Comments on: Tuesday T&B

By: God is for Suckers! - Commentary, news, and rants on the evils and stupidity of belief in the big invisible daddy in the sky. Illuminating and watchdogging the widespread attempts to institutionalize the theocratic rule of the US. Making fun of believers

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:04:06 +0000

[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Leave aReply [...]

By: lalalu

lalalu — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:16:09 +0000

i imagine tentacles slurping and smushing brains.

By: Christopher

Christopher — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:40:52 +0000

Me, I’m too contrarian for Buddhism.

I dunno, whenever I hear Buddhists talk about their religion there’s as much nonsense about getting off the wheel of life as there is about getting into heaven from the Christians.

It’s all about how the world is filled with incorrect thinking that causes suffering.

Feh.

Wait, what was this post about again?

Oh.

Here’s a questiom: If, as you have often stated, Ms. Faster, has its hands on everybody, and if, when they make stuff that’s tainted with the patriarchy, it’s not art, aren’t you more or less asserting that art doesn’t exist?

What’s the point of defining art as “something that doesn’t exist yet”?

By: Roo

Roo — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:40:10 +0000

Hmm, the image didn’t come through. Here’s the link.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/werdnus/DavidandGoliath.jpg

By: Roo

Roo — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:39:12 +0000

Art, Truth, and Beauty.

I’m really surprised that in a discussion of Art, no images have been bandied about yet.

By: Mar Iguana

Mar Iguana — Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:07:20 +0000

“Iâ€™m not sure, but I think Iâ€™ve been insulted.”

I think so. Yep.

By: clew

clew — Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:35:23 +0000

Distinguishing between taste and touch is mere eukaryotism. We will never reach the diffuse consciousness of enlightenment until we return to our prokaryote roots.

(It is only the cells which can incorporate external DNA which are called ‘competent’. On the other hand, we make them so by shocking them. I don’t know what this is a metaphor for.)

I don’t think contentment is necessarily static–one can be content and immensely curious at the same time. Also, there might be utopias in which it was ‘merely’ possible for everyone to reach their full individual content potential; there would still be plenty of stories about the different ways people did so, or failed to do so.

By: thebewilderness

thebewilderness — Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:09:24 +0000

I think the description of Twisty prose as “crudely transcribed” is deserving of a three hundred comment flame war.
Christopher Bradley, how dare you use the “crudely transcribed” insult. You sir, are the crudely transcribed one.

By: Twisty

Twisty — Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:03:38 +0000

Christopher Bradley: “You come to a blog where you pour through reality filtered through someone elseâ€™s perceptions, crudely transcribed [...]“

I’m not sure, but I think I’ve been insulted.

By: LMYC

LMYC — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:14:31 +0000

I should have said “I don’t care about biases when learning what people have to say.”