<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Burns!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:41:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: parodigm at medusa smiles</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-16085</link>
		<dc:creator>parodigm at medusa smiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-16085</guid>
		<description>[...] Ok, I&#8217;ve already looked over the awful Britney Spears giving birth scupture thing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ok, I&#8217;ve already looked over the awful Britney Spears giving birth scupture thing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delphyne</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-16034</link>
		<dc:creator>Delphyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-16034</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, geez, lighten up. This is absolutely rib-cracking hilarious. I think the perfect home for such a sculpture would be that big-ass fundie church in Colorado. Right in front of the altar, or whatever passes for an altar (low prots donâ€™t have those, do they? I have no idea).

Quit retching and reflect for a moment on the stupid fundiesâ€™ embrace of this pornographic joke. That should quell the outrage right away! It did for me!&quot;

No, because I don&#039;t give a toss about the fundies, not in this case anyway.  What bothers me is that a woman&#039;s body is being used in this way.  Are we not supposed to give a shit becasue it&#039;s Britney Spears? We all hate *her*, right?  It&#039;s like being back at school, we laugh at the woman and the guy who used her gets a great big slap on the back.  What a hoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, geez, lighten up. This is absolutely rib-cracking hilarious. I think the perfect home for such a sculpture would be that big-ass fundie church in Colorado. Right in front of the altar, or whatever passes for an altar (low prots donâ€™t have those, do they? I have no idea).</p>
<p>Quit retching and reflect for a moment on the stupid fundiesâ€™ embrace of this pornographic joke. That should quell the outrage right away! It did for me!&#8221;</p>
<p>No, because I don&#8217;t give a toss about the fundies, not in this case anyway.  What bothers me is that a woman&#8217;s body is being used in this way.  Are we not supposed to give a shit becasue it&#8217;s Britney Spears? We all hate *her*, right?  It&#8217;s like being back at school, we laugh at the woman and the guy who used her gets a great big slap on the back.  What a hoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nyx</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-16002</link>
		<dc:creator>Nyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-16002</guid>
		<description>Thanks Twisty for this priceless post. Priceless in that each time I read it it retains its food spewing hilarity.

Just wondering-are pro-lifers really jumping on this porn for the cause?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Twisty for this priceless post. Priceless in that each time I read it it retains its food spewing hilarity.</p>
<p>Just wondering-are pro-lifers really jumping on this porn for the cause?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hkreader</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-15994</link>
		<dc:creator>hkreader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-15994</guid>
		<description>Sibyl wrote: &quot;Iâ€™m just trying to imagine the at-term woman whoâ€™d really be in the mood for sexâ€¦&quot;

(raising hand) - Me. Both my labors started that way. I know other women who swear by it as a way to either start or move along labor.  I thought it was from a combination of contractions from orgasm (however gotten to) and some hormone  in jism. Also nipple stimulation (self, midwife, or partner) can help w/ distracting from pain and keeping labor going.


When I first saw the picture (it was posted on bagnewsnotes), I thought it was a sculpture of some anonymous pregnant woman getting ready for sex from the back, or else woman swaying hips or doing the recommended &quot;cat arch&quot; for back labor (but with the rug???).

I did not have painless labors, I am a big fan of  &quot;gas and air&quot; (mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen), but some women I have met really *enjoy* laboring and birthing and even do so by themselves.

http://unassistedchildbirth.com/uc/catch.html

I don&#039;t like  the sculptor&#039;s political agenda, and he certainly did not get the position very accurately, and I *hate* the bearskin thing, but  besides that,  it&#039;s a nice change from depictions of women as suffering  the &quot;curse of Eve&quot;  in birth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sibyl wrote: &#8220;Iâ€™m just trying to imagine the at-term woman whoâ€™d really be in the mood for sexâ€¦&#8221;</p>
<p>(raising hand) &#8211; Me. Both my labors started that way. I know other women who swear by it as a way to either start or move along labor.  I thought it was from a combination of contractions from orgasm (however gotten to) and some hormone  in jism. Also nipple stimulation (self, midwife, or partner) can help w/ distracting from pain and keeping labor going.</p>
<p>When I first saw the picture (it was posted on bagnewsnotes), I thought it was a sculpture of some anonymous pregnant woman getting ready for sex from the back, or else woman swaying hips or doing the recommended &#8220;cat arch&#8221; for back labor (but with the rug???).</p>
<p>I did not have painless labors, I am a big fan of  &#8220;gas and air&#8221; (mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen), but some women I have met really *enjoy* laboring and birthing and even do so by themselves.</p>
<p><a href="http://unassistedchildbirth.com/uc/catch.html" rel="nofollow">http://unassistedchildbirth.com/uc/catch.html</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like  the sculptor&#8217;s political agenda, and he certainly did not get the position very accurately, and I *hate* the bearskin thing, but  besides that,  it&#8217;s a nice change from depictions of women as suffering  the &#8220;curse of Eve&#8221;  in birth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-15977</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-15977</guid>
		<description>Orgasms do cause uterine contractions in some women. Not all women by any means, and it&#039;s the minority of women who have vaginal orgasms, aka from &quot;rogering&quot; even in normal rogering circumstances. (All female orgasm originates in the clitoris).

And it&#039;s probably a minority of men who&#039;d survive long enough to get it up if they came near any woman in labour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orgasms do cause uterine contractions in some women. Not all women by any means, and it&#8217;s the minority of women who have vaginal orgasms, aka from &#8220;rogering&#8221; even in normal rogering circumstances. (All female orgasm originates in the clitoris).</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s probably a minority of men who&#8217;d survive long enough to get it up if they came near any woman in labour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Blood for Hubris</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-15976</link>
		<dc:creator>No Blood for Hubris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-15976</guid>
		<description>I confess.  I saw this last night, and thought, wow, what a concept, finding this funny statue and saying it&#039;s Brittney Spears Giving Birth.  I thought that Twisty sure brings snark to a new level.  haha.

Then I saw in the paper this morning that the statue really is of Brittney Spears Giving Birth and I am SO having problems with being part of the reality-based community.  I mean, really.  How can there be snark when reality is inherently so much snarkier.

I must suffocate myself in the nearest bearskin Brittney rug.  Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess.  I saw this last night, and thought, wow, what a concept, finding this funny statue and saying it&#8217;s Brittney Spears Giving Birth.  I thought that Twisty sure brings snark to a new level.  haha.</p>
<p>Then I saw in the paper this morning that the statue really is of Brittney Spears Giving Birth and I am SO having problems with being part of the reality-based community.  I mean, really.  How can there be snark when reality is inherently so much snarkier.</p>
<p>I must suffocate myself in the nearest bearskin Brittney rug.  Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sibyl</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-15975</link>
		<dc:creator>Sibyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-15975</guid>
		<description>A midwife I know pointed out that this position, though not ideal for birth, was perfect for coitally inducing labor.

Apparently a good hard rogering will start things right up if you&#039;re having a hard time getting into gear. There was some stuff about orgasms causing contractions and semen making the cervix dilate and what-not -- I&#039;m just trying to imagine the at-term woman who&#039;d really be in the mood for sex...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A midwife I know pointed out that this position, though not ideal for birth, was perfect for coitally inducing labor.</p>
<p>Apparently a good hard rogering will start things right up if you&#8217;re having a hard time getting into gear. There was some stuff about orgasms causing contractions and semen making the cervix dilate and what-not &#8212; I&#8217;m just trying to imagine the at-term woman who&#8217;d really be in the mood for sex&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-15967</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-15967</guid>
		<description>The corridor outside Bill Napoli&#039;s office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The corridor outside Bill Napoli&#8217;s office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KB</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-15960</link>
		<dc:creator>KB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-15960</guid>
		<description>Oh, geez, lighten up.  This is absolutely rib-cracking hilarious.  I think the perfect home for such a sculpture would be that big-ass fundie church in Colorado.  Right in front of the altar, or whatever passes for an altar (low prots don&#039;t have those, do they?  I have no idea).

Quit retching and reflect for a moment on the stupid fundies&#039; embrace of this pornographic joke.  That should quell the outrage right away!  It did for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, geez, lighten up.  This is absolutely rib-cracking hilarious.  I think the perfect home for such a sculpture would be that big-ass fundie church in Colorado.  Right in front of the altar, or whatever passes for an altar (low prots don&#8217;t have those, do they?  I have no idea).</p>
<p>Quit retching and reflect for a moment on the stupid fundies&#8217; embrace of this pornographic joke.  That should quell the outrage right away!  It did for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delphyne</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/03/29/it-burns/#comment-15959</link>
		<dc:creator>Delphyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=546#comment-15959</guid>
		<description>&quot;I personally find this sculpture hilarious, but I donâ€™t think everyone else is familiar with Danâ€™s â€œSelf-Portrait Variationâ€ and the Ted Williams pieces. The guyâ€™s a hoot.&quot;

The guy&#039;s a prick.

Let&#039;s see a picture of him naked on a bearskin rug with his bottom facing skywards.  Then I might have a good laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I personally find this sculpture hilarious, but I donâ€™t think everyone else is familiar with Danâ€™s â€œSelf-Portrait Variationâ€ and the Ted Williams pieces. The guyâ€™s a hoot.&#8221;</p>
<p>The guy&#8217;s a prick.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see a picture of him naked on a bearskin rug with his bottom facing skywards.  Then I might have a good laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
