<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The post on the post on marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ginger</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168238</link>
		<dc:creator>ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168238</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I should have removed the sentence and fragment &quot;Do you know who works...Pe&quot;, since I abandoned that argument as irrelevant. (I really have been trying to stay on topic - I have a lot of passionate rants in me about workplace dangers to women who have to work crappy jobs because of their socioeconomic status, and how employers take advantage of women&#039;s underclass status to cut costs. See, I almost got started there. Sorry.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I should have removed the sentence and fragment &#8220;Do you know who works&#8230;Pe&#8221;, since I abandoned that argument as irrelevant. (I really have been trying to stay on topic &#8211; I have a lot of passionate rants in me about workplace dangers to women who have to work crappy jobs because of their socioeconomic status, and how employers take advantage of women&#8217;s underclass status to cut costs. See, I almost got started there. Sorry.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ginger</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168237</link>
		<dc:creator>ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168237</guid>
		<description>Oh, dear, I must have been unclear. I wasn&#039;t saying that dude cleaners are comparably oppressed or somehow exempted from male privilege - I was trying to say that it&#039;s not about the cleaning alone, it&#039;s about the cleaning of A HOUSE. Women are further bound to the home, restricted, made captive, by the unquestioned assumption that home duties of all sorts are their domain. This is a profoundly un-novel observation, but since this thread has moved from discussing the oppression inherent to marriage to discussing the oppression inherent to household duty distribution, and how to put into practice emancipating oneself from that oppression, I thought it was worth observing that it&#039;s not the cleaning at issue. It&#039;s the house-cleaning.

And I was definitely trying to point out the flaw in the idea that if you buy something to clean your house, you&#039;re not participating in oppression, or you&#039;re doing so less than employing someone to clean your house. It probably IS better than employing someone, but not if you just consider that you&#039;ve upheld human dignity, done and dusted. Do you know who works in chip factories? Pe

I wasn&#039;t sticking up for dudes - the patriarchy sucks, and so does class oppression, and the interaction between the two is synergistic: women of lower socioeconomic position experience negative effects that far exceed the addition of class to gender oppression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, dear, I must have been unclear. I wasn&#8217;t saying that dude cleaners are comparably oppressed or somehow exempted from male privilege &#8211; I was trying to say that it&#8217;s not about the cleaning alone, it&#8217;s about the cleaning of A HOUSE. Women are further bound to the home, restricted, made captive, by the unquestioned assumption that home duties of all sorts are their domain. This is a profoundly un-novel observation, but since this thread has moved from discussing the oppression inherent to marriage to discussing the oppression inherent to household duty distribution, and how to put into practice emancipating oneself from that oppression, I thought it was worth observing that it&#8217;s not the cleaning at issue. It&#8217;s the house-cleaning.</p>
<p>And I was definitely trying to point out the flaw in the idea that if you buy something to clean your house, you&#8217;re not participating in oppression, or you&#8217;re doing so less than employing someone to clean your house. It probably IS better than employing someone, but not if you just consider that you&#8217;ve upheld human dignity, done and dusted. Do you know who works in chip factories? Pe</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t sticking up for dudes &#8211; the patriarchy sucks, and so does class oppression, and the interaction between the two is synergistic: women of lower socioeconomic position experience negative effects that far exceed the addition of class to gender oppression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168233</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168233</guid>
		<description>Jill -- doubtlessly. I&#039;m a terrible misquoter, and also somewhat of a word-dyslexic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill &#8212; doubtlessly. I&#8217;m a terrible misquoter, and also somewhat of a word-dyslexic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Svilova</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168230</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Svilova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168230</guid>
		<description>Yes, as Joy points out, reuse, recycle, and buy secondhand every time. Bring down capitalism as we know it!

Seriously. Because what we know of it is nothing to write home about, but plenty to blame about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as Joy points out, reuse, recycle, and buy secondhand every time. Bring down capitalism as we know it!</p>
<p>Seriously. Because what we know of it is nothing to write home about, but plenty to blame about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168227</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;    joy
August 11, 2010 at 3:03 pm

Class -is- important, Alexa, as many women are lower class. Lower class women aren’t just oppressed by the fact that they’re women — they’re oppressed doubly by the fact that they’re on the bottom of the shit pile, or as Jill once said, stuck in the slimy lower strata of this fetid capitalist swimming pool.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Surely I said &quot;strat&lt;em&gt;um&lt;/em&gt;&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>    joy<br />
August 11, 2010 at 3:03 pm</p>
<p>Class -is- important, Alexa, as many women are lower class. Lower class women aren’t just oppressed by the fact that they’re women — they’re oppressed doubly by the fact that they’re on the bottom of the shit pile, or as Jill once said, stuck in the slimy lower strata of this fetid capitalist swimming pool.</p></blockquote>
<p>Surely I said &#8220;strat<em>um</em>&#8220;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168216</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168216</guid>
		<description>Class -is- important, Alexa, as many women are lower class. Lower class women aren&#039;t just oppressed by the fact that they&#039;re women -- they&#039;re oppressed doubly by the fact that they&#039;re on the bottom of the shit pile, or as Jill once said, stuck in the slimy lower strata of this fetid capitalist swimming pool. 

Add race to this and you have a damn lot of people who would in fact argue that class is pretty fucking important. Intersectionality, whoa.

Talking about people in factories and dudes cleaning warehouses/airplane hangars/boats/whatever is a little bit derailing, though, as this entry is mostly about female housekeepers and the radical feminist implications of housework. 
It&#039;s kind of interesting that whenever a woman (who happened to be me this time, but it happened upthread a few times too) posted her actual experiences living at the intersection of lower class and female, the responses were, &quot;What about the people building Roombas (etc)??? Don&#039;t THEY have needs too?!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class -is- important, Alexa, as many women are lower class. Lower class women aren&#8217;t just oppressed by the fact that they&#8217;re women &#8212; they&#8217;re oppressed doubly by the fact that they&#8217;re on the bottom of the shit pile, or as Jill once said, stuck in the slimy lower strata of this fetid capitalist swimming pool. </p>
<p>Add race to this and you have a damn lot of people who would in fact argue that class is pretty fucking important. Intersectionality, whoa.</p>
<p>Talking about people in factories and dudes cleaning warehouses/airplane hangars/boats/whatever is a little bit derailing, though, as this entry is mostly about female housekeepers and the radical feminist implications of housework.<br />
It&#8217;s kind of interesting that whenever a woman (who happened to be me this time, but it happened upthread a few times too) posted her actual experiences living at the intersection of lower class and female, the responses were, &#8220;What about the people building Roombas (etc)??? Don&#8217;t THEY have needs too?!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168210</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168210</guid>
		<description>Buy secondhand stuff. That&#039;s a good piece of advice.

Someone still suffers to make said stuff (oh, and how they do), but at least when a person purchases a secondhand item they aren&#039;t DIRECTLY contributing to this suffering. 

Plus it keeps this item from going to the landfill.

Revolution is the way. I keep trying to foment something around this site, but get a profound response of &#039;meh&#039; from everyone other than, say, Jill. Like someone else said on here one time (I&#039;ve been reading the archives a lot to keep my militant flame alive), &quot;people only want to join the revolution if it doesn&#039;t inconvenience them too much.&quot;

People on the bottom, meanwhile, are pretty damn inconvenienced, and have been for a fucklong time. Let&#039;s get a move on this already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy secondhand stuff. That&#8217;s a good piece of advice.</p>
<p>Someone still suffers to make said stuff (oh, and how they do), but at least when a person purchases a secondhand item they aren&#8217;t DIRECTLY contributing to this suffering. </p>
<p>Plus it keeps this item from going to the landfill.</p>
<p>Revolution is the way. I keep trying to foment something around this site, but get a profound response of &#8216;meh&#8217; from everyone other than, say, Jill. Like someone else said on here one time (I&#8217;ve been reading the archives a lot to keep my militant flame alive), &#8220;people only want to join the revolution if it doesn&#8217;t inconvenience them too much.&#8221;</p>
<p>People on the bottom, meanwhile, are pretty damn inconvenienced, and have been for a fucklong time. Let&#8217;s get a move on this already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexa</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168206</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168206</guid>
		<description>Yay, a new poster who sticks up for dudes and swears she&#039;s not one. Ginger is one to watch, or get bored by. Your choice. 

I hate discussing things when you know the poster isn&#039;t feminist, but acts feminist while quietly crapping on everything to get past a mod policy. Some internet dwellers need lives.

Note: bringing up other more important oppressions on. A feminist blog is a sign the person hates feminism. Just a tip from captain obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, a new poster who sticks up for dudes and swears she&#8217;s not one. Ginger is one to watch, or get bored by. Your choice. </p>
<p>I hate discussing things when you know the poster isn&#8217;t feminist, but acts feminist while quietly crapping on everything to get past a mod policy. Some internet dwellers need lives.</p>
<p>Note: bringing up other more important oppressions on. A feminist blog is a sign the person hates feminism. Just a tip from captain obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ginger</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168188</link>
		<dc:creator>ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168188</guid>
		<description>Well, okay, since Joy revived this dead thread, I gotta point out: Roombas are a direct product of iRobot, developed by a DARPA-funded lab, and contain microchips manufactured in clean rooms by workers using hepatotoxic and teratogenic organic solvents. There ain&#039;t no such thing as a free lunch. Your Roomba is not only a product that damages workers (and their children!) but it was developed by the military-industrial complex. (The same branch thereof that brought you the Internet.) 

You can&#039;t win. If you pay someone to do something you don&#039;t want to do yourself, you&#039;re exerting class privilege. If you can afford to and do buy a machine to do that task, it&#039;s almost certain that someone manufactured it under conditions you wouldn&#039;t work under. That&#039;s class privilege, too.

On a related note - there are plenty of horrible places to clean that aren&#039;t residences, and plenty of dudes - underclass dudes, of course - clean them. It&#039;s just house-cleaning we see as an exclusively female domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, okay, since Joy revived this dead thread, I gotta point out: Roombas are a direct product of iRobot, developed by a DARPA-funded lab, and contain microchips manufactured in clean rooms by workers using hepatotoxic and teratogenic organic solvents. There ain&#8217;t no such thing as a free lunch. Your Roomba is not only a product that damages workers (and their children!) but it was developed by the military-industrial complex. (The same branch thereof that brought you the Internet.) </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t win. If you pay someone to do something you don&#8217;t want to do yourself, you&#8217;re exerting class privilege. If you can afford to and do buy a machine to do that task, it&#8217;s almost certain that someone manufactured it under conditions you wouldn&#8217;t work under. That&#8217;s class privilege, too.</p>
<p>On a related note &#8211; there are plenty of horrible places to clean that aren&#8217;t residences, and plenty of dudes &#8211; underclass dudes, of course &#8211; clean them. It&#8217;s just house-cleaning we see as an exclusively female domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168133</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/06/15/marriage2/#comment-168133</guid>
		<description>Humorous and hopefully illustrating story:

People upthread, long long ago, asked a.) to hear from people who actually clean house, and b.) wondered how many single women hire housekeepers. So here you have it.

I&#039;ve worked as a housekeeper before. I am a lower-class radical feminist anarchist with PTSD, and sometimes the freelance writing work just isn&#039;t enough to pay rent. Can&#039;t have honky daddy (who ran out on my mom when I was a baby) or mommy (who&#039;s lower class herself) bail my ass out of trouble, so I have to do something to keep from being homeless.

It&#039;s either cleaning floors or sucking dicks. Let me let you in on a secret: I resent both the people whose dicks I&#039;ve sucked and the people whose floors I&#039;ve cleaned (the elderly and disabled aside) -- albeit for different reasons.

It&#039;s nice having money to pay rent, cover basic necessities, etc. That&#039;s true. Thank you rich honky ladies for providing some of us with your (or your Nigel&#039;s) income in exchange for scrubbing up your well-heeled baby&#039;s puke! I&#039;m sure that money was richly earned and whatnot.

You do what you got to do to get by, but abolishment of capitalism, downsizing of lifestyles, making Nigel do it, etc., is the way to go. Really. 

Meanwhile, I recently posted an ad for a woman-owned, woman-run cleaning business. If I&#039;m gonna do this again, I want to clean for women. Single women, partnered lesbians, disabled women, elderly women, I just want to clean for women. My ad makes this abundantly clear: I am a housecleaner who wishes to clean house for women.

I&#039;ve received no responses thus far. Except from pornsick dudes asking me to pick up after their fuckforsaken messes and blow them while I&#039;m at it. They&#039;ll pay me $20 an hour.

That should clear up any lingering confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humorous and hopefully illustrating story:</p>
<p>People upthread, long long ago, asked a.) to hear from people who actually clean house, and b.) wondered how many single women hire housekeepers. So here you have it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve worked as a housekeeper before. I am a lower-class radical feminist anarchist with PTSD, and sometimes the freelance writing work just isn&#8217;t enough to pay rent. Can&#8217;t have honky daddy (who ran out on my mom when I was a baby) or mommy (who&#8217;s lower class herself) bail my ass out of trouble, so I have to do something to keep from being homeless.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s either cleaning floors or sucking dicks. Let me let you in on a secret: I resent both the people whose dicks I&#8217;ve sucked and the people whose floors I&#8217;ve cleaned (the elderly and disabled aside) &#8212; albeit for different reasons.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice having money to pay rent, cover basic necessities, etc. That&#8217;s true. Thank you rich honky ladies for providing some of us with your (or your Nigel&#8217;s) income in exchange for scrubbing up your well-heeled baby&#8217;s puke! I&#8217;m sure that money was richly earned and whatnot.</p>
<p>You do what you got to do to get by, but abolishment of capitalism, downsizing of lifestyles, making Nigel do it, etc., is the way to go. Really. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, I recently posted an ad for a woman-owned, woman-run cleaning business. If I&#8217;m gonna do this again, I want to clean for women. Single women, partnered lesbians, disabled women, elderly women, I just want to clean for women. My ad makes this abundantly clear: I am a housecleaner who wishes to clean house for women.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve received no responses thus far. Except from pornsick dudes asking me to pick up after their fuckforsaken messes and blow them while I&#8217;m at it. They&#8217;ll pay me $20 an hour.</p>
<p>That should clear up any lingering confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

