<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Patriarchy Check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: home wet bar</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-56248</link>
		<dc:creator>home wet bar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-56248</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;home wet bar...&lt;/strong&gt;

--&gt;home wet bar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>home wet bar&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8211;&gt;home wet bar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feminish &#187; Masculine pronouns and me</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-27410</link>
		<dc:creator>feminish &#187; Masculine pronouns and me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-27410</guid>
		<description>[...] I then played this game with the whole of the web - a bit of a one-dimensional quantative version of Twisty&#8217;s Friday Patriarchy Check googling &#8220;women&#8221;: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I then played this game with the whole of the web &#8211; a bit of a one-dimensional quantative version of Twisty&#8217;s Friday Patriarchy Check googling &#8220;women&#8221;: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#171; oh, internets!</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26348</link>
		<dc:creator>&#171; oh, internets!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26348</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday Patriarchy Checka little window from Google to the world [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday Patriarchy Checka little window from Google to the world [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26115</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26115</guid>
		<description>Rosalind Franklin: better


http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-3/p42.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosalind Franklin: better</p>
<p><a href="http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-3/p42.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-3/p42.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26113</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26113</guid>
		<description>Oh you do have to read the wiki bio on Rosalind Franklin. Apparently, King&#039;s College was not sexist. NuhUh. Although there was a men&#039;s only dining room, most of the patriarchy would not dine there and instead preferred the mixed gender dining room. Why cause the men&#039;s dining room was overwhelmed by theologians. Women 1 Theologians 0.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh you do have to read the wiki bio on Rosalind Franklin. Apparently, King&#8217;s College was not sexist. NuhUh. Although there was a men&#8217;s only dining room, most of the patriarchy would not dine there and instead preferred the mixed gender dining room. Why cause the men&#8217;s dining room was overwhelmed by theologians. Women 1 Theologians 0.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklin" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bendy Quicker</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26109</link>
		<dc:creator>Bendy Quicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26109</guid>
		<description>The other day on I Love Lucy: Ricky spanks Lucy.

Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day on I Love Lucy: Ricky spanks Lucy.</p>
<p>Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26108</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26108</guid>
		<description>I just received a message from the patriarchy:


&quot;Not even close. She did do the best X-ray crystalography on it, up to that time. She did not work and play well with others, and looked, sounded, and had a personality very much like Ayn Rand. Watson detested her, but stole her data when she refused all collaboration with anybody. That data was only one small part of the puzzle, and Watson made a leap with it which Franklin would never have been able to make, even if she knew all the other stuff, which she didn&#039;t.
 
Possibly she would have shared a Nobel in chem if she hadn&#039;t died early. Read the Wiki for DNA (history part) and for Franklin herself, which is sympathetic. And for Heavensake read the Double Helix--- one of the greatest and most honest books about doing science ever written.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just received a message from the patriarchy:</p>
<p>&#8220;Not even close. She did do the best X-ray crystalography on it, up to that time. She did not work and play well with others, and looked, sounded, and had a personality very much like Ayn Rand. Watson detested her, but stole her data when she refused all collaboration with anybody. That data was only one small part of the puzzle, and Watson made a leap with it which Franklin would never have been able to make, even if she knew all the other stuff, which she didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Possibly she would have shared a Nobel in chem if she hadn&#8217;t died early. Read the Wiki for DNA (history part) and for Franklin herself, which is sympathetic. And for Heavensake read the Double Helix&#8212; one of the greatest and most honest books about doing science ever written.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luckynkl</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26105</link>
		<dc:creator>Luckynkl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26105</guid>
		<description>The blatant sexism and the attacks on her sex is nauseating, no?  These boys don&#039;t even have enough sense to be embarrassed by it.  So I&#039;ll be embarrassed for them and their arrogant sense of entitlement to male superiority.  If that&#039;s what they were hoping to accomplish, they only succeeded in doing the opposite.  Oh, I&#039;m so embarrassed for them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blatant sexism and the attacks on her sex is nauseating, no?  These boys don&#8217;t even have enough sense to be embarrassed by it.  So I&#8217;ll be embarrassed for them and their arrogant sense of entitlement to male superiority.  If that&#8217;s what they were hoping to accomplish, they only succeeded in doing the opposite.  Oh, I&#8217;m so embarrassed for them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26100</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26100</guid>
		<description>I just found her website, and a good example of what you&#039;re saying re men just can&#039;t believe it! All the great MALE mathematical minds lining up to hoo haw over her wrong. But she wasn&#039;t. 

http://www.marilynvossavant.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64?f=1&amp;sid=380cd019112c5f2d2ef9f2f7b7a60098</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found her website, and a good example of what you&#8217;re saying re men just can&#8217;t believe it! All the great MALE mathematical minds lining up to hoo haw over her wrong. But she wasn&#8217;t. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.marilynvossavant.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64?f=1&amp;sid=380cd019112c5f2d2ef9f2f7b7a60098" rel="nofollow">http://www.marilynvossavant.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=64?f=1&amp;sid=380cd019112c5f2d2ef9f2f7b7a60098</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luckynkl</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26089</link>
		<dc:creator>Luckynkl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/09/08/friday-patriarchy-check/#comment-26089</guid>
		<description>I guess Mileva and Albert were divorced?  I heard mention it was in the divorce papers.  Apparently she had to keep her mouth shut and he had to pay her hush money.

I&#039;ve also heard mention from a few people now that Albert was a very abusive husband. So a picture is emerging of a man that beat his wife and stold her work.  Some hero.

But notice how Einstein&#039;s IQ and work was just accepted and not questioned?  Compare that to how Marilyn vos Savant is treated.  Marilyn has the highest IQ ever recorded in history.  And the boys just won&#039;t stand for it.  They spend countless hours trying to discredit her.  &quot;It just can&#039;t be!&quot; the boys cry.  It is, after all, men&#039;s divine right to lord over women.  God says so!

Little wonder women have been denied education over the millenia.  If you can&#039;t beat &#039;em, just eliminate them from the competition!  What a splendid way to shore up male superiority!  If women can&#039;t read and write, they can&#039;t compete and they can&#039;t record history!  Throw into the fray that women couldn&#039;t inherit or own property (which would include patents), couldn&#039;t keep their wages (it went to the nearest male relative), own a bank account, let alone vote and voila!  Instant male superiority!  Just add water and stir.

Of course, in recent relative history, these bans have been lifted on many women globally (tho many still remain under the ban).  I guess the boys were confident that they had all their ducks in a row and had done enough to keep women out of the competition.  But more than likely, they started believing their own lies.  Despite milleniums of oppression, double standards and sexism, women not only caught up to men academically, but surpassed them in just a few short decades. Porn, sex work, rape and violence against women rise in direct proportion to women&#039;s gains and progress.  And so does war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Mileva and Albert were divorced?  I heard mention it was in the divorce papers.  Apparently she had to keep her mouth shut and he had to pay her hush money.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also heard mention from a few people now that Albert was a very abusive husband. So a picture is emerging of a man that beat his wife and stold her work.  Some hero.</p>
<p>But notice how Einstein&#8217;s IQ and work was just accepted and not questioned?  Compare that to how Marilyn vos Savant is treated.  Marilyn has the highest IQ ever recorded in history.  And the boys just won&#8217;t stand for it.  They spend countless hours trying to discredit her.  &#8220;It just can&#8217;t be!&#8221; the boys cry.  It is, after all, men&#8217;s divine right to lord over women.  God says so!</p>
<p>Little wonder women have been denied education over the millenia.  If you can&#8217;t beat &#8216;em, just eliminate them from the competition!  What a splendid way to shore up male superiority!  If women can&#8217;t read and write, they can&#8217;t compete and they can&#8217;t record history!  Throw into the fray that women couldn&#8217;t inherit or own property (which would include patents), couldn&#8217;t keep their wages (it went to the nearest male relative), own a bank account, let alone vote and voila!  Instant male superiority!  Just add water and stir.</p>
<p>Of course, in recent relative history, these bans have been lifted on many women globally (tho many still remain under the ban).  I guess the boys were confident that they had all their ducks in a row and had done enough to keep women out of the competition.  But more than likely, they started believing their own lies.  Despite milleniums of oppression, double standards and sexism, women not only caught up to men academically, but surpassed them in just a few short decades. Porn, sex work, rape and violence against women rise in direct proportion to women&#8217;s gains and progress.  And so does war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

