Comments on: White Male Privilege In a Nutbag. I Mean Nutshell. http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/ Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:00:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Human Rights http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-121856 Human Rights Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:08:27 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-121856 White Male Privilege is a good book in the fight against dicrimination. White Male Privilege is a good book in the fight against dicrimination.

]]> By: hedonistic http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24346 hedonistic Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:29:58 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24346 I want a disemvoweler, wah. I want a disemvoweler, wah.

]]> By: Pony http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24319 Pony Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:20:52 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24319 jack nicholson with lockjaw jack nicholson with lockjaw

]]> By: Twisty http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24316 Twisty Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:10:08 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24316 I am trying out my new Disemvoweler plugin on LOLBall. Looks like it's workin. I am trying out my new Disemvoweler plugin on LOLBall. Looks like it’s workin.

]]> By: LOLBall666 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24262 LOLBall666 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:30:09 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24262 "Your thesis, dear TrollBall, seemed to be that Bush couldn’t possibly be groping Merkel due to her “unattractiveness.” " I'm not saying it's impossible - I'm just suprised no one here even considered the possiblity. You can't even bear to discuss her unattractiveness without putting it in quotes. "My point was that sexual aggression, including groping and rape, has nothing to do with the “attractiveness” of the victim. Instead, it is all about the aggressor’s desire to harm, control, demean, and oppress. That’s your last piece of kibble from me. Go Cheney yourself, troll." I've heard that motivation claimed for rape, with actual evidence back it up - though never for groping. “Your thesis, dear TrollBall, seemed to be that Bush couldn’t possibly be groping Merkel due to her “unattractiveness.” ”

I’m not saying it’s impossible - I’m just suprised no one here even considered the possiblity. You can’t even bear to discuss her unattractiveness without putting it in quotes.

“My point was that sexual aggression, including groping and rape, has nothing to do with the “attractiveness” of the victim. Instead, it is all about the aggressor’s desire to harm, control, demean, and oppress.

That’s your last piece of kibble from me. Go Cheney yourself, troll.”

I’ve heard that motivation claimed for rape, with actual evidence back it up - though never for groping.

]]> By: rumblelizard http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24253 rumblelizard Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:00:46 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24253 Your thesis, dear TrollBall, seemed to be that Bush couldn't possibly be groping Merkel due to her "unattractiveness." My point was that sexual aggression, including groping and rape, has nothing to do with the "attractiveness" of the victim. Instead, it is all about the aggressor's desire to harm, control, demean, and oppress. That's your last piece of kibble from me. Go Cheney yourself, troll. Your thesis, dear TrollBall, seemed to be that Bush couldn’t possibly be groping Merkel due to her “unattractiveness.” My point was that sexual aggression, including groping and rape, has nothing to do with the “attractiveness” of the victim. Instead, it is all about the aggressor’s desire to harm, control, demean, and oppress.

That’s your last piece of kibble from me. Go Cheney yourself, troll.

]]> By: LOLBall666 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24249 LOLBall666 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:16:37 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24249 "Ah, yes. Because females who are not generally considered sexually attractive, such as children and the very elderly, are never sexually assaulted. Good point!" They do. By people with an extreme sexual deviance. Does Mr. Bush stand on that end of the sexual perversion spectrum? Despite all his other faults - I'm inclined to say no. “Ah, yes. Because females who are not generally considered sexually attractive, such as

children and the very elderly, are never sexually assaulted. Good point!”

They do. By people with an extreme sexual deviance. Does Mr. Bush stand on that end

of the sexual perversion spectrum?

Despite all his other faults - I’m inclined to say no.

]]> By: rumblelizard http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24219 rumblelizard Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:18:30 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24219 Ah, yes. Because females who are not generally considered sexually attractive, such as children and the very elderly, are never sexually assaulted. Good point! Ah, yes. Because females who are not generally considered sexually attractive, such as children and the very elderly, are never sexually assaulted. Good point!

]]> By: Mar Iguana http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24201 Mar Iguana Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:38:09 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24201 "Better than having boring run-of-the-mill-balls." Fact. “Better than having boring run-of-the-mill-balls.”

Fact.

]]> By: LOLBall666 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24186 LOLBall666 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:59:32 +0000 http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/07/20/white-male-privilege-in-a-nutbag-i-mean-nutshell/#comment-24186 [quote]LOLBall doesn’t understand that it’s not about the sex. [/quote] WHOA. Fondling [i]isn't[/i] about sexual attraction afterall. LOL were you born retarded or did you have to work at it? [quote] She’s smart, which is a huge threat and a provocation to GWB[/quote] Considering the alcohol-addled state of GWB's brain, [i]most [/i]people probably provoke him in that department o.o [quote]Ignorant and Proud, the slogan of the “I can be a stupid as I wanna be” crowd and their cretin leader, bushboy, Hero of the Stupid, who can’t imagine a world void of dominance and submission. As with any good Roman, they see humans as either pokers or pokees. Holes is holes. Kinky.[/quote] lol. As a matter of fact the world [i]hasn't been[/i] "void of dominance or submission" since the first carnivores got here =/ HAIL VEGETARIANISM!!! :D 666!!! [quote]LOLBall666? Heh, yes, that handle, so to speak, does paint a funny picture. Walking around with 666 balls would give a boy one hilarious gait. Might want to consider consultation with a reputable exorcist for help with that unfortunate condition.[/quote] I don't see what's so unfortunate. Better than having boring run-of-the-mill-balls. Or testicular cancer. Or something. The gait gets stares from women. Half disturbed fascination. Half undiluted animal lust. Just this morning 300 playboy bunnies with mattresses over their heads tried to kick down my apartment door. I'm not one to be taken advantage of. I ran for my life and dove out the window landing on a taxi driver and killing him instantly. I drove home and got away by the skin of my Satan Balls - then chugged three bottles of Gatorade. Fact. [quote]LOLBall doesn’t understand that it’s not about the sex. [/quote]

WHOA. Fondling [i]isn’t[/i] about sexual attraction afterall.
LOL were you born retarded or did you have to work at it?

[quote]
She’s smart, which is a huge threat and a provocation to GWB[/quote]

Considering the alcohol-addled state of GWB’s brain, [i]most [/i]people probably provoke him in that department o.o

[quote]Ignorant and Proud, the slogan of the “I can be a stupid as I wanna be” crowd and their cretin leader, bushboy, Hero of the Stupid, who can’t imagine a world void of dominance and submission. As with any good Roman, they see humans as either pokers or pokees. Holes is holes. Kinky.[/quote]

lol. As a matter of fact the world [i]hasn’t been[/i] “void of dominance or submission” since the first carnivores got here =/ HAIL VEGETARIANISM!!! :D 666!!!

[quote]LOLBall666? Heh, yes, that handle, so to speak, does paint a funny picture. Walking around with 666 balls would give a boy one hilarious gait. Might want to consider consultation with a reputable exorcist for help with that unfortunate condition.[/quote]

I don’t see what’s so unfortunate. Better than having boring run-of-the-mill-balls. Or testicular cancer. Or something.

The gait gets stares from women. Half disturbed fascination. Half undiluted animal lust.
Just this morning 300 playboy bunnies with mattresses over their heads tried to kick down my apartment door.
I’m not one to be taken advantage of.
I ran for my life and dove out the window landing on a taxi driver and killing him instantly.
I drove home and got away by the skin of my Satan Balls - then chugged three bottles of Gatorade.

Fact.

]]>