<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parents of today: sex up those babies!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Delishka</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-38117</link>
		<dc:creator>Delishka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-38117</guid>
		<description>the baboon, I appreciate your comments on the validity of in vivo birth, the reproductive power that women hold, and the biological imperative that drives beings, females especially in our own species, but in the end all beings, to further the reproduction of their own kind to the possible detriment of their personal interests.

As for baby clothes, I am currently expecting.  This week, finally, the gender of my baby was revealed.  Practically the instant we knew it was a girl, I was out shopping with my mother.  I already had a (very) small supply of yellow and white bodysuits.  We didn&#039;t go crazy, but I went ahead and got the violet wunsies I&#039;d been lusting after, and the little green with pink flowers and the ruffly butt.

In every store I did my pre-buying informative shop, the selection of clothes in infants that was aimed towards little girls exclusively was larger than the section aimed towards boys...and the supposedly gender neutral colors were also leaning towards the cutesy feminine side.  There were more pink bibs and socks and what have you to choose from, than there was of any other two colors combined.

Indoctrinating little girls into a fashion aquisition state of mind seems to start at size 3-6 month.

Of course, as I just admitted, my mother and I were already perpetrating that feminine stereotype by shopping while the men sat and had donuts...Also, in an earlier pregnancy, when I was carrying a son, I bought very little in the way of clothing, and only one item in any color other than yellow, green or white, and that one because my husband picked out the blue with tools and &#039;daddy&#039;s litle helper&#039;.  When I was having a boy, I was preoccupied with trying to keep everything &#039;gender neutral&#039; but as soon as there was a girl on the way, the rules changed to anything goes.

Dunno what that says about me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the baboon, I appreciate your comments on the validity of in vivo birth, the reproductive power that women hold, and the biological imperative that drives beings, females especially in our own species, but in the end all beings, to further the reproduction of their own kind to the possible detriment of their personal interests.</p>
<p>As for baby clothes, I am currently expecting.  This week, finally, the gender of my baby was revealed.  Practically the instant we knew it was a girl, I was out shopping with my mother.  I already had a (very) small supply of yellow and white bodysuits.  We didn&#8217;t go crazy, but I went ahead and got the violet wunsies I&#8217;d been lusting after, and the little green with pink flowers and the ruffly butt.</p>
<p>In every store I did my pre-buying informative shop, the selection of clothes in infants that was aimed towards little girls exclusively was larger than the section aimed towards boys&#8230;and the supposedly gender neutral colors were also leaning towards the cutesy feminine side.  There were more pink bibs and socks and what have you to choose from, than there was of any other two colors combined.</p>
<p>Indoctrinating little girls into a fashion aquisition state of mind seems to start at size 3-6 month.</p>
<p>Of course, as I just admitted, my mother and I were already perpetrating that feminine stereotype by shopping while the men sat and had donuts&#8230;Also, in an earlier pregnancy, when I was carrying a son, I bought very little in the way of clothing, and only one item in any color other than yellow, green or white, and that one because my husband picked out the blue with tools and &#8216;daddy&#8217;s litle helper&#8217;.  When I was having a boy, I was preoccupied with trying to keep everything &#8216;gender neutral&#8217; but as soon as there was a girl on the way, the rules changed to anything goes.</p>
<p>Dunno what that says about me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-34850</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-34850</guid>
		<description>One dumb onesie on an illiterate baby is not a problem, I agree. But I urge you to examine the larger cultural framework that makes this slogan, as you say, a &quot;joke.&quot; The negative message of the feminine body-image mandate superimposed on a baby is just repulsive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One dumb onesie on an illiterate baby is not a problem, I agree. But I urge you to examine the larger cultural framework that makes this slogan, as you say, a &#8220;joke.&#8221; The negative message of the feminine body-image mandate superimposed on a baby is just repulsive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mar Iguana</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-34840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mar Iguana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-34840</guid>
		<description>&quot;...not everything relating to girls/body image/sexuality IS sexist.&quot;  Joanna

What isn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;not everything relating to girls/body image/sexuality IS sexist.&#8221;  Joanna</p>
<p>What isn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-34822</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 03:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-34822</guid>
		<description>Hey,
I like your blog in general... but I think you&#039;re overreacting a bit on this one.  The baby can&#039;t read yet, and it&#039;s not like this shirt is going to have an impact on her self esteem... so come on - it&#039;s just a joke.  In fact, it&#039;s almost a positive mockery of what girls do to themselves - &quot;does this make my butt look big&quot; sounds so ridiculous coming from a diapered baby that its sort of a satire of the extent to which girls actually DO worry about their bodies. I&#039;m not saying I&#039;ll run out and buy this for my baby (though that&#039;s for other reasons) but just remember - there are a lot of sexist people out there, but nonetheless not everything relating to girls/body image/sexuality IS sexist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,<br />
I like your blog in general&#8230; but I think you&#8217;re overreacting a bit on this one.  The baby can&#8217;t read yet, and it&#8217;s not like this shirt is going to have an impact on her self esteem&#8230; so come on &#8211; it&#8217;s just a joke.  In fact, it&#8217;s almost a positive mockery of what girls do to themselves &#8211; &#8220;does this make my butt look big&#8221; sounds so ridiculous coming from a diapered baby that its sort of a satire of the extent to which girls actually DO worry about their bodies. I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;ll run out and buy this for my baby (though that&#8217;s for other reasons) but just remember &#8211; there are a lot of sexist people out there, but nonetheless not everything relating to girls/body image/sexuality IS sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrespassersW</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33912</link>
		<dc:creator>TrespassersW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33912</guid>
		<description>Hi Lara. Pink camouflage print? So now the girls can all ape trained killers too? In their own fluffy way of course. Great! 

I live in the UK so that&#039;s where I&#039;m getting the trucks and dogs.   But we have plenty of graffiti too. The patriarchy is clearly terrified of letting little boys wear anything other than stereotypically masculine stuff. 

In my limited personal experience, I find the cheaper the store the more hideous the clothing and the more obvious the camouflage/candyfloss divide. If you look at horrifically overpriced designer stuff you get a slightly less stereotypical range and your boy is allowed paler colours until an older age. A lot of it is French. I went to France recently and the kiddie clothes section of this supermarket had better range of colours that blended across the genders. Still a divide but not as bad as in the UK. Back in my own country, I could not believe how long it took me to find plain white socks recently so I could pass them from girl to boy later on. Clearly the patriarchy deems plain white socks too serious for a girl and too wimpish for a boy. 

Is it just me or has this pink/blue divide got worse? Looking back at photos of my youth, I see brown corduroy flares, paisley, tartan and stripy viscose jumpers that that would make your hair stand on end, literally and figuratively, but we all seemed to be in technicolour hell together, boys and girls alike. Not so any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lara. Pink camouflage print? So now the girls can all ape trained killers too? In their own fluffy way of course. Great! </p>
<p>I live in the UK so that&#8217;s where I&#8217;m getting the trucks and dogs.   But we have plenty of graffiti too. The patriarchy is clearly terrified of letting little boys wear anything other than stereotypically masculine stuff. </p>
<p>In my limited personal experience, I find the cheaper the store the more hideous the clothing and the more obvious the camouflage/candyfloss divide. If you look at horrifically overpriced designer stuff you get a slightly less stereotypical range and your boy is allowed paler colours until an older age. A lot of it is French. I went to France recently and the kiddie clothes section of this supermarket had better range of colours that blended across the genders. Still a divide but not as bad as in the UK. Back in my own country, I could not believe how long it took me to find plain white socks recently so I could pass them from girl to boy later on. Clearly the patriarchy deems plain white socks too serious for a girl and too wimpish for a boy. </p>
<p>Is it just me or has this pink/blue divide got worse? Looking back at photos of my youth, I see brown corduroy flares, paisley, tartan and stripy viscose jumpers that that would make your hair stand on end, literally and figuratively, but we all seemed to be in technicolour hell together, boys and girls alike. Not so any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33889</link>
		<dc:creator>Lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33889</guid>
		<description>&quot;But my perennial dislike is camouflage in the boysâ€™ clothing sections. Personally I think dressing a kid like a trained killer is deeply disturbing.&quot;

Word, TrespassersW, word.

There is also an epidemic here of pink camouflage prints.

And I&#039;d like to know where you&#039;re finding the relatively innocuous trucks and animals prints; the non-military preschooler boys&#039; clothes here seem to focus on motorcycle, graffiti and skull-and-crossbones prints. If they don&#039;t have slogans like &quot;Here Comes Trouble&quot; or &quot;Heartbreaker&quot; on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But my perennial dislike is camouflage in the boysâ€™ clothing sections. Personally I think dressing a kid like a trained killer is deeply disturbing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Word, TrespassersW, word.</p>
<p>There is also an epidemic here of pink camouflage prints.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;d like to know where you&#8217;re finding the relatively innocuous trucks and animals prints; the non-military preschooler boys&#8217; clothes here seem to focus on motorcycle, graffiti and skull-and-crossbones prints. If they don&#8217;t have slogans like &#8220;Here Comes Trouble&#8221; or &#8220;Heartbreaker&#8221; on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrespassersW</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33873</link>
		<dc:creator>TrespassersW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33873</guid>
		<description>There are all sorts of stupid slogans out there. Here are some offenders: 
&quot;Boys are strong. Bury them deep.&quot; I don&#039;t advocate violence against anybody. 
&quot;I love to shop.&quot; (on pink)
&quot;Saw it, wanted it, threw a tantrum, got it.&quot; (on pink)
&quot;Do I look like I&#039;m bothered?&quot; and various other versions giving out some kind of attitude. 
&quot;I didn&#039;t ask to be a princess but if the crown fits..&quot; 
But my perennial dislike is camouflage in the boys&#039; clothing sections. Personally I think dressing a kid like a trained killer is deeply disturbing. It&#039;s also noteworthy how how you can get pastels for baby boys up to age two or so but then they are forced into dark colours as if that&#039;s when a parent ought to start training them out of anything associated with that inferior business of femininity. Meanwhile, it&#039;s nigh-on impossible to buy anything plain for a girl: everything is covered in frills and flowers. If you go to the boy&#039;s section to buy her something that&#039;s not pink or lilac, you can get navy, red, bile green, mud and khaki but it will have stereotypical trucks, submarines, cars and dogs plastered all over it. Boys get dogs, girls get cats, by the way. 
Gender stereotyping starts appallingly early and manufacturers know they can rake in twice as much money by forcing the distinction. 

On a related point, the &quot;worth the wait&quot; slogan seems to me to refer to nothing more sinister than that pregnancy can be a long, tiring, anxious nine months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are all sorts of stupid slogans out there. Here are some offenders:<br />
&#8220;Boys are strong. Bury them deep.&#8221; I don&#8217;t advocate violence against anybody.<br />
&#8220;I love to shop.&#8221; (on pink)<br />
&#8220;Saw it, wanted it, threw a tantrum, got it.&#8221; (on pink)<br />
&#8220;Do I look like I&#8217;m bothered?&#8221; and various other versions giving out some kind of attitude.<br />
&#8220;I didn&#8217;t ask to be a princess but if the crown fits..&#8221;<br />
But my perennial dislike is camouflage in the boys&#8217; clothing sections. Personally I think dressing a kid like a trained killer is deeply disturbing. It&#8217;s also noteworthy how how you can get pastels for baby boys up to age two or so but then they are forced into dark colours as if that&#8217;s when a parent ought to start training them out of anything associated with that inferior business of femininity. Meanwhile, it&#8217;s nigh-on impossible to buy anything plain for a girl: everything is covered in frills and flowers. If you go to the boy&#8217;s section to buy her something that&#8217;s not pink or lilac, you can get navy, red, bile green, mud and khaki but it will have stereotypical trucks, submarines, cars and dogs plastered all over it. Boys get dogs, girls get cats, by the way.<br />
Gender stereotyping starts appallingly early and manufacturers know they can rake in twice as much money by forcing the distinction. </p>
<p>On a related point, the &#8220;worth the wait&#8221; slogan seems to me to refer to nothing more sinister than that pregnancy can be a long, tiring, anxious nine months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandos</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33742</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 22:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33742</guid>
		<description>Who knows?  If things go right, I might visit Berkeley in May.  We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows?  If things go right, I might visit Berkeley in May.  We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33738</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33738</guid>
		<description>J -- We make frequent trips to Davis, especially in winter, mostly chasing birds but also visiting friends and/or the arboretum. It&#039;s a great town for beer. Not half bad for food either. Gets hot in summer, but I understand that&#039;s true of many places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J &#8212; We make frequent trips to Davis, especially in winter, mostly chasing birds but also visiting friends and/or the arboretum. It&#8217;s a great town for beer. Not half bad for food either. Gets hot in summer, but I understand that&#8217;s true of many places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naz</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33657</link>
		<dc:creator>Naz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/01/20/parents-of-today-sex-up-those-babies/#comment-33657</guid>
		<description>Wunzies / onesies. Potayto potahto. We call them &#039;growers&#039; here in ZA. I guess coz that&#039;s what babies wear during that rapid growth phase. :P

Lately I&#039;ve been covetting the hand sewn flea market onesies that say &quot;Made in Africa&quot;. (Get it? Heh-heh-heh)

Anyway. I totally agree with you Twisty. 

I often shop at Woolies (very similar to the UK&#039;s Marks &amp; Spencers) for stuff for my niece and nephews. Its the one-stop place for middle to upper middle class peeps to get their kiddie gear. And what always bugs me is that the little t-shirts that say &quot;Troublemaker&quot; and &quot;It wasn&#039;t me&quot; or &quot;Impending tantrum&quot; can only be found in the boys section. Its not quite the same pseudo-sexualizing that happens for little girls but its the same thing, of trying to mould little boys into aggressive, rebellious little maniacs. Condoning anti-social behaviour in boys. But heaven forbid your little girl be a &quot;Troublemaker&quot;. Oh no, she needs to be a &quot;Heartbreaker&quot;.

Meanwhile, across the aisle all the little girls clothes are designed exclusively in shades of purple, pink and yellow. Oh, and lets not forget the g-string underwear and bras for eight year olds. (Yes, Woolies - you know I mean you!) Last time I looked, eight year old girls didn&#039;t have breasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wunzies / onesies. Potayto potahto. We call them &#8216;growers&#8217; here in ZA. I guess coz that&#8217;s what babies wear during that rapid growth phase. :P</p>
<p>Lately I&#8217;ve been covetting the hand sewn flea market onesies that say &#8220;Made in Africa&#8221;. (Get it? Heh-heh-heh)</p>
<p>Anyway. I totally agree with you Twisty. </p>
<p>I often shop at Woolies (very similar to the UK&#8217;s Marks &amp; Spencers) for stuff for my niece and nephews. Its the one-stop place for middle to upper middle class peeps to get their kiddie gear. And what always bugs me is that the little t-shirts that say &#8220;Troublemaker&#8221; and &#8220;It wasn&#8217;t me&#8221; or &#8220;Impending tantrum&#8221; can only be found in the boys section. Its not quite the same pseudo-sexualizing that happens for little girls but its the same thing, of trying to mould little boys into aggressive, rebellious little maniacs. Condoning anti-social behaviour in boys. But heaven forbid your little girl be a &#8220;Troublemaker&#8221;. Oh no, she needs to be a &#8220;Heartbreaker&#8221;.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, across the aisle all the little girls clothes are designed exclusively in shades of purple, pink and yellow. Oh, and lets not forget the g-string underwear and bras for eight year olds. (Yes, Woolies &#8211; you know I mean you!) Last time I looked, eight year old girls didn&#8217;t have breasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

