Monthly Archive for May, 2006

Lean Cuisine

Chick food
If only I were a caption-blogger.

You know those beer commercials that appeal to hairy-knuckled 18-to-34-year-old morons with the jolly idea that guys own whatever they penetrate? This Flux dude believes that I (along with fellow-blamer Hedonistic) “overreacted” to these “fairly innocent and clever” ads when I posted a couple of paragraphs about them a few weeks ago. Apparently my having satirized Boo-Yah Nation with a bunch of totally made-up shit about an obscure French historical figure with a finger stuck in a beer bottle amounts to an egregiously wasteful intellectual expenditure.

(Words cannot express the gratitude that washes over me when male persons express concern for the potential depletion of my mental reserves whenever I cast uncalled-for aspersions on “minor foolishness” like misogyny. Indeed, after having completed the arduous yet ultimately silly task of composing the aforementioned 150-word inflammatory lampoon, I had to lie down and stare blankly at the ceiling for two hours. Next time I’ll try to remember to laugh along with the funny sexist comedy-joke instead of getting so riled up I resort to inventing French history just for the hell of it. Think of the brainpower I’ll save! Maybe I can use it to clean toilets.)

Flux further speculates that I am “out of [my] mind,” intimates that because he has seen beer commercials that were even more sexist I shouldn’t be writing about this one, and declares that it is precisely my sort of irrational crap that gives the Rush Limbaughs of the world “grist for their ‘feminazi’ mills.”

Rather than risk further diminution of my loony Rush-baiting girl-brain, I’ll refrain from making fun of that tired old metaphor.

I hate to imagine what old Flux, regulator of female thought processes that he is, would say about the following hilarious excerpt from an indictment of the misogyno-homophobic Man-Eat-Meat Burger King commercials vs. patriarchy-approved Lean Cuisine ads. Nothing, probably, since it was written by a guy.

Contrary to Burger King’s celebration of men being revered for shoveling food into their mouths, Lean Cuisine molds women as such: a group of woman brag to each other about how shitty their dinner was last night.

“Last night I had a half bag of microwave popcorn.”

“I ate three leaves of lettuce.”

“I just ate right out of the cat’s litter box.”

But lo- the uppity one deigns to speak- “I had a delicious meal that actually tasted good.”

Astonished, she must then pacify her friends, ready to eviscerate her for her audacity. “Relax, girls! It was just a Lean Cuisine! A shitty frozen microwave dinner. I mean, Jesus, you don’t think I’d actually enjoy eating, would you?”

And then they all giggle and discuss the latest corset styles and what it would be like if they had the right to vote.

Today’s whole post, actually, was just an excuse to crib this bit.

[Gracias, Esme]

Nebraska Judge Lacks Clue Re: Mini-Perv

Mini-perv
Popular cartoon character Ned Flanders is transubstantiated into evil Munchkin

Prisons appear to function chiefly either as rugs under which honkys enjoy sweeping the displeasing detritus of patriarchy’s failure, or as iconic repositories of polite society’s magnificent vengeance. Still, there are moments when even I must admit that the notion of a hitch in the hoosegow is not without its appeal as a fitting fate for certain choice deviants. Those Enron dudes spring to mind. The odd Nazi, religious zealot, or American president who cannot control his addiction to mass murder. Rapists. The chucklehead at the end of my street with the atomic leaf-blower at 7 am on Sunday morning.

And of course, the above-pictured charmer, a convicted child molester.

You’d think, given the fantastic mandatory sentences handed down for stupid crap like drug possession, that a conviction in a case of sexual assault on a little kid would naturally incur a bid in the bastille. The idea of imprisonment, when scrutinized by persons with an aversion to child rape, presents few flaws. But the pokey was not to be for this dude. In fact, although anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see at a glance that the guy is a total perv, he was given probation instead.

Why? He’s 5′1″.

Here’s how it happened: Cocking her head, the judge, gavel in the air, thought she heard something. A sound, a dulcet vibration, a gentle murmur floating on a placid breeze from the penitentiary. Was it?—yes! Yes, it was! The refrain wafted from the throats of a thousand felons gathered for their weekly singalong. It went: “Don’t want no short people/ Don’t want no short people/Don’t want no short people/Round here.”

“I truly hope,” said the judge (who has a gambling problem) to the mini-perv (whose problem needs no introduction), “that my bet on you being OK out in society is not misplaced.”

Marines.

Motivated by a Majikthise post to get my giant brain off its Saturday movie-channel-watching keister and read in the Washington Post about the war—man, I hate reading about the war more than anything—I was sickened in the extreme by an article on what Lindsay is calling Iraq’s My Lai. The piece relates locals’ accounts of the massacre in cold blood of two dozen Iraqi civilians by US Marines last November. Seems a few of our boys sought vengeance with a door-to-door shooting spree in the town of Haditha after a roadside bomb killed one of their buds. Three families and a taxi-full of college students were murdered. Naturally a coverup ensued.

(The WaPo helpfully points out, as an aid to readers are slow to grasp the horrific extent of the pathos, perhaps because they are too distracted by the porn in the Victoria’s Secret sidebar ad, that the murdered civilians included women-and-children.)

Senseless massacres and their subsequent coverups are the ultimate and inexorable consequence of a social order founded on dominance. What other outcome could you possibly expect, when you take a bunch of uneducated teenage boys, tell them God is an American, women are fuckholes, and brown people are dirt, give them guns, and send them off to shoot people merely to gratify the vanity of imperialist godbag corporate hooligans?

The US military reportedly paid survivors between $1500 and $2500 for each dead family member. Go USA!

Germans.

Grup Tekkan

4,426,937—no, 4,426,938—people have watched this, spawning, of course, this.

[via David's World, Yeahpope ]

Rhythm Method: Now Just As Painful To Jesus As The Pill

Shrimp enchiladas
Shrimp enchiladas at El Chile in East Austin have nothing to do with, and have the advantage of tasting a lot better than, contraception.

How about this hilarious headline: “‘Rhythm Method’ May Kill Off More Embryos Than Other Methods of Contraception”? The corresponding post in Scienceblog quotes a dude identified only as Professor Bovens, who claims that the rhythm method, lovingly embraced by the Catholic church as the only Jesus-approved form of birth control, probably snuffs out way more embryos than the Pill.

Quoth the Professor, “[The rhythm method] may owe much of its success to the fact that embryos conceived on the fringes of the fertile period are less viable than those conceived towards the middle.”

In other words, the rhythm method produces those darling, beloved embryos, all righty, and then, anti-American biological forces being what they are, kills’em as dead as a Pole eating ice cream during a papal visit. Condom use, on the other hand, kills a mere fraction of the millions of clumps of genetic material dispatched every year by these other, more “callous” forms of birth control. If this is true, well, nyah-nyah, Mr. Stupid Pope!

Thus, the mysterious Professor intimates that pro-lifers and other uterus police forces should be just as “nervous” about the rhythm method as they are about all the other ways sane people have devised in order that women may be freed from the shackles of compulsory pregnancy.

[Gracias, Trisha and Aimee]

Urgent Blamer Intervention Request, No. 2

From Jessica at Feministing:

Hey all,

Samhita wrote a post today on the Duke case and she’s getting slammed in comments by some pretty nasty people. I’m going to comment, but I’m in the middle of moving so it’s not going to be long. Samhita has been pretty discouraged lately with disparaging comments and the general racist, sexist bullshit that’s been thrown specifically at her. I already had to ban commenters calling her stupid, etc. It sucks and it’s ridiculous. It would mean a lot if you could show your solidarity in comments (assuming you’re comfortable with that). I’m just emailing the few folks adresses I have on my blackberry, so feel free to fwd on. Thanks so much.

Jessica

The post is here.

Some Guy Has a Blog

According to his press release, Norbizness is hosting The Dean Martin Mildly Popular Caption-Blogger Roast to celebrate his third anniversary as a mildly popular caption-blogger.

“Nor-who?” I asked Phil, my secretary.

After Phil explained that Norbizness is “you know, that guy who can’t stop using the word ‘pwn3d!!’,” I sent him some hookers and blow to mark the occasion.

Urgent Blamer Intervention Request

Blamer Eileen has dispatched to Twisty HQ an impassioned communiqué appealing for aid in combating the sexist subtext of a fuckardly editorial infesting her local paper. Quoth Eileen:

Dear Twisty,

I am in desperate need of some patriarchy-blaming help. I love your site, and was hoping that you and/or your kind readers might help me craft a response to an editorial published in my local paper. This editorial (the kind written by the editors, not the guest kind) is about a (theoretical) gender gap in higher education.

Here’s a choice bit from the middle:

“When there are markedly more educated women than men, marriage rates and birth rates are distorted.

Don’t believe us? In highly educated Germany, nearly 40 percent of educated women have never had children. As a result, this country has one of the lowest birth rates in the world and an aging native-born population.

The cause behind it seems to be this: highly educated, professional women are having trouble finding male equals as partners. When that’s added to the fact that these same women have many more professional and personal choices than their mothers and grandmothers used to, many are simply electing not to get married or have children.”

The rest is here.

Now, I always get an oogy-gut feeling when I see headlines like “Our New Gender Gap”. But this time I moved straight into sputtering mode. All I could come up with was “Dear editors, WOMEN ARE NOT BABY MACHINES.”

I would like to send them something a little more coherent. They print pretty much every letter they get (I guess that goes in the ‘pro’ column for small-town life), so you can see why I’m hoping for the help of the larger patriarchy-blaming community.

Thanks bunches, Eileen

I ask you, who among us has not experienced the oogy-gut feeling when presented with the icy glare of patriarchy? So help a sister out, girls. Save Eileen from despair.

Poland Terrified Pope Will Find Out About Menstruation

Every morning the Twisty inbox is pretty well chockablock with news of the asinine, yet every morning there is at least one item so absurd, so irrational, so completely cracked, that when I read it the little shred of hope for humankind that sometimes manages to soothe my inflamed obstreperal lobe during the night instantly executes a clumsy swan dive off the deep end.

Which is exactly what happened when I read that, in preparation for a visit from the world’s premier pointy-hatted old homophobic misogynist, Poland has suddenly developed a passion for protecting the citizenry from the life-threatening hazards of ice cream. They will be banning sales of the dessert for the duration, citing “a danger to health.”

It seems that, in Poland, ice cream performs the bidding of Death’s Bright Angel by “go[ing] off.” Left to the imagination is the exact manner in which a frozen dessert is more susceptible to bacterial incursions than, say, a kielbasa.

And apparently nobody cares if ice cream kills people when the pope isn’t in town (nor does there appear to be any bureaucratic concern for what I would consider the more terrifying threat: that the pope might preach them to death).

But wait! There’s more! They’re also banning booze (although the pope himself will retain access to wine, praise Jesus), as well as TV ads for birth control, women’s underwear, and—you guessed it—tampons. Possibly the Poles fear the cosmic implosion that would theoretically take place if His Holiness and little wads of absorbent cotton (also known as ‘godbag anti-matter’) were to occupy the same point on the space-time continuum.

[Gracias, Anne]

The Torrid Tale of Ard

My apologies to all who have been offended by the –tard suffix. Let it be known I personally attach no significance to the matrimonial status of anyone’s parents.

As it happens, the great fucktard/bastard/retard debate, tedious though it has been, has prompted a reexamination of the etymology of the word ‘bastard’ here at the Twisty Institute for Neologistic Research. As a result, I am happy to announce that I, ignorant chump that I am, have been getting it wrong all along. No, it’s true! It turns out that –tard is not quite the suffix I thought it was; –ard, in fact, is the appendage for which the word ‘fuck’ has been calling out lo these many years. If only I had listened to its anguished cries! For had I bothered to give it five minutes’ thought, it would have dawned on me that it makes far more sense without the ‘T’. But you show me the spinster aunt who has five minutes to spare for thought, and I’ll show you a spinster aunt with a staff of twelve fawning minions and a red-lining IQ.

Anyway, the story of –ard began life, as has so much eurotrash, in Germany, where it was known as –hart, meaning ‘hardy,’ and formed the ending of dudely personal names (à la ‘Reinhart’). As sands passed through the hourglass, our restless protagonist wandered across borders hither and yon, acquiring a pejorative sense along the way (perhaps an homage to the winning personalities of those German dudes). One fine spring day it landed in France, where it metamorphosed into –ard, and was reborn as a handy way to diss and derogate pretty much anything: couard, canard, vieillard, etc. When it crossed the channel it retained this depreciatory quality, and came to be pretty exclusively deployed as a formative indicating “one who does to excess, or who does what is discreditable.”

As in ‘drunkard’ or ’sluggard,’ names to which spinster aunts have been known to answer.

As for ‘bastard,’ the epithet’s root derives from the Latin bastum, a sort of pack-saddle used as a bed by ancient travelers. Hence, fils de bast, or pack-saddle-baby.

Note that though ‘bastard’ and ‘retard’ share four letters, their etymology is different. ‘Retard’, from a French word meaning ‘delay’, does not appear to have sprung from the loins of the aforementioned suffix. It hails from the Latin tardus, meaning ’slow.’ As a term of derision ‘retard’ has existed for fewer than 40 years, mostly in the US.

In conclusion, the word ‘fucktard’, for patriarchy-blaming purposes, is hereby formally expunged, and will in future appear as the more accurate, if markedly geekier, ‘fuckard’, which should soothe the prickled nerve-endings of unwed mother and exceptional citizen alike.

[I cribbed considerably from the indispensable OED for this post]