<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Butthead Aussie Fetalist Lacks Clue re: Globs of Cells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:56:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-11151</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-11151</guid>
		<description>Excellent news, Darky. Makes me wish we had some women in &lt;em&gt;our&lt;/em&gt; Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent news, Darky. Makes me wish we had some women in <em>our</em> Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkymac</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-11144</link>
		<dc:creator>darkymac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-11144</guid>
		<description>So I hung around here last night because I was monitoring the &quot;debate&quot; in the Australian Senate - which is the States&#039; House - over whether the godbag Health Minister should retain his stranglehold over registration of RU486.
We women around here are pretty pleased that the women in the Senate decided almost to a woman that we should be defended from the godbag Health Minister, and in so doing have taken us the first of two steps needed to get a Roman Catholic doctrinaire patsy out of our lives.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,18099566%5E601,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This article in The Australian&lt;/a&gt; (Murdoch owned) makes the best summary of the &quot;debate&quot;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5107528,00.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This picture&lt;/a&gt; is of four of the women in the Senate who defended women.  
They are from both rural and city electorates.   That&#039;s my lasses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I hung around here last night because I was monitoring the &#8220;debate&#8221; in the Australian Senate &#8211; which is the States&#8217; House &#8211; over whether the godbag Health Minister should retain his stranglehold over registration of RU486.<br />
We women around here are pretty pleased that the women in the Senate decided almost to a woman that we should be defended from the godbag Health Minister, and in so doing have taken us the first of two steps needed to get a Roman Catholic doctrinaire patsy out of our lives.<br />
<a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,18099566%5E601,00.html" rel="nofollow">This article in The Australian</a> (Murdoch owned) makes the best summary of the &#8220;debate&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5107528,00.jpg" rel="nofollow">This picture</a> is of four of the women in the Senate who defended women.<br />
They are from both rural and city electorates.   That&#8217;s my lasses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-8033</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-8033</guid>
		<description>I have to laugh so incredibly hard at those who claim that women who want the right to have abortions are selfish, as they are plenty of people WITH children who are extremely selfish themselves. If we&#039;re all so selfish anyway, why would pro-life people WANT us to be able to have children? That makes no sense either. Which is why I absolutely believe the patriarchy statements that surround women not being allowed to do what they want with their own bodies. The selfishness argument has no logic in it, and is totally hiding the &quot;other side&quot;. 

Also, aren&#039;t tumors just globs of cells too? Hahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to laugh so incredibly hard at those who claim that women who want the right to have abortions are selfish, as they are plenty of people WITH children who are extremely selfish themselves. If we&#8217;re all so selfish anyway, why would pro-life people WANT us to be able to have children? That makes no sense either. Which is why I absolutely believe the patriarchy statements that surround women not being allowed to do what they want with their own bodies. The selfishness argument has no logic in it, and is totally hiding the &#8220;other side&#8221;. </p>
<p>Also, aren&#8217;t tumors just globs of cells too? Hahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tess</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-8025</link>
		<dc:creator>Tess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-8025</guid>
		<description>Twisty:

How do you feel about women being oppressed via abortion, say China and India? Here the patriarchy asserts itself by aborting females.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twisty:</p>
<p>How do you feel about women being oppressed via abortion, say China and India? Here the patriarchy asserts itself by aborting females.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-8022</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-8022</guid>
		<description>Godbag, or whatever, you folks are sick with selfishness.  Can&#039;t blame you, after all you were formed by a sick culture.  I hope you can at least revere/respect the life of your child (evolved tumor) when it is born - will its worth be graduated for sex, ethnicity/race/Spanish language proficiency of it matrilineal line or the amount of career sacrifice demanded by the pregnancy?  Seems like it from reading you posts.

Nope, I&#039;m not a biological father, but the adoptive father of two girls whose mother had the bravery and grace to deliver in a country and society where it is easier - or even mandatory - to excise the little parasites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Godbag, or whatever, you folks are sick with selfishness.  Can&#8217;t blame you, after all you were formed by a sick culture.  I hope you can at least revere/respect the life of your child (evolved tumor) when it is born &#8211; will its worth be graduated for sex, ethnicity/race/Spanish language proficiency of it matrilineal line or the amount of career sacrifice demanded by the pregnancy?  Seems like it from reading you posts.</p>
<p>Nope, I&#8217;m not a biological father, but the adoptive father of two girls whose mother had the bravery and grace to deliver in a country and society where it is easier &#8211; or even mandatory &#8211; to excise the little parasites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kas</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-8021</link>
		<dc:creator>Kas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-8021</guid>
		<description>You know why Australian women don&#039;t already have access to RU-486? Because our fuckheaded government made a deal with a godbag senator back in the day: if they stopped RU-486, he would vote to let them privatise Telstra, the phone company.

And in the recent senate vote to ban compulsory student unionism (which pays for leftist stuff like university facilities and, oh, CHILD CARE) a representative of the repulsive &#039;Family First&#039; party suddenly and mysteriously changed his mind and voted with the government. Why? No one involved would say, but talk was it&#039;s because the fuckers threw him the bone of the continued non-approval of RU-486.

Because, of course, privatisation of government-owned companies and sticking it to those young potential lefties are far more important than, you know, women&#039;s lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know why Australian women don&#8217;t already have access to RU-486? Because our fuckheaded government made a deal with a godbag senator back in the day: if they stopped RU-486, he would vote to let them privatise Telstra, the phone company.</p>
<p>And in the recent senate vote to ban compulsory student unionism (which pays for leftist stuff like university facilities and, oh, CHILD CARE) a representative of the repulsive &#8216;Family First&#8217; party suddenly and mysteriously changed his mind and voted with the government. Why? No one involved would say, but talk was it&#8217;s because the fuckers threw him the bone of the continued non-approval of RU-486.</p>
<p>Because, of course, privatisation of government-owned companies and sticking it to those young potential lefties are far more important than, you know, women&#8217;s lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-8016</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-8016</guid>
		<description>Yes, let us discuss this whole topic of those damned procreating redneck bastards who, of course, had a choice in choosing the equipment placed between their legs! I mean, men are priviledged: before God commits us to a womb where hopefully we won&#039;t be prematurely killed, we get to choose whether we want a penis or not. Its quite amazing, I assure you.

And while we&#039;re on the topic of men&#039;s freedom to get away, perhaps you haven&#039;t considered that by making it solely YOUR choice and enveloping yourself in misandry, that perhaps you can only expect a male to feel no need for attachment. After all, it IS your choice, and men should butt out and shut the **** up. Men, in your view apparently, are only good for satisfying your sexual desires. For persons who so grudgingly talk about men, you are more than willing to sleep with them and then kill your mutually created offspring.

One also wonders how one claims to have such adamant possesion over their uterus and the contents of it, given they were rather freely giving of the equipment attached to it. One can only expect that when you let a man in there, that a baby shall eventually form. Its not like these fetuses popped out of thin air, YOU had an active hand in creating them. Biology 101 people, you&#039;re all presumably smart, educated women here.

One also wonders who should be going on about mass murders when abortions over 6 years, the same numerical period of time between 1939 and 1945(WWII), kill around the same number of human beings as the holocaust did, starting pretty much in 1975 where abortions went up to around 1.4 million per annum. It would appear in your own attempt to impugn others, you look over your own atrocities as irrelevant (they are, after all, despite overwhelming scientifically proven and verified evidence to the contrary, just clumps of cells).

As to the nature of America&#039;s government, it is a representative republic that does have majority rule, but the minority is protected by the provisions written out in the Constitution. Women are 51% of the populace. Minority my hat, if you all got together and voted (assuming all women held your opinion, which many do not) you&#039;d be able to outvote all these men you keep claiming have all the power. You simply use your self-imposed minority status because it is a good shield to hide behind while you lambaste what you consider is the source of all evil: The male penis. Perhaps if you stopped playing the gender card and started voting, this discrimination you sense would evaporate overnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, let us discuss this whole topic of those damned procreating redneck bastards who, of course, had a choice in choosing the equipment placed between their legs! I mean, men are priviledged: before God commits us to a womb where hopefully we won&#8217;t be prematurely killed, we get to choose whether we want a penis or not. Its quite amazing, I assure you.</p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re on the topic of men&#8217;s freedom to get away, perhaps you haven&#8217;t considered that by making it solely YOUR choice and enveloping yourself in misandry, that perhaps you can only expect a male to feel no need for attachment. After all, it IS your choice, and men should butt out and shut the **** up. Men, in your view apparently, are only good for satisfying your sexual desires. For persons who so grudgingly talk about men, you are more than willing to sleep with them and then kill your mutually created offspring.</p>
<p>One also wonders how one claims to have such adamant possesion over their uterus and the contents of it, given they were rather freely giving of the equipment attached to it. One can only expect that when you let a man in there, that a baby shall eventually form. Its not like these fetuses popped out of thin air, YOU had an active hand in creating them. Biology 101 people, you&#8217;re all presumably smart, educated women here.</p>
<p>One also wonders who should be going on about mass murders when abortions over 6 years, the same numerical period of time between 1939 and 1945(WWII), kill around the same number of human beings as the holocaust did, starting pretty much in 1975 where abortions went up to around 1.4 million per annum. It would appear in your own attempt to impugn others, you look over your own atrocities as irrelevant (they are, after all, despite overwhelming scientifically proven and verified evidence to the contrary, just clumps of cells).</p>
<p>As to the nature of America&#8217;s government, it is a representative republic that does have majority rule, but the minority is protected by the provisions written out in the Constitution. Women are 51% of the populace. Minority my hat, if you all got together and voted (assuming all women held your opinion, which many do not) you&#8217;d be able to outvote all these men you keep claiming have all the power. You simply use your self-imposed minority status because it is a good shield to hide behind while you lambaste what you consider is the source of all evil: The male penis. Perhaps if you stopped playing the gender card and started voting, this discrimination you sense would evaporate overnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suezboo</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-8011</link>
		<dc:creator>suezboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-8011</guid>
		<description>At last ! Comment world ! Twisty, I do think you should have told us you were &quot;conceded&quot;. It changes my whole worldview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last ! Comment world ! Twisty, I do think you should have told us you were &#8220;conceded&#8221;. It changes my whole worldview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-8002</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-8002</guid>
		<description>I actually don&#039;t give a shit if it&#039;s a baby or a glob of cells. If &lt;i&gt;either&lt;/i&gt; has taken up residence in my uterus, then I get to decide whether or not to keep it. Fuckall, if a &lt;i&gt;grownup&lt;/i&gt; attached himself and his phsyiological functions to your body, you would have the right to cut him the hell off and let him gasp (at least you would if you were a man)! 

I think the whole &quot;glob of cells&quot; argument misses the point. My body is my body, whatever or whoever gloms on, I still get to choose. 

Anyway, when I had a passenger, I called it the Pod. As in Invasion of the Body Snatchers. (Sometimes I called it Body Snatcher, but Pod was easier.) It made me eat. It made me sleep. It made me short of breath. It was a goddamn Pod.

Now that the Pod is 15 years old, I&#039;ve decided to keep him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually don&#8217;t give a shit if it&#8217;s a baby or a glob of cells. If <i>either</i> has taken up residence in my uterus, then I get to decide whether or not to keep it. Fuckall, if a <i>grownup</i> attached himself and his phsyiological functions to your body, you would have the right to cut him the hell off and let him gasp (at least you would if you were a man)! </p>
<p>I think the whole &#8220;glob of cells&#8221; argument misses the point. My body is my body, whatever or whoever gloms on, I still get to choose. </p>
<p>Anyway, when I had a passenger, I called it the Pod. As in Invasion of the Body Snatchers. (Sometimes I called it Body Snatcher, but Pod was easier.) It made me eat. It made me sleep. It made me short of breath. It was a goddamn Pod.</p>
<p>Now that the Pod is 15 years old, I&#8217;ve decided to keep him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/01/09/butthead-aussie-fetalist-lacks-clue-re-globs-of-cells/#comment-7977</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=401#comment-7977</guid>
		<description>Tess,
Well, that&#039;s just the thing, isn&#039;t it? The The right&#039;s main interest is the preservation of patriarchy, not, as many imagine, the &quot;sanctity of life&quot;. Patriarchy depends for its existence on controlling women, yes, but also on maintaining an underclass of untouchables, so compulsory pregnancy and subsequent abandonment of the results of such pregnancies fit nicely with this agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tess,<br />
Well, that&#8217;s just the thing, isn&#8217;t it? The The right&#8217;s main interest is the preservation of patriarchy, not, as many imagine, the &#8220;sanctity of life&#8221;. Patriarchy depends for its existence on controlling women, yes, but also on maintaining an underclass of untouchables, so compulsory pregnancy and subsequent abandonment of the results of such pregnancies fit nicely with this agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

