This moron Richard Ames, who, incidentally, nurses quite the little obsession with Bitch.PhD.’s banner graphic, thinks I’m “churlish” for suggesting that the glazed, bloodshot eyes of the male gaze oughta be poked out.
Poor, dim fellow. He sadly confuses my implementation of a secret lesbian poetic device called personification with a literal call to Gloucesterize the world’s male population.
Gloucesterize is sort of a pun, by the way, since “–ize” rhymes with “eyes.” Dig it!
Richard Ames also irked that other “shrill” feminists, some of whom have apparently had the unmitigated shrillness to call him a “misogamist,” don’t understand the first thing about PR. In a stunning burst of originality, he opines that if only we were less shrill, we might persuade more people over to our side.
In other words, if men are conditioned from birth to treat women as subhuman sexbots, don’t come cryin’ to him. We feminsists should just be more conciliatory if we want men to knock it off already with all the rapes and beatings and harassment and objectification and shit. It’s because we’re so shrill that men act like barbarians.
The knob Richard Ames’ argument is untenable. He’s clearly just jealous of my new fighting technique, which is unstoppable.
I would have challenged him personally, but he has churlishly turned his comments off, so I guess I’ll just have to call him out before you, my 5000 daily readers.
Update: I have found a whole blog called Shrillblog, which appears to be dedicated to chronicling the shrillness of public figures, most of whom are not, cookies having crumbled the way they do, radical feminists.