<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The post on marriage</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SoJo</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-118174</link>
		<author>SoJo</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-118174</guid>
		<description>Cohabitation with heterosexual men is impossible.

I spent 2 weeks with one which eventuated in my being confined to the apartment once the sun set, no transport and no food.

The physical restrictions are nothing compared to the mental ones. I felt 100 times more trapped than I actually was and ended up suffering psychosis. 
In 2 weeks.
And the man never knew this, never to this day thought anything was wrong in those 2 weeks.


So today, as India Arie says, "I'm alone but never lonely".


And hey Gumleaf, I never would have guessed a Sydneysider was here! I'm from Melbourne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cohabitation with heterosexual men is impossible.</p>
<p>I spent 2 weeks with one which eventuated in my being confined to the apartment once the sun set, no transport and no food.</p>
<p>The physical restrictions are nothing compared to the mental ones. I felt 100 times more trapped than I actually was and ended up suffering psychosis.<br />
In 2 weeks.<br />
And the man never knew this, never to this day thought anything was wrong in those 2 weeks.</p>
<p>So today, as India Arie says, &#8220;I&#8217;m alone but never lonely&#8221;.</p>
<p>And hey Gumleaf, I never would have guessed a Sydneysider was here! I&#8217;m from Melbourne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gumleaf</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-110040</link>
		<author>Gumleaf</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-110040</guid>
		<description>"Thanks for the compliment, Gumleaf, but if it’s “hetero” women you’re looking for, this may not be your home after all."

Meh. I don't care about peoples sexuality one way or the other; if mine isn't an issue, I have no issues with theirs. I belong to the school of thought that says people have about as much control over who they're attracted to as I have over my eye colour. I don't care what shape or form these like-minded souls to discuss feminism and patriarchy come in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thanks for the compliment, Gumleaf, but if it’s “hetero” women you’re looking for, this may not be your home after all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meh. I don&#8217;t care about peoples sexuality one way or the other; if mine isn&#8217;t an issue, I have no issues with theirs. I belong to the school of thought that says people have about as much control over who they&#8217;re attracted to as I have over my eye colour. I don&#8217;t care what shape or form these like-minded souls to discuss feminism and patriarchy come in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-110002</link>
		<author>Twisty</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-110002</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliment, Gumleaf, but if it's "hetero" women you're looking for, this may not be your home after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliment, Gumleaf, but if it&#8217;s &#8220;hetero&#8221; women you&#8217;re looking for, this may not be your home after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gumleaf</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-109973</link>
		<author>Gumleaf</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-109973</guid>
		<description>Wow. I feel like I've come home. Why can't I meet a group of like-minded individuals - strong feminist hetero women my age- to discuss these things with in my own city (Sydney, Australia). I've already lost one friend because I lent her Maucharts 'Wifework' hoping she might wake up to how oppressed she is in her marriage (she went with it for while but then gradually stopped contacting me - I guess she had to make a choice and she chose the security of the patriarchy she knew -even though she's said she doesn't want to have kids because she's already taking care of one child). I'm hoping she'll come around.

Most of the rest of my friends pay lipservice to feminism but don't really like to talk about it, and then there are the friends I lost to marriage and the patriarchy ages ago, after I had to watch them rationalise the inequality in their relationships and eventual marriages.

It's depressing that there are not more like minded girls around who I can blame the patriarchy with over some mojitos - the most committed feminist I know is a guy I'm having a email conversation with - I have to fight to stop myself from imagining a future non-married life with him.

But at last, I found you all!

Fantastic site Twisty, and so good to hear echoes of thoughts I thought I was clever enough to have developed on my own (all through 'wifework' I was mentally exclaiming 'but this is what I've been saying for years!!!'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I feel like I&#8217;ve come home. Why can&#8217;t I meet a group of like-minded individuals - strong feminist hetero women my age- to discuss these things with in my own city (Sydney, Australia). I&#8217;ve already lost one friend because I lent her Maucharts &#8216;Wifework&#8217; hoping she might wake up to how oppressed she is in her marriage (she went with it for while but then gradually stopped contacting me - I guess she had to make a choice and she chose the security of the patriarchy she knew -even though she&#8217;s said she doesn&#8217;t want to have kids because she&#8217;s already taking care of one child). I&#8217;m hoping she&#8217;ll come around.</p>
<p>Most of the rest of my friends pay lipservice to feminism but don&#8217;t really like to talk about it, and then there are the friends I lost to marriage and the patriarchy ages ago, after I had to watch them rationalise the inequality in their relationships and eventual marriages.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s depressing that there are not more like minded girls around who I can blame the patriarchy with over some mojitos - the most committed feminist I know is a guy I&#8217;m having a email conversation with - I have to fight to stop myself from imagining a future non-married life with him.</p>
<p>But at last, I found you all!</p>
<p>Fantastic site Twisty, and so good to hear echoes of thoughts I thought I was clever enough to have developed on my own (all through &#8216;wifework&#8217; I was mentally exclaiming &#8216;but this is what I&#8217;ve been saying for years!!!&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nineveh Two</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-108767</link>
		<author>Nineveh Two</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-108767</guid>
		<description>I like that you wrote this.

I've been involved monogamously with the love of my life for 14 years. We're not married (although he has asked), in large part because I am afraid of falling into the exact social traps you mentioned. I don't want to become domestic or motherly or even wifely. I don't want "wife" as part of my identity.

But at the same time, those tax breaks sure would be nice. 

In theory, I don't mind the idea of legally recognized partnerships, it's just "marriage" that I don't particularly like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that you wrote this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been involved monogamously with the love of my life for 14 years. We&#8217;re not married (although he has asked), in large part because I am afraid of falling into the exact social traps you mentioned. I don&#8217;t want to become domestic or motherly or even wifely. I don&#8217;t want &#8220;wife&#8221; as part of my identity.</p>
<p>But at the same time, those tax breaks sure would be nice. </p>
<p>In theory, I don&#8217;t mind the idea of legally recognized partnerships, it&#8217;s just &#8220;marriage&#8221; that I don&#8217;t particularly like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-108430</link>
		<author>Dana</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-108430</guid>
		<description>Offering a few thoughts about parenthood having to do with some of the ideas offered here:  Reproduction is inherently selfish, because it is the one route we have to immortality.  Some part of us will always be living if we have descendants.  It will eventually be watered the hell down with other people's genes the more generations pass, but it is the key to continuance of life.  If the biological reality has translated into cultural reality somewhat (i.e., because reproduction has the "selfish" effect of granting a kind of immortality, people culturally want to reproduce for consciously selfish reasons as well), as long as the kids aren't being abused or turned neurotic by the situation, I don't really care.  My philosophy about intentions is that I never know what someone else is thinking if they don't tell me;  what is more important to me is how they behave.  A person can have children for selfish reasons (i.e., having selfish intentions), but still raise them very well.  It happens.

As for possessiveness of children, that at least partly stems from parental instinct.  I don't believe people are automatically hardwired with parental instinct, by the way.  We are a social species, so how well our various social instincts develop depends on a lot of factors which may or may not be present or adequately developed in individual situations.  For example, if a woman has a baby but the baby is immediately taken away and kept from her, her mothering instincts will be severely truncated or never develop at all because they depend on certain hormonal surges brought on by interaction with her baby.  Where raising children is concerned, it benefits the children if the parents feel attached to them because that decreases their chances of abandonment.  So a certain amount of possessiveness is desirable.

But the cool part is, a scenario like you envision with many adults raising one child can still potentially happen.  Even if they did not give birth to the child, adults can still become emotionally attached to that child and want to raise her, socialize her properly and further her survival.  This is how dads become attached to their infants if they aren't fucking wankers who drop a load and then ignore the kid until she's old enough to talk football scores, since fathers don't have the mothering hormones.  It is also how moms themselves attach to their children if they and their babies got off to a bad start.  So, definitely doable.  In fact, honestly, children do better in a tribal environment than they do in the present social setup.  They need to be around people of all ages, and they need to see adults doing the work of the adult culture.  What they currently have stunts their maturation process and leaves them dependent on a fucked-up social system, and it isn't just moms being at-home wives and mothers, or dads being patriarchal bullies, it's other things like schooling, families being isolated from one another, and people being segregated by age.  IBTP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Offering a few thoughts about parenthood having to do with some of the ideas offered here:  Reproduction is inherently selfish, because it is the one route we have to immortality.  Some part of us will always be living if we have descendants.  It will eventually be watered the hell down with other people&#8217;s genes the more generations pass, but it is the key to continuance of life.  If the biological reality has translated into cultural reality somewhat (i.e., because reproduction has the &#8220;selfish&#8221; effect of granting a kind of immortality, people culturally want to reproduce for consciously selfish reasons as well), as long as the kids aren&#8217;t being abused or turned neurotic by the situation, I don&#8217;t really care.  My philosophy about intentions is that I never know what someone else is thinking if they don&#8217;t tell me;  what is more important to me is how they behave.  A person can have children for selfish reasons (i.e., having selfish intentions), but still raise them very well.  It happens.</p>
<p>As for possessiveness of children, that at least partly stems from parental instinct.  I don&#8217;t believe people are automatically hardwired with parental instinct, by the way.  We are a social species, so how well our various social instincts develop depends on a lot of factors which may or may not be present or adequately developed in individual situations.  For example, if a woman has a baby but the baby is immediately taken away and kept from her, her mothering instincts will be severely truncated or never develop at all because they depend on certain hormonal surges brought on by interaction with her baby.  Where raising children is concerned, it benefits the children if the parents feel attached to them because that decreases their chances of abandonment.  So a certain amount of possessiveness is desirable.</p>
<p>But the cool part is, a scenario like you envision with many adults raising one child can still potentially happen.  Even if they did not give birth to the child, adults can still become emotionally attached to that child and want to raise her, socialize her properly and further her survival.  This is how dads become attached to their infants if they aren&#8217;t fucking wankers who drop a load and then ignore the kid until she&#8217;s old enough to talk football scores, since fathers don&#8217;t have the mothering hormones.  It is also how moms themselves attach to their children if they and their babies got off to a bad start.  So, definitely doable.  In fact, honestly, children do better in a tribal environment than they do in the present social setup.  They need to be around people of all ages, and they need to see adults doing the work of the adult culture.  What they currently have stunts their maturation process and leaves them dependent on a fucked-up social system, and it isn&#8217;t just moms being at-home wives and mothers, or dads being patriarchal bullies, it&#8217;s other things like schooling, families being isolated from one another, and people being segregated by age.  IBTP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacon, I bid you farewell at I Blame The Patriarchy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-105259</link>
		<author>Bacon, I bid you farewell at I Blame The Patriarchy</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-105259</guid>
		<description>[...] the record, I myself do not &#8220;support&#8221; gay marriage, or any other kind of marriage. See this post for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the record, I myself do not &#8220;support&#8221; gay marriage, or any other kind of marriage. See this post for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kylie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-101241</link>
		<author>Kylie</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-101241</guid>
		<description>I'm a single mother living with my younger brother.  We almost have a husband/wife relationship, as although we both work long hours, he never NEVER does any cooking/cleaning etc, except for his room, bathroom and car.  He does, however like his dinner cooked for him, and lunch to take to work.  I don't know why I put up with it, but I think it's because he's my baby bro and I love him so much.  Plus I already have one kid, just adding one more is not that hard.  It's MUCH easier than when I was with my son's father, I can tell you that.  I was a slave in that relationship.  Okay, I can see that I need to get some control of my life.  Anyway, my little bro's a strong, practising, born-again Christian, and he's a virgin (at 21) saving himself for marriage.  I'm starting to feel very responsible for spoiling him now, because he's going to expect his future wife to do everything I do for him!!!  AArrrgh!  I think he's fully planning on having a wife so he can have hot meals and clean laundry and children to play with.  Should I do anything about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a single mother living with my younger brother.  We almost have a husband/wife relationship, as although we both work long hours, he never NEVER does any cooking/cleaning etc, except for his room, bathroom and car.  He does, however like his dinner cooked for him, and lunch to take to work.  I don&#8217;t know why I put up with it, but I think it&#8217;s because he&#8217;s my baby bro and I love him so much.  Plus I already have one kid, just adding one more is not that hard.  It&#8217;s MUCH easier than when I was with my son&#8217;s father, I can tell you that.  I was a slave in that relationship.  Okay, I can see that I need to get some control of my life.  Anyway, my little bro&#8217;s a strong, practising, born-again Christian, and he&#8217;s a virgin (at 21) saving himself for marriage.  I&#8217;m starting to feel very responsible for spoiling him now, because he&#8217;s going to expect his future wife to do everything I do for him!!!  AArrrgh!  I think he&#8217;s fully planning on having a wife so he can have hot meals and clean laundry and children to play with.  Should I do anything about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsername</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-91901</link>
		<author>whatsername</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-91901</guid>
		<description>Like everything else you voluntarily enter into in life, marriage is what you make it, and only as sexist as you allow it to be.

Just because some people can't see that doesn't mean marriage (committing to one person hopefully for the rest of your life) is a bad thing, or a sexist thing.

If your husband doesn't do his fair share, DON'T FUCKING DO HIS SHARE.  Let it sit there until he does it.  Just THINK about what you're doing, for gods sakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like everything else you voluntarily enter into in life, marriage is what you make it, and only as sexist as you allow it to be.</p>
<p>Just because some people can&#8217;t see that doesn&#8217;t mean marriage (committing to one person hopefully for the rest of your life) is a bad thing, or a sexist thing.</p>
<p>If your husband doesn&#8217;t do his fair share, DON&#8217;T FUCKING DO HIS SHARE.  Let it sit there until he does it.  Just THINK about what you&#8217;re doing, for gods sakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarilynJean</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-84671</link>
		<author>MarilynJean</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/13/the-post-on-marriage/#comment-84671</guid>
		<description>Thewrongsortoffeminist is indeed funny. Some of these posts do sound like nothing more than the whining of middle-class, white women and not protestations against the flawed system of marriage. I ignored the solution to hire cleaning services, but to read people trying to justify doing so was even worse. The justification is worse than the act itself.

Also, I'm slightly bothered by the heterosexual women wishing they were lesbians so that they don't feel so lonely without a man or so they can enjoy egalitarian partnerships. Since when were all homosexual relationships equal? Lesbians and gay men can be just as partiarchal, lazy, sexist, racist, abusive, etc. in relationships as heterosexual, white men so please do not tell me that you'd rather date women so you can get a break from men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thewrongsortoffeminist is indeed funny. Some of these posts do sound like nothing more than the whining of middle-class, white women and not protestations against the flawed system of marriage. I ignored the solution to hire cleaning services, but to read people trying to justify doing so was even worse. The justification is worse than the act itself.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m slightly bothered by the heterosexual women wishing they were lesbians so that they don&#8217;t feel so lonely without a man or so they can enjoy egalitarian partnerships. Since when were all homosexual relationships equal? Lesbians and gay men can be just as partiarchal, lazy, sexist, racist, abusive, etc. in relationships as heterosexual, white men so please do not tell me that you&#8217;d rather date women so you can get a break from men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
