and Parisiennes who don’t want acid thrown on’em have to wear Chanel burkas?

What’s creepy is that Hamas isn’t philosophically all that different from the Bush administration, in terms of both godbaggery and terrorosity. Godbags-in-chief manipulate their peasantry to accept oppression by rewarding unenlightened fundamentalism and punishing iconoclasm. Bush, Hamas, what’s the diff? Godbags are godbags. It’s only a matter of degree. The US oppresses and maims and kills more people in a day than Hamas has even dreamed of oppressing and maiming and killing.

Then I read in the Daily Mail that Britain has undergone a “moral awakening” resulting in a desperate nationwide desire to make abortions harder to get. This attitude, which derives from the venerable godbag concept of punishing sluts, is indicative of the misogynist sensation that’s sweepin’ my own nation. A successful Dark Age demands state control of uteruses.

Then I heard a snippet of some radio show Ray Suarez is doing on intelligent design. Seriously discussing it, as though intelligent design is anything other than 15th century psuedo-science! Quoth some redneck mother (not to be confused with our Redneck Mother) “As long as they teach my kids that God created man and we didn’t evolve from no apes I don’t care!”

[Note: Because my copy editor is taking a cruise on the QE2, and I can't tell the difference between the "draft" and "publish" buttons, this post appeared earlier in a slightly different form. Sorry for any confusion.]

A Tawdry Lunch


34th St Cafe, Austin

A thousand pardons. Yesterday’s post on the frozen dinner was whiney and repulsive. We both deserve better. So, as an antidote, I could do naught but to hie to the 34th St Cafe and get outside a so-called “Chinese hack salad.” What’s a Chinese hack? Hell if I know. I do know that this isn’t so much a salad as a species of giant, inside-out spring roll garnished with about 47 pounds of barbecued chicken. It is a gaudy, meretricious dish behind the concept and execution of which I throw my wholehearted support.

Although on accounta the chile sauce, today I pay the piper.

I hate that fucking piper. He thinks that just because he’s a virtuoso he can charge whatever the fuck he wants.

My Bland and Frozen Hell

One of the many untoward effects of my chemotherapy is that it has afflicted my tongue and delicate esophageal tissues with a highly disagreeable intolerance for anything the slightest bit piquant. At first I rebelled, but eventually, for the sake of my stomach lining, I had to cave. Wine, even really good wine, causes spasms of pain. Delicious tacos: a no-go. Ginger, salt, pepper, garlic, onions, chile: negatory.

Yup. I’m on a Bland Diet. Which poses serious problems, since I don’t know how to drink anything except really good wine, and I don’t know how to cook anything without ginger, salt, pepper, garlic, onions, or chile. And neither does any chef within a 40-mile radius of Austin.

Yesterday I was too lazy to go to the grocery store, and too bushed to go out to dinner, and the thought of another plate of buttered egg noodles made my left eye twitch. Hunger pangs eventually drove me to fish around in the Twisty freezer until I found this: Vegetarian Meatloaf Dinner. I put on a hazmat suit, lifted it out with tongs, and held it at arm’s length for inspection. It appeared guaranteed to have no flavor whatsoever. I turned on the oven.

Here’s what it looked like on the box:

Here’s what it looked like when I took it out of the box:

Here’s what it looked like 45 minutes at 400 degrees later:

I will spare you a description of the “meatloaf’s” flavor and texture, lest you weep uncontrollably for the epicurean in me dying a slow, screaming death.

Dork Takes Issue With My “Tone”

This moron Richard Ames, who, incidentally, nurses quite the little obsession with Bitch.PhD.’s banner graphic, thinks I’m “churlish” for suggesting that the glazed, bloodshot eyes of the male gaze oughta be poked out.

Poor, dim fellow. He sadly confuses my implementation of a secret lesbian poetic device called personification with a literal call to Gloucesterize the world’s male population.

Gloucesterize is sort of a pun, by the way, since “–ize” rhymes with “eyes.” Dig it!

Richard Ames also irked that other “shrill” feminists, some of whom have apparently had the unmitigated shrillness to call him a “misogamist,” don’t understand the first thing about PR. In a stunning burst of originality, he opines that if only we were less shrill, we might persuade more people over to our side.

In other words, if men are conditioned from birth to treat women as subhuman sexbots, don’t come cryin’ to him. We feminsists should just be more conciliatory if we want men to knock it off already with all the rapes and beatings and harassment and objectification and shit. It’s because we’re so shrill that men act like barbarians.

The knob Richard Ames’ argument is untenable. He’s clearly just jealous of my new fighting technique, which is unstoppable.

I would have challenged him personally, but he has churlishly turned his comments off, so I guess I’ll just have to call him out before you, my 5000 daily readers.

Update: I have found a whole blog called Shrillblog, which appears to be dedicated to chronicling the shrillness of public figures, most of whom are not, cookies having crumbled the way they do, radical feminists.

In Which The Author Bottoms Out

Man-o-man. Contrary to what you might imagine, moderating a radical feminist blog (or “radfemblo,” as they’re known in the biz) is no tiptoe through the tulips. I read every single comment with my own personal eyes, and I’m here to tell ya, it’s not all lighthearted phluph like “14% of American women and girls live in poverty, which is 40% higher than the poverty rate for men, you ignorant conservative fucks,” or “abortion is a human right, you ignorant godbag fucks,” or “half a million women were raped in 100 days in Rwanda, you ignorant racist fucks.”

Sometimes, in fact, it can get pretty hairy.

Such as the comments on a couple of recent posts that ended up as discussions on BDSM.

OK, unlike the Bush administration and the New York Times and Oprah, I’m not gonna lie to you; I was getting pretty fawken creeped out by the pathologically violent fantasy lives described by some of our kinkier readers on whether flogging and corsets and Risk Aware Consensual Kinkiness represent the last word in women’s liberation.* In fact, I was this close to taking a 3-hour decontamination shower when, lo! I chanced upon a comment by reader LMYC, whose delightful remarks I republish here as an antidote to the seriously grody slime that had begun swirling around unbidden in the Twisty obstreperal lobe as a result of my having slogged through all those “flogging-as-intimate-communication” comments.

Thanks, LMYC.

[Note: this is the last post on this topic, I swear; I don't wanna get nominated for a Koufax in the Most Explicit New Bondage Blog category]

[Another note: to BDSM practioners, nothing personal, kids. Note that the title of the blog is I Blame The Patriarchy, not I Blame Individual Fetishists]

——————————————–

Well. As a loud-ass bitch who is about as dominant as it’s possible to be, I can also tell you that the [BDSM] “scene” was not the bastion of anti-patriarchal transgression that it paints itself as.

I’m dominant. For a time, I thought it might be possible for me to find some sort of niche in BDSM.

Then I realized that it was just another way for ME to have the responsibility dumped on me again to become some goddamned spoiled brat male’s fantasy toy. Or perhaps someone ELSE in this oh-so-like-with-it scene can explain to me why PRECISELY it is that both female submissives AND female dominants are expected to wear EXACTLY THE SAME CLOTHING.

Corset? Let me tell you sumpin, cheeks. Being a dominant woman means that MY COMFORT IS PARAMOUNT. I ain’t pinching my skinny ass in half so some paunchy blobby middle-aged old fart can get off. He wants to be submissive? Then go join a gym and tighten your blobby ass up until YOU look like MY fantasy. How’s that? Oh, and BTW, I’m staying in my sweatpants. Get back to the gym and tighten up those abs baby, you’re starting to sag. And why isn’t my dinner ready?

And while we’re at it, you can fucking well hand over 95% of the Senate, the presidency for the next 223 years, the boards of directors for every fortune 500 company in existence, and make one third less money than I do for doing the same fucking job. You want submission? You got it.

If I’m a dominant woman, I want to be dominant in the way that COUNTS, not in a closed room with the shades pulled where it’s recognized as safely disconnected from reality. I want to make a shitload of money, own the governments of almost every nation on the planet, own nearly every square meter of the Earth. I don’t want some pissass “power” connected to wearing shoes that crumple up my feet and some bustier that shoves my tits up under my chin. Embodying YOUR fantasy isn’t MY idea of power.

That about encapsulates my experience as a REAL dominant woman in the “scene,” not just some airhead who playacts at being in charge when Mr. Sir says it’s okay. It’s just one more arena where women are expected to inhabit male fantasies and run hot and cold like running water for male preferences. FUCK that noise.

BDSM is truly anti-patriarchal like Madonna and Britney Spears swapping spit at the Grammys was truly lesbian. To wit:

If you’re only allowed to be in charge when the man hands you money to say it’s okay, YOU ARE NOT IN CHARGE. If being in charge requires that you wear punitive clothing, YOU ARE NOT IN CHARGE.

—————————————-
* This argument, I am happy to report, is untenable; nothing as dorky as BDSM could possibly further any cause, except possibly orgasm, which, as I have noted elsewhere, is hardly the pinnacle of human achievement. Furthermore, there are obvious racist overtones in the almost constant use of the phrase “vanilla sex.”

Profiles in Astonishing Ignorance

About four hundred sixty-seven of you have written to thunder against that foul-excrescence-masquerading-as-a-kid in Massachusetts who filed a civil rights complaint alleging that, because there are lots of girls on the honor roll, his school discriminates against—you guessed it—boys. Somebody apparently told this lazy little shit’s parents about that idiot “research” supposedly showing that boys are genetically incapable of sitting still for more than 2 minutes at a time, which is why all but 2% of them flunk out of school every year, creating that vast uneducated male underclass with which we are all so familiar. You know, the one that has resulted in the almost total lack of men in positions of power worldwide for the past 27 centuries.

Horribly, my grueling spinster auntly schedule will not permit me to dedicate myself to a properly vituperative essay ripping on this atonishing absurdity. Fortunately Amanda has summed up my views precisely in an essay that cannot be improved upon. Read it, if you haven’t already.

And if I read one more word about anybody’s sex life today I will probably die.