<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do It Till You&#8217;re Satisfied</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:24:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One from the Spinster Aunt&#8217;s Archives &#171; Anti-Porn Feminists</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-152907</link>
		<dc:creator>One from the Spinster Aunt&#8217;s Archives &#171; Anti-Porn Feminists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-152907</guid>
		<description>[...]  Do it Till You&#8217;re Satisfied [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Do it Till You&#8217;re Satisfied [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web/Lint &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You got your Vagina on my Penis!</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-15624</link>
		<dc:creator>Web/Lint &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You got your Vagina on my Penis!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-15624</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s not often you get to actually see rhetorical insanity in action with this kind of clarity and passion. Now while Twisty over at I Blame the Patriarchy occasionally has flashes of reason and (dare I say it) a rare glimpse of objectivity - many of those drawn to the &#8220;all male bashing all the time&#8221; tenor of the blog have no such (minimal) redeeming quality. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s not often you get to actually see rhetorical insanity in action with this kind of clarity and passion. Now while Twisty over at I Blame the Patriarchy occasionally has flashes of reason and (dare I say it) a rare glimpse of objectivity &#8211; many of those drawn to the &#8220;all male bashing all the time&#8221; tenor of the blog have no such (minimal) redeeming quality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enter the Jabberwock - Campfire of the Vanities</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-13516</link>
		<dc:creator>Enter the Jabberwock - Campfire of the Vanities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-13516</guid>
		<description>[...] The subject of this post, entitled Do It Till You&#8217;re Satisfied, is BDSM and fetishism, and is apparently written in reaction to a debate which took place in the comments for the article discussed above. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The subject of this post, entitled Do It Till You&#8217;re Satisfied, is BDSM and fetishism, and is apparently written in reaction to a debate which took place in the comments for the article discussed above. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hedonist</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-13452</link>
		<dc:creator>hedonist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 01:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-13452</guid>
		<description>Good GAWDESS, Les, do you have to be such a literalist?  If you&#039;re putting on the Power Hat, you&#039;re worshipping at the Altar of the Dick.  Congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good GAWDESS, Les, do you have to be such a literalist?  If you&#8217;re putting on the Power Hat, you&#8217;re worshipping at the Altar of the Dick.  Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-13449</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-13449</guid>
		<description>Uh, so if I spank my girlfriend because it gets her off, WHOSE dick are we worshipping?  Cuz mine is usually in the sock drawer, which isn&#039;t a very good altar.

Or if she&#039;s spanking me, does THAT transform my sock drawer into an altar?

What sort of decorations should I place in my sock drawer to signify it&#039;s altar status?  Should I remove the worshiped silicon member from it&#039;s sock during these sessions?  Should it face in some ordinal direction for this worshipping?  Should I invoke any elements before hand?

In short, how do I mix neopagan rituals with the dildo-worshipping that surely must somehow figure into spanking?  

What if something happens to my dick and we still want to spank?  for example: If we go on a trip someplace and I leave my dick behind, does it get worshipped from a distance if there is spanking in a hotel room?  If my house burns down and my dick is destroyed in a fire and I don&#039;t replace it, is it worshipped from beyond the ashes?  If I boil it and then give it away, is it still being worshipped by us or must all worshipping originate from it&#039;s current owner?  My young friend has never owned a dildo, nor has her girlfriend.  If they spank each other, are they worshipping the future dicks they may one day own?

If two dykes have kinky sex behind closed doors that nobody ever hears about does it re-affirm the patriarchy?

This reminds me too much of anti-penetration bullshit from the 70&#039;s.  Women can only lie side by side, facing each other, simultaneously doing clitoral stimulation as the ONLY acceptable sex or the patriarchy is enforced.  Perhaps that&#039;s too patriarchal.  Maybe we should bask in each other&#039;s feminine glow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, so if I spank my girlfriend because it gets her off, WHOSE dick are we worshipping?  Cuz mine is usually in the sock drawer, which isn&#8217;t a very good altar.</p>
<p>Or if she&#8217;s spanking me, does THAT transform my sock drawer into an altar?</p>
<p>What sort of decorations should I place in my sock drawer to signify it&#8217;s altar status?  Should I remove the worshiped silicon member from it&#8217;s sock during these sessions?  Should it face in some ordinal direction for this worshipping?  Should I invoke any elements before hand?</p>
<p>In short, how do I mix neopagan rituals with the dildo-worshipping that surely must somehow figure into spanking?  </p>
<p>What if something happens to my dick and we still want to spank?  for example: If we go on a trip someplace and I leave my dick behind, does it get worshipped from a distance if there is spanking in a hotel room?  If my house burns down and my dick is destroyed in a fire and I don&#8217;t replace it, is it worshipped from beyond the ashes?  If I boil it and then give it away, is it still being worshipped by us or must all worshipping originate from it&#8217;s current owner?  My young friend has never owned a dildo, nor has her girlfriend.  If they spank each other, are they worshipping the future dicks they may one day own?</p>
<p>If two dykes have kinky sex behind closed doors that nobody ever hears about does it re-affirm the patriarchy?</p>
<p>This reminds me too much of anti-penetration bullshit from the 70&#8217;s.  Women can only lie side by side, facing each other, simultaneously doing clitoral stimulation as the ONLY acceptable sex or the patriarchy is enforced.  Perhaps that&#8217;s too patriarchal.  Maybe we should bask in each other&#8217;s feminine glow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delphyne</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-13447</link>
		<dc:creator>Delphyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-13447</guid>
		<description>&quot;but things that are polluted with patriarchy donâ€™t belong in feminism. I am polluted with patriarchy, so I now realized that I donâ€™t belong in feminism. in fact, anything that is polluted with patriarchy doesnâ€™t belong in feminism.&quot;

Well if you keep saying it *someone* might believe you, but it probably won&#039;t be a feminist.

We&#039;re all polluted by patriarchy, don&#039;t you get that?  What makes you think you are so special that feminism is going to pick on you personally and tell you you can&#039;t play?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but things that are polluted with patriarchy donâ€™t belong in feminism. I am polluted with patriarchy, so I now realized that I donâ€™t belong in feminism. in fact, anything that is polluted with patriarchy doesnâ€™t belong in feminism.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well if you keep saying it *someone* might believe you, but it probably won&#8217;t be a feminist.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re all polluted by patriarchy, don&#8217;t you get that?  What makes you think you are so special that feminism is going to pick on you personally and tell you you can&#8217;t play?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-13444</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-13444</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Thanks for that blanket statement, it was getting a little chilly in here.&lt;/em&gt;

Why not build a bonfire? There&#039;s plenty of straw men in here. And the goalposts have been moved so often they&#039;re pretty much useless. &lt;em&gt;They&lt;/em&gt; should burn pretty good, and maybe we could roast a couple of the dead horses, make cheval tacos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Thanks for that blanket statement, it was getting a little chilly in here.</em></p>
<p>Why not build a bonfire? There&#8217;s plenty of straw men in here. And the goalposts have been moved so often they&#8217;re pretty much useless. <em>They</em> should burn pretty good, and maybe we could roast a couple of the dead horses, make cheval tacos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienne</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-13442</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-13442</guid>
		<description>&#039;Itâ€™s insulting and inaccurate.&#039;

You have your experiences, I have mine. My experiences are consistent with what I have stated. If you are insulted you should be. So am I. 

â€¦A Handmaid&#039;s Tale, how amusing. No Iâ€™ve never read it and do not have any desire to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Itâ€™s insulting and inaccurate.&#8217;</p>
<p>You have your experiences, I have mine. My experiences are consistent with what I have stated. If you are insulted you should be. So am I. </p>
<p>â€¦A Handmaid&#8217;s Tale, how amusing. No Iâ€™ve never read it and do not have any desire to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alyx</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-13439</link>
		<dc:creator>alyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-13439</guid>
		<description>&quot;The â€œkoâ€ at the end of â€œpankoâ€(breadcrumbs) is not the same â€œkoâ€ used for the names, but a different â€œkoâ€ meaning â€œcrumbsâ€ or â€œflakes,â€ as in snowflakes. The chinese characters used is different.&quot;

Ahh, see, I DON&#039;T have a linguistics degree! :0)

Thanks for clearing that up, Rain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The â€œkoâ€ at the end of â€œpankoâ€(breadcrumbs) is not the same â€œkoâ€ used for the names, but a different â€œkoâ€ meaning â€œcrumbsâ€ or â€œflakes,â€ as in snowflakes. The chinese characters used is different.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ahh, see, I DON&#8217;T have a linguistics degree! :0)</p>
<p>Thanks for clearing that up, Rain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Crowley</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/02/28/501/#comment-13437</link>
		<dc:creator>J Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=501#comment-13437</guid>
		<description>You know, if anyone here sounds like fundamentalists, it&#039;s not the advocates of &quot;people should be able to do what they want in the bedroom&quot;.  Ever read &quot;A Handmaid&#039;s Tale&quot;, by any chance?

You&#039;re conflating personal irresponsibility of individuals with some kind of widespread mentality that exists in every man.  It&#039;s insulting and inaccurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, if anyone here sounds like fundamentalists, it&#8217;s not the advocates of &#8220;people should be able to do what they want in the bedroom&#8221;.  Ever read &#8220;A Handmaid&#8217;s Tale&#8221;, by any chance?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re conflating personal irresponsibility of individuals with some kind of widespread mentality that exists in every man.  It&#8217;s insulting and inaccurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

