Comments on: Bill Napoli Is A Fucking Perv

By: Rad Geek People’s Daily / Abortion on demand and without apology (Dakota Remix)

Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:01:16 +0000

[...] I Blame the Patriarchy (2006-03-06): Bill Napoli is a fucking perv. [...]

By: Marius’ Homesite » Blog Archive » How to make it into the dictionary

Sat, 13 May 2006 22:18:45 +0000

[...] Oh, Bill Napoli, how do women love you, let us count the ways: [...]

By: ladyfest romania » are women human?

ladyfest romania » are women human? — Sun, 07 May 2006 12:39:36 +0000

[...] – un senator in sua sa poata vorbi despre singura exceptie pe care o poate vedea el la noua lege in south dakota care interzice avortul chiar in cazuri de viol sau incest, in urmatorii termeni: “A real-life description [of an exception scenario] to me would be a rape victim, brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated. I mean, that girl could be so messed up, physically and psychologically, that carrying that child could very well threaten her life.” (pentru ca, altfel, majoritatea violurilor sint o nimica toata. mai ales daca victima nu e virgina/religioasa.) [...]

By: John Bryans Fontaine

John Bryans Fontaine — Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:42:52 +0000

Bill Napoli is a Theocratic Fascist. His goal is to destroy ALL freedom in the USA. He is a modern Hitler.

This is why I oppose Gay Marriage. The issue of Gay Marriage helps Theocratic Fascists like Bill Napoli by getting them votes. We cannot and will not give power to little Hitlers like Napoli(on). Civil Unions are good enough. Don’t allow Gay Marriage to destroy the Right to Choose.

By: Pseudo-Polymath » Blog Archive » Life, Conception, and all that

Pseudo-Polymath » Blog Archive » Life, Conception, and all that — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 02:58:11 +0000

[...] Mr Schraub also chooses to point out an example of a relatively extreme view, at the blog “I blame the Patriarchy”. It is an interesting, if representative, example of the extreme “feminist” frankly pro-abortion point of view. It is therefore interesting to contrast that post (and blog) with representatives/spokeswomen for the complementarian feminist point of view at girl-talk. The anonymous author of “I blame” is angry, foul mouthed, and mean spirited. The women at girl-talk … are never that. Who might persuade the outside unconvinced more? The comparison reminds me of my anti-ambassador post earlier. It appears Mr Meyers is not the only one. [...]

By: Men already have all the options in paternity

Men already have all the options in paternity — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:32:08 +0000

[...] Guess what, Mel?Â There already is a way for a man to have “some say over” unintended pregnancies, and it’s incredibly effective: he can abstain from sex.Â Keep his pants zipped.Â Be a good boy instead of a whore.Â And maybe once women start raping abstinent male virgins, forcing them to climax in all sorts of really demeaning ways, even Bill Napoli will grant you guys some sort of special reprieve on child support, even though he really doesn’t feel rape should be a factor in anyone’s reproductive rights. Don’t like it when the shoe’s on the other foot, do they? And yet it’s exactly what women have been told: want reproductive control?Â Keep your legs crossed, tramp.Â Jesus was a big fan of celibacy for men.Â If the US is determined to legislate a peculiar fundamentalist brand of pseudo-Christianity into our allegedly secular government, they can damn well follow all the Bible’s teachings instead of just the ones that make it acceptable for men to use women as sextoys, punching bags and baby machines.Â (And I’m confident genuine Christians will back me up on the fallacy of picking and choosing which bits of the Bible you feel like following.) Or here’s an even better thought: maybe we could just stick to the material and legislate according to what’s best for taxpayers and citizens.Â Which brings up another question: if these wicked fathers don’t pay for their own bastard offspring, who will?Â Why, I guess that would be me!Â At least in many cases.Â Assuming the US doesn’t manage to cut off what’s left of our social services completely. But it gets even worse.Â This wasn’t an issue of failed birth control.Â This was an issue of a scheming soap opera type vixen tricking him: He contends that the woman knew he didn’t want to have a child with her and assured him repeatedly that â€” because of a physical condition â€” she could not get pregnant. [...]

By: The Debate Link

The Debate Link — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 03:08:54 +0000

Life Begins At…?

I’m not a big abortion blogger. It seems most people view abortion in terms of black and white. It’s either akin to slaughtering babies, or it’s a key aspect of woman’s rights. And since the arguments seem to devolve into these simplistic terms rat…

By: Geekery Today

Geekery Today — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 06:48:54 +0000

Abortion on demand and without apology (Dakota Remix)

South Dakota raises the stakes Bill Napoli, member of the arbitrary Senate over the state of South Dakota, 3 March 2006: You know, I…

By: Kate

Kate — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:30:22 +0000

I went to the PBS site and downloaded the clip and listened. I stopped it when I could hear no more, afterall everyone has repeated it here. And my mouse is so much closer to the source than a remote would ever have been to my inclination in my old tv days.

That said, I can’t find any argument that better defines for anyone who cares to notice or consider the possibility, that abortion is about nothing more than punishing women for having sex. It is about hating women so completely that these haters wish them to suffer every humiliation and suffer it publically.

Also, my first thought was that this assbag made such an indifferent and detailed delivery of his imagined exemplary rape scenario, that I can’t help but wonder if he’s not a fan of online porn.

His mannerisms, his complete freedom of restraint or even the consideration of what his words imply about the lives of women, shows clearly to me that he probably views porn on a daily basis.

For the entire South Dakota Senate to completely ignore even the most rudimentary exclusions exemplifies how in reality the patriarchy shelters and feeds the rapist, pedophile, womanizer and batterer.

No one but either a drooling retard, or an apologizer for our fucked up mysoginistic culture disguised as a democracy would even assume that his comments signify anything less.

By: aldahlia

aldahlia — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:38:00 +0000

http://add.urbandictionary.com/verify.php?code=4b1f325b7e&function=submit

There’s an attempt at a Google Bomb in the works, too:
http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/index.php/weblog/bill_napoli_is_spelled_a_s_s_h_a_t/