<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Dakota To Women: &#8220;Bend Over And Smile&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Comment du jour at I Blame The Patriarchy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-39169</link>
		<author>Comment du jour at I Blame The Patriarchy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-39169</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;I wish I had a button I could push everytime someone calls a 20-cell speck a baby which would cause a large slimy poisonous toad to land on their face.&#8221; [context] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;I wish I had a button I could push everytime someone calls a 20-cell speck a baby which would cause a large slimy poisonous toad to land on their face.&#8221; [context] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogHer [beta]</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-14071</link>
		<author>BlogHer [beta]</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-14071</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Around the Dial: "And so it begins..." The Supreme Court will review a late-term abortion procedure - Part 3&lt;/strong&gt;

The concluding post in a three-part series covering the response to the latest political news that the Supreme Court will review the constitutionality of banning a late-term abortion procedure.
I've stretched the parameters to include the recent South...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Around the Dial: &#8220;And so it begins&#8230;&#8221; The Supreme Court will review a late-term abortion procedure - Part 3</strong></p>
<p>The concluding post in a three-part series covering the response to the latest political news that the Supreme Court will review the constitutionality of banning a late-term abortion procedure.<br />
I&#8217;ve stretched the parameters to include the recent South&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luckynkl</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13542</link>
		<author>Luckynkl</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13542</guid>
		<description>Looks like Mississippi is next.

"Gov. Haley Barbour said Wednesday he would probably sign a bill under consideration in the state House that would ban most abortions in Mississippi.

The measure, which passed the House Public Health Committee on Tuesday, would allow abortion only to save a woman's life. It would make no exception in cases of rape or incest....

.....The full House could vote on the bill next week, and it would then go to the Senate.

    South Dakota lawmakers passed a similar bill last week that was intended to provoke a legal showdown over Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling establishing the right to an abortion. The measure is awaiting Republican Gov. Mike Rounds' signature. He has said he is inclined to sign it. "


Hmmm... it's too bad the mothers of these power and control freaks didn't decide to do us all a favor and abort these assholes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Mississippi is next.</p>
<p>&#8220;Gov. Haley Barbour said Wednesday he would probably sign a bill under consideration in the state House that would ban most abortions in Mississippi.</p>
<p>The measure, which passed the House Public Health Committee on Tuesday, would allow abortion only to save a woman&#8217;s life. It would make no exception in cases of rape or incest&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;..The full House could vote on the bill next week, and it would then go to the Senate.</p>
<p>    South Dakota lawmakers passed a similar bill last week that was intended to provoke a legal showdown over Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling establishing the right to an abortion. The measure is awaiting Republican Gov. Mike Rounds&#8217; signature. He has said he is inclined to sign it. &#8221;</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; it&#8217;s too bad the mothers of these power and control freaks didn&#8217;t decide to do us all a favor and abort these assholes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viveth</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13106</link>
		<author>viveth</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13106</guid>
		<description>I unfortunately live in Texas (for now) and I predict that this state will join SD in its assualt on women in short order.  This doesn't have to be 3rd world country to be barbaric.  

- They don't want to fund any kind of sex education
- They oppose and have routinely cut funding for public clinics that offer contraception
- They don't want to spend precious government pork-dollars on pre-natal care for the woman whose life they have hijacked.
- Their health care system can't cope with the cost of a birth to a too-young, unhealthy, and un-cared-for mother.
- Their health care system can't care for an infant born unhealthy due to lack of pre-natal care.
- They cut funding for school breakfasts offered to poor children.
- They punish poor school districts by taking away even more funding.
- Once again, they refuse to teach these unwanted, underfed, undereducated children how to stay unpregnant.

Where, exactly, is the gushing concern for the child here?  How can they claim this is about fetuses, children, morals, or responsibility?  This is all about crushing everything that is female, poor, or unprofitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I unfortunately live in Texas (for now) and I predict that this state will join SD in its assualt on women in short order.  This doesn&#8217;t have to be 3rd world country to be barbaric.  </p>
<p>- They don&#8217;t want to fund any kind of sex education<br />
- They oppose and have routinely cut funding for public clinics that offer contraception<br />
- They don&#8217;t want to spend precious government pork-dollars on pre-natal care for the woman whose life they have hijacked.<br />
- Their health care system can&#8217;t cope with the cost of a birth to a too-young, unhealthy, and un-cared-for mother.<br />
- Their health care system can&#8217;t care for an infant born unhealthy due to lack of pre-natal care.<br />
- They cut funding for school breakfasts offered to poor children.<br />
- They punish poor school districts by taking away even more funding.<br />
- Once again, they refuse to teach these unwanted, underfed, undereducated children how to stay unpregnant.</p>
<p>Where, exactly, is the gushing concern for the child here?  How can they claim this is about fetuses, children, morals, or responsibility?  This is all about crushing everything that is female, poor, or unprofitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Violet Socks</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13074</link>
		<author>Violet Socks</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13074</guid>
		<description>Oh, dear, louiseculmer is one of &lt;i&gt;those&lt;/i&gt;?  It seems I'm at quite the disadvantage not being able to stomach the Rape is a Gift thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, dear, louiseculmer is one of <i>those</i>?  It seems I&#8217;m at quite the disadvantage not being able to stomach the Rape is a Gift thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13065</link>
		<author>Chris Clarke</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13065</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;This site is, so I understand it, moderated. Therefore no post of mine is going to appear on here unless approved by the moderator. If you donâ€™t like what I write, take it up with her not me.&lt;/em&gt;

Would you say your desire to be submissive within your marriage stems from the same reluctance to take responsibility for your own actions as evidenced in the above sentence, or does it spring from another source altogether?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This site is, so I understand it, moderated. Therefore no post of mine is going to appear on here unless approved by the moderator. If you donâ€™t like what I write, take it up with her not me.</em></p>
<p>Would you say your desire to be submissive within your marriage stems from the same reluctance to take responsibility for your own actions as evidenced in the above sentence, or does it spring from another source altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13064</link>
		<author>Katherine</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13064</guid>
		<description>Lousieculmer - you live in a different UK to me.  Can I live in yours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lousieculmer - you live in a different UK to me.  Can I live in yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louiseculmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13060</link>
		<author>louiseculmer</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13060</guid>
		<description>This site is, so I understand it, moderated.  Therefore no post of mine is going to appear on here unless approved by the moderator.  If you don't like what I write, take it up with her not me.  if she chooses not to let my posts appear, that is up to her.

As for women being powerless in 'our' society, I live in the UK, where women are certainly not powerless.  We have the power to choose to enter any profession we like.  We can enter or leave any relationship we like.  If we get married and don't like it we can get divorced.  We can wear what we like, we don't have to go around dressed in bloody burquas or anything.  Nobody is going to stone us to death for committing adultery, or lock us up in prison if we choose to leave an abusive spouse.  I've done exactly as I liked all my life, and so have all the other women I know.

What society do you live in where women are so powerless?  I would love to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site is, so I understand it, moderated.  Therefore no post of mine is going to appear on here unless approved by the moderator.  If you don&#8217;t like what I write, take it up with her not me.  if she chooses not to let my posts appear, that is up to her.</p>
<p>As for women being powerless in &#8216;our&#8217; society, I live in the UK, where women are certainly not powerless.  We have the power to choose to enter any profession we like.  We can enter or leave any relationship we like.  If we get married and don&#8217;t like it we can get divorced.  We can wear what we like, we don&#8217;t have to go around dressed in bloody burquas or anything.  Nobody is going to stone us to death for committing adultery, or lock us up in prison if we choose to leave an abusive spouse.  I&#8217;ve done exactly as I liked all my life, and so have all the other women I know.</p>
<p>What society do you live in where women are so powerless?  I would love to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13041</link>
		<author>TC</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13041</guid>
		<description>Sorry for using your blog for this, Twisty.

But further natural abortion info is at this site: 
http://www.sisterzeus.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for using your blog for this, Twisty.</p>
<p>But further natural abortion info is at this site:<br />
<a href="http://www.sisterzeus.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sisterzeus.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AyMayZed</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13038</link>
		<author>AyMayZed</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/24/south-dakota-to-women-bend-over-and-smile/#comment-13038</guid>
		<description>louiseculmer,
You've sort of got the idea.
You've sort of got the language.
But you've missed the target by a huge margin.

All of your posts have a formula; the formula that door-knocking evangelists use;
the one that feigns a weary world experience and an all-accepting understanding of differences expressed by your captive householders when you have a foot in their door.
The laughable giveaway in your wee dribblings in &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; forum is that you have absolutely no language that rings true for the experience of someone who has &lt;i&gt; genuinely&lt;/i&gt; felt the revelation of recognising the powerless position of a woman in your society.
Not to mention that  you have such a heavy hand when you haul on the tiller to pull every post around to babies, babies,babies.   
And it has been laying me out with mirth to see your attempts to demonstrate a wider-than-the-choice-interest/ fellow-feeling with your sisters over there in the "When Rape is a Gift" thread.   Just trying to get credibility in here are you?
Have you any idea how clumsy you are? 

Don't you see that you're getting ignored?

Back to fundamentalist-infiltrator school with you now and don't come back without at least a C pass in dissembling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>louiseculmer,<br />
You&#8217;ve sort of got the idea.<br />
You&#8217;ve sort of got the language.<br />
But you&#8217;ve missed the target by a huge margin.</p>
<p>All of your posts have a formula; the formula that door-knocking evangelists use;<br />
the one that feigns a weary world experience and an all-accepting understanding of differences expressed by your captive householders when you have a foot in their door.<br />
The laughable giveaway in your wee dribblings in <i>this</i> forum is that you have absolutely no language that rings true for the experience of someone who has <i> genuinely</i> felt the revelation of recognising the powerless position of a woman in your society.<br />
Not to mention that  you have such a heavy hand when you haul on the tiller to pull every post around to babies, babies,babies.<br />
And it has been laying me out with mirth to see your attempts to demonstrate a wider-than-the-choice-interest/ fellow-feeling with your sisters over there in the &#8220;When Rape is a Gift&#8221; thread.   Just trying to get credibility in here are you?<br />
Have you any idea how clumsy you are? </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you see that you&#8217;re getting ignored?</p>
<p>Back to fundamentalist-infiltrator school with you now and don&#8217;t come back without at least a C pass in dissembling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
