<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AntifeministWatch 2007: Ana Marie Cox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Female Bloggers Discuss Obama&#8217;s &#8216;Register Women For The Draft&#8217; Remark &#124; Feminist Critics</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-132012</link>
		<dc:creator>Female Bloggers Discuss Obama&#8217;s &#8216;Register Women For The Draft&#8217; Remark &#124; Feminist Critics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 07:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-132012</guid>
		<description>[...] feminism&#8217;s second and third waves. She has come under fire from some feminists, including Twisty Faster at IBTP who apparently thought it damning to post without comment something Cox once wrote: &#8220;Strident [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] feminism&#8217;s second and third waves. She has come under fire from some feminists, including Twisty Faster at IBTP who apparently thought it damning to post without comment something Cox once wrote: &#8220;Strident [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Female Bloggers Discuss Obama&#8217;s &#8216;Draft Women&#8217; Remark &#124; Feminist Critics</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-131911</link>
		<dc:creator>Female Bloggers Discuss Obama&#8217;s &#8216;Draft Women&#8217; Remark &#124; Feminist Critics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 04:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-131911</guid>
		<description>[...] feminism&#8217;s second and third waves. She has come under fire from some feminists, including Twisty Faster at IBTP who apparently thought it damning to post without comment something Cox once wrote: &#8220;Strident [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] feminism&#8217;s second and third waves. She has come under fire from some feminists, including Twisty Faster at IBTP who apparently thought it damning to post without comment something Cox once wrote: &#8220;Strident [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmonq</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-90609</link>
		<dc:creator>madmonq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-90609</guid>
		<description>The McLaughlin Group is still on the air?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McLaughlin Group is still on the air?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-90470</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-90470</guid>
		<description>&quot;parlaying her pottymouthed bloggerdom into a meteoric rise to Professional Token Edgy Hot Chick on the pundit circuit&quot;

Now that is comedy gold, GOLD I tell ya. I have no room in my head for the Wonkette. Or most of the talk shows, for that matter. Thanks for watching, so I don&#039;t have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;parlaying her pottymouthed bloggerdom into a meteoric rise to Professional Token Edgy Hot Chick on the pundit circuit&#8221;</p>
<p>Now that is comedy gold, GOLD I tell ya. I have no room in my head for the Wonkette. Or most of the talk shows, for that matter. Thanks for watching, so I don&#8217;t have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raincloud</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-89895</link>
		<dc:creator>Raincloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-89895</guid>
		<description>If you want to find some real anti feminists try this lot of religious nut cases. They are some sort of baptists and they have some weird views on everything
http://handsacrossoceanministry.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to find some real anti feminists try this lot of religious nut cases. They are some sort of baptists and they have some weird views on everything<br />
<a href="http://handsacrossoceanministry.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://handsacrossoceanministry.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe &#187; Why blame feminism for this?</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-89584</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe &#187; Why blame feminism for this?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-89584</guid>
		<description>[...] last book was also reviewed by a lightweight, Ana Marie Cox, with a connection to butt sex and an apparent axe to grind about feminism. Frankly, I think the modus operandi of the NYTBR is to discredit Pollitt and feminism by treating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last book was also reviewed by a lightweight, Ana Marie Cox, with a connection to butt sex and an apparent axe to grind about feminism. Frankly, I think the modus operandi of the NYTBR is to discredit Pollitt and feminism by treating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Loves Adolf</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-89105</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Loves Adolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-89105</guid>
		<description>Indeed, Bill O&#039;Reilly was &quot;interviewing&quot; the illegitimately self-proclaimed &quot;feminist,&quot; Monica Crowley, concerning the new PETA ad campaign. Dear Monica delivered a supercilious chuckle along with her comments that the ads, which featured a nude Alicia Silverstone with strategically-placed arms and legs broadcasting the wonders of vegan life, were clearly not exploiting women since numerous forms of media display frontal male nudity. Bill O&#039;Reilly sure knows how to fill his 2 hour slot with self-respecting women. Puke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Bill O&#8217;Reilly was &#8220;interviewing&#8221; the illegitimately self-proclaimed &#8220;feminist,&#8221; Monica Crowley, concerning the new PETA ad campaign. Dear Monica delivered a supercilious chuckle along with her comments that the ads, which featured a nude Alicia Silverstone with strategically-placed arms and legs broadcasting the wonders of vegan life, were clearly not exploiting women since numerous forms of media display frontal male nudity. Bill O&#8217;Reilly sure knows how to fill his 2 hour slot with self-respecting women. Puke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blondie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-87460</link>
		<dc:creator>blondie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-87460</guid>
		<description>Speaking of gross old male media, last night Bill O&#039;Reilly was &quot;interviewing&quot; two hot younger women about various current event-ish matters and concluded by betting them &quot;dinner&quot; that he was right about something.  Yee-uck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of gross old male media, last night Bill O&#8217;Reilly was &#8220;interviewing&#8221; two hot younger women about various current event-ish matters and concluded by betting them &#8220;dinner&#8221; that he was right about something.  Yee-uck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-87410</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-87410</guid>
		<description>Yeah, us ugly old feminist hags are a bunch of witches, aren&#039;t we?  Hence the common usage of the phrase, &quot;I&#039;m not a feminist, but-&quot; where the young cutie proceeds to say something which might be considered feminist.  

I&#039;m sure the dudes prefer having a &quot;bimbo&quot; who makes them seem smart, over a woman with brains.

I&#039;m with Orange - can&#039;t understand anything they say once they all start yelling at once.  Bill Moyers is a very rare gem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, us ugly old feminist hags are a bunch of witches, aren&#8217;t we?  Hence the common usage of the phrase, &#8220;I&#8217;m not a feminist, but-&#8221; where the young cutie proceeds to say something which might be considered feminist.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the dudes prefer having a &#8220;bimbo&#8221; who makes them seem smart, over a woman with brains.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Orange &#8211; can&#8217;t understand anything they say once they all start yelling at once.  Bill Moyers is a very rare gem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lymie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-87210</link>
		<dc:creator>lymie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2007/09/01/antifeministwatch-2007-ana-marie-cox/#comment-87210</guid>
		<description>Thank you!  She is such a creep.  Clueless, not curious. GAH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!  She is such a creep.  Clueless, not curious. GAH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

