Comments on: Can A Liberal White Dude Be A Feminist?

By: OWS Women have Heard Enough from Loudmouth Dudes « Ice Cream Headache

OWS Women have Heard Enough from Loudmouth Dudes « Ice Cream Headache — Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:26:08 +0000

[...] reckon there are actual male feminists (sympathizers might be a better word) in the liberal/progressive and libertarian camps, just as there are white folks who are cognizant [...]

By: Class Solidarity and the Universality of Artistic Gesture - The Pursuit of Harpyness

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:01:52 +0000

[...] And it seems to me that my role as an outsider is to listen and understand, but not to usurp. Twisty once said something in this vein: There are inner circles of class solidarity into which an outside “sympathizer” simply cannot [...]

By: Men can’t be feminists « The Bleeding Heart Show

Men can’t be feminists « The Bleeding Heart Show — Thu, 01 May 2008 20:30:26 +0000

[...] the same artist (yes, the words on this blog will be considered as art) has described, even the most well-meaning male ‘feminists’ can be laughably, cringe-worthily bad at [...]

By: FAQ: Can men be feminists? « Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog

FAQ: Can men be feminists? « Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:34:01 +0000

[...] Twisty Faster (I Blame The Patriarchy): Can A Liberal White Dude Be A Feminist? [...]

By: Candace

Candace — Fri, 25 May 2007 00:38:12 +0000

Can a man be feminist? I can argue that either way depending on my general mood at the time. I am much more interested in how people act than on the label we give them that day.

By: cypress

cypress — Mon, 01 May 2006 06:41:28 +0000

Chris – #125. brilliant. but i nearly blew my nose off with the snort. brilliant. and what a handy link that could prove to be!

By: Dude Week: The Gripping Series Finale at I Blame The Patriarchy

Dude Week: The Gripping Series Finale at I Blame The Patriarchy — Sun, 30 Apr 2006 18:22:53 +0000

[...] [Just joining us? The plot so far: In series of increasingly asinine comments on recent post, 20-something porn-loving white dude claims feminist cred. Smackdown ensues. White dude issues apology here; readers divided on whether to forgive and forget. Meanwhile, author posits that, re: male involvement in women’s liberation from male oppression, dudes can support cause all they like as long as they stay fuck out of way.] [...]

By: R. Mildred

R. Mildred — Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:21:43 +0000

Rape is the only patriarchally approved form of sex, and as such it causes heterosexual sexual relations within patriarchy to always be some kind of power play, and as Men are automatically the dominators in the mind of the patriarchal man's head, then it holds true that a threesome with two women is a situation where they are dominating more than one woman. The fact that the sex will, by it's very nature, be really really lame is besides the point because sex under patriarchy is never actually about sexual satisfaction so much as it is about power and the reaffirmations of heirachies in which women are subservient to men. And no that doesn't mean that all heterosexual sex under patriarhcy is rape, but merely that, under patriarchy, rape is merely heterosexual sex taken to its logical extreme. Or to summarize: I blame the patriarchy for John Norman.

By: Pony

Pony — Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:23:59 +0000

I know I shouldn’t say this. I’m going to be sorry I said this: but why do these dorks always think two women and them?

Which other guy did you have in mind?

By: R. Mildred

R. Mildred — Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:01:07 +0000

The sad thing is you’d need two blamecons, the fake one you send the MFs to who’ll dirty the place up with their constant urge to ask all the feminists they meet whether they’ll go for a threesome, and the real one all the feminists will actually go to.