<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yo, taqueau</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65054</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 02:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65054</guid>
		<description>OK, that&#039;s IT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, that&#8217;s IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: half breed</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65052</link>
		<dc:creator>half breed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 02:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65052</guid>
		<description>I think you have let her make this comment Twisty, these post long slurs taunts and baiting, only because it was made against my race. Half breed.

Half breed belongs no where. Half breed is reviled and raped by white and coloured alike. Half breed is what you better live in fear of Virago, if we ever meet in flesh I&#039;ll rip yours. I have no intellect. Do not no how to argue you. So I will strike out physically. I will cut you if I ever meet you because I&#039;ve got nothing to lose. I&#039;m half breed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have let her make this comment Twisty, these post long slurs taunts and baiting, only because it was made against my race. Half breed.</p>
<p>Half breed belongs no where. Half breed is reviled and raped by white and coloured alike. Half breed is what you better live in fear of Virago, if we ever meet in flesh I&#8217;ll rip yours. I have no intellect. Do not no how to argue you. So I will strike out physically. I will cut you if I ever meet you because I&#8217;ve got nothing to lose. I&#8217;m half breed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: half breed</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65047</link>
		<dc:creator>half breed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65047</guid>
		<description>&quot;Discrimination on the basis of race is so invasive that, yes, even POC resort to it.&quot;  Is this your apology? 


You attack Mar Iguana and me (when as far as I know I was in no discussion let alone argument with you until you used that term pseudo white and all that you wrapped around it. You RACIST! 

YOU are the POC who has resorted to &quot;discrimination on the basis of race.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Discrimination on the basis of race is so invasive that, yes, even POC resort to it.&#8221;  Is this your apology? </p>
<p>You attack Mar Iguana and me (when as far as I know I was in no discussion let alone argument with you until you used that term pseudo white and all that you wrapped around it. You RACIST! </p>
<p>YOU are the POC who has resorted to &#8220;discrimination on the basis of race.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spit The Dummy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65046</link>
		<dc:creator>Spit The Dummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65046</guid>
		<description>Virago:

&quot;spit the dummy&quot;: Baulk at, get angry about, or simply, obstinately refuse to do, something. A dummy is what some Americans call a pacifier, and when a baby spits the dummy it just can&#039;t be pacified.

I&#039;ve been accused of doing this about feminist issues my entire life, so the nickname seemed appropriate for this site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virago:</p>
<p>&#8220;spit the dummy&#8221;: Baulk at, get angry about, or simply, obstinately refuse to do, something. A dummy is what some Americans call a pacifier, and when a baby spits the dummy it just can&#8217;t be pacified.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been accused of doing this about feminist issues my entire life, so the nickname seemed appropriate for this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LouisaMayAlcott</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65045</link>
		<dc:creator>LouisaMayAlcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65045</guid>
		<description>MedeaOnCrack,

I parse this whole thing exactly as you do.

I wish you the blessings of Kitchen Happiness, and Joy in the existence of this Beautiful Earth. Success and Satisfaction in the pusuit of your best physical health. 

Good night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MedeaOnCrack,</p>
<p>I parse this whole thing exactly as you do.</p>
<p>I wish you the blessings of Kitchen Happiness, and Joy in the existence of this Beautiful Earth. Success and Satisfaction in the pusuit of your best physical health. </p>
<p>Good night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virago</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65043</link>
		<dc:creator>Virago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65043</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more than happy to shut down this discussion when I see what it&#039;s become--and be happy to take this discussion to email if you&#039;d like, therealUK. I really am interested in hearing about your experiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more than happy to shut down this discussion when I see what it&#8217;s become&#8211;and be happy to take this discussion to email if you&#8217;d like, therealUK. I really am interested in hearing about your experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spit The Dummy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65042</link>
		<dc:creator>Spit The Dummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65042</guid>
		<description>Virago:

In response to your second (or is is your third?) quotation of Twisty&#039;s comment, what I&#039;m trying to say is that &lt;i&gt;on this blog&lt;/i&gt; the idea is that feminism is most important because &lt;i&gt;on this blog&lt;/i&gt; it is set up that way.  We can discuss other things and believe other things to be equally or more important but &lt;i&gt;for the purposes of this blog&lt;/i&gt;  nothing is more important than feminism. I don&#039;t come here to argue about which &quot;ism&quot; is most important to fight for first because &lt;i&gt;on this blog&lt;/i&gt; I don&#039;t want to have to defend feminism AT ALL.  Even against racism.  Or world hunger.  Or genocide.  Against ANYTHING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virago:</p>
<p>In response to your second (or is is your third?) quotation of Twisty&#8217;s comment, what I&#8217;m trying to say is that <i>on this blog</i> the idea is that feminism is most important because <i>on this blog</i> it is set up that way.  We can discuss other things and believe other things to be equally or more important but <i>for the purposes of this blog</i>  nothing is more important than feminism. I don&#8217;t come here to argue about which &#8220;ism&#8221; is most important to fight for first because <i>on this blog</i> I don&#8217;t want to have to defend feminism AT ALL.  Even against racism.  Or world hunger.  Or genocide.  Against ANYTHING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virago</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65041</link>
		<dc:creator>Virago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65041</guid>
		<description>therealUK writes:

&lt;i&gt;I will relate more to people who hold the same basic principles I do&lt;/i&gt;

I agree. Unfortunately, the way that works in practice has meant that, even though we adopt the shared mantle of feminism, it absolutely doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that we hold the same basic principles in regards to race or class.  

Discrimination on the basis of race is so invasive that, yes, even POC resort to it.  It&#039;s a real problem in American feminism (I should just admit right now that I am guilty of knowing little outside of American, black/African-American, and Chicana issues in regards to feminism), a real problem that drives women away from feminism. 

And why should women adopt the principles of a movement that doesn&#039;t take into account their concerns as women of color? I have, but I get very leery of continuing to do so when I see how WOC&#039;s issues are marginalized.

&lt;i&gt;the divisions that already exist in wider society are often not addressed for what they really are but end up being blamed on â€œfeminism** (because itâ€™s racist and only for white women(???!!))â€.

In America, yes, feminism &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; often believed to be racist and only for white women. That isn&#039;t a view from outside the feminist movement, either. It comes from within the movement as well. 

White women have a &lt;i&gt;smidge&lt;/i&gt; more privilege (yes, because of the efforts of feminists) and that allows them to have the greater ability (versus WOC) to fight the patriarchy--but it also means that the racism white women almost invariable harbor becomes part of the movement.

I think addressing these issues means that a lot of people would have to back down from a lot of privilege and convincing people to give up privilege is, to put it mildly, very difficult. In my own experience, it is extremely difficult for me to do so, so I understand this.

&lt;i&gt;*there is racism everywhere of course, itâ€™s part of the patriarchal package, but just because it plays out one way in USA does not mean it plays out like that everywhere.&lt;/i&gt;

I definitely am interested in hearing about your experience in the UK (and, well, wherever you have experience with feminism), therealUK. As you Spit the Dummy (is this an Australian term?) rightfully  points out, there is a world outide the continental US, outside America, and those voices are missing from my experience (and, I would guess, from the experience of most American feminists). In other words, I know fuck-all about feminism in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>therealUK writes:</p>
<p><i>I will relate more to people who hold the same basic principles I do</i></p>
<p>I agree. Unfortunately, the way that works in practice has meant that, even though we adopt the shared mantle of feminism, it absolutely doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that we hold the same basic principles in regards to race or class.  </p>
<p>Discrimination on the basis of race is so invasive that, yes, even POC resort to it.  It&#8217;s a real problem in American feminism (I should just admit right now that I am guilty of knowing little outside of American, black/African-American, and Chicana issues in regards to feminism), a real problem that drives women away from feminism. </p>
<p>And why should women adopt the principles of a movement that doesn&#8217;t take into account their concerns as women of color? I have, but I get very leery of continuing to do so when I see how WOC&#8217;s issues are marginalized.</p>
<p><i>the divisions that already exist in wider society are often not addressed for what they really are but end up being blamed on â€œfeminism** (because itâ€™s racist and only for white women(???!!))â€.</p>
<p>In America, yes, feminism </i><i>is</i> often believed to be racist and only for white women. That isn&#8217;t a view from outside the feminist movement, either. It comes from within the movement as well. </p>
<p>White women have a <i>smidge</i> more privilege (yes, because of the efforts of feminists) and that allows them to have the greater ability (versus WOC) to fight the patriarchy&#8211;but it also means that the racism white women almost invariable harbor becomes part of the movement.</p>
<p>I think addressing these issues means that a lot of people would have to back down from a lot of privilege and convincing people to give up privilege is, to put it mildly, very difficult. In my own experience, it is extremely difficult for me to do so, so I understand this.</p>
<p><i>*there is racism everywhere of course, itâ€™s part of the patriarchal package, but just because it plays out one way in USA does not mean it plays out like that everywhere.</i></p>
<p>I definitely am interested in hearing about your experience in the UK (and, well, wherever you have experience with feminism), therealUK. As you Spit the Dummy (is this an Australian term?) rightfully  points out, there is a world outide the continental US, outside America, and those voices are missing from my experience (and, I would guess, from the experience of most American feminists). In other words, I know fuck-all about feminism in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spit The Dummy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65040</link>
		<dc:creator>Spit The Dummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65040</guid>
		<description>Virago said: &lt;i&gt;Sounds like I hit close to home with you both, MarIguana and Medea. Virago-directed ad hominem attacks are par for the course when this happens. As now, they fall on deaf ears. (Iâ€™m sure youâ€™re reading this now, MarIguana, as itâ€™s been made clear that your views are not welcome on the latest, transgender-centric thread. What will you do with all your free time?)&lt;/i&gt;

Virago, your claims of having been the victim of ad-hominem attacks by MarIguana and MedeoOnCrack would be more effective if you didn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;immediately&lt;/i&gt; follow them with an  attack on MarIguana!  An attack on MarIguana&#039;s opinions on a different subject  even. Why is another thread on a totally different subject at all relevant to this one, except for the fact that you disgreed with MarIguana&#039;s opinion on that thread, too?  

&lt;i&gt;I was extra careful in using American WOC in my comment to therealUK, and she seemed to have no problem with that designation. &lt;/i&gt;  

If you mean by &quot;no problem&quot; she remained polite, then I agree with you.  However, she did have to keep re-stating her arguments because you failed to  understand them.  Just as, I notice, you failed to understand quite a lot of other comments on this thread.  You&#039;ll forgive me but you seem to be so involved in what you want to say that you aren&#039;t really LISTENING to what other people are saying.  The fact that other women of colour are disagreeing with you should be a flag for you to consider the &lt;i&gt;possibility&lt;/i&gt; that somebody here may have a point of view worth listening to.  Otherwise, why are you here?  You make many interesting points but it would be a shame if your zeal made you deaf to all other points of view, especially on a list such as this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virago said: <i>Sounds like I hit close to home with you both, MarIguana and Medea. Virago-directed ad hominem attacks are par for the course when this happens. As now, they fall on deaf ears. (Iâ€™m sure youâ€™re reading this now, MarIguana, as itâ€™s been made clear that your views are not welcome on the latest, transgender-centric thread. What will you do with all your free time?)</i></p>
<p>Virago, your claims of having been the victim of ad-hominem attacks by MarIguana and MedeoOnCrack would be more effective if you didn&#8217;t <i>immediately</i> follow them with an  attack on MarIguana!  An attack on MarIguana&#8217;s opinions on a different subject  even. Why is another thread on a totally different subject at all relevant to this one, except for the fact that you disgreed with MarIguana&#8217;s opinion on that thread, too?  </p>
<p><i>I was extra careful in using American WOC in my comment to therealUK, and she seemed to have no problem with that designation. </i>  </p>
<p>If you mean by &#8220;no problem&#8221; she remained polite, then I agree with you.  However, she did have to keep re-stating her arguments because you failed to  understand them.  Just as, I notice, you failed to understand quite a lot of other comments on this thread.  You&#8217;ll forgive me but you seem to be so involved in what you want to say that you aren&#8217;t really LISTENING to what other people are saying.  The fact that other women of colour are disagreeing with you should be a flag for you to consider the <i>possibility</i> that somebody here may have a point of view worth listening to.  Otherwise, why are you here?  You make many interesting points but it would be a shame if your zeal made you deaf to all other points of view, especially on a list such as this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MedeaOnCrack</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65037</link>
		<dc:creator>MedeaOnCrack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 01:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/05/22/yo-taqueau/#comment-65037</guid>
		<description>Pseudo-white? Why does this racist remark not upset you Twisty. I am not pseudo anything. But I am enraged that this remark can be directed to me. When I was growing up I was HALF BREED HALF BREED CUNT. Now I&#039;m pseudo-white, called that by another woman (ostensibly) on a feminist blog? Called names, pseudo white, on a blog that purports to be anti-racist. Do you have any idea what pseudo white means? WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A HALF BREED!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pseudo-white? Why does this racist remark not upset you Twisty. I am not pseudo anything. But I am enraged that this remark can be directed to me. When I was growing up I was HALF BREED HALF BREED CUNT. Now I&#8217;m pseudo-white, called that by another woman (ostensibly) on a feminist blog? Called names, pseudo white, on a blog that purports to be anti-racist. Do you have any idea what pseudo white means? WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A HALF BREED!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

