<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Stanley</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: PhysioProf</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-106128</link>
		<author>PhysioProf</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-106128</guid>
		<description>What a pretty horse! Glad you're back to regular blaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a pretty horse! Glad you&#8217;re back to regular blaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoenixRising</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105803</link>
		<author>PhoenixRising</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105803</guid>
		<description>B Dagger, I would be most pleased to produce such photos.

My family will vacate in rural (pronounced, natch, 'rule') Travis County within weeks for our annual spring fling with my best bud and my kid's not-quite-cousins.

My wife bakes horse treats for which anything on four hooves will behave exactly to spec. Well, not strictly 'anything', as there was the Shetland to whom we referred as 'BBQ' in honor of my most common impulse toward it, but that's another story. Stanley could not be that obstreperous.

Need I suggest more specifically?

Oh, and as to the NYRB: I once sold a sidebar to the NYT Mag. After the appropriate editorial condescension had been glazed atop, I barely recognized the damn thing. 

You're just lucky she didn't pull the Lawn Jockey post while simultaneously outing Tidy to the riding community as a Person Whose Sister Blogs That They're Racist.

(It has been my experience that telling them they are racist straight to their pasty white sunburned faces does not produce results either, so whatever they say, you may as well blog about them.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B Dagger, I would be most pleased to produce such photos.</p>
<p>My family will vacate in rural (pronounced, natch, &#8216;rule&#8217;) Travis County within weeks for our annual spring fling with my best bud and my kid&#8217;s not-quite-cousins.</p>
<p>My wife bakes horse treats for which anything on four hooves will behave exactly to spec. Well, not strictly &#8216;anything&#8217;, as there was the Shetland to whom we referred as &#8216;BBQ&#8217; in honor of my most common impulse toward it, but that&#8217;s another story. Stanley could not be that obstreperous.</p>
<p>Need I suggest more specifically?</p>
<p>Oh, and as to the NYRB: I once sold a sidebar to the NYT Mag. After the appropriate editorial condescension had been glazed atop, I barely recognized the damn thing. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re just lucky she didn&#8217;t pull the Lawn Jockey post while simultaneously outing Tidy to the riding community as a Person Whose Sister Blogs That They&#8217;re Racist.</p>
<p>(It has been my experience that telling them they are racist straight to their pasty white sunburned faces does not produce results either, so whatever they say, you may as well blog about them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105418</link>
		<author>Lauren</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105418</guid>
		<description>Too bad about Sarah Boxer. Many of us academic henchmen are thrilled to write about the blogosphere. I'm writing a master's thesis on feminist blogs and could not be more enthusiastic and gung-ho to champion their work -- not in spite of their blogging medium, but often because of it. The recent Twisty post on bacon, where blog comments lead to increased awareness/activism in social issues, is a perfect example. If it's any consolation, the "mustiness" of old-school lit culture is certainly passing; new media studies and digital rhetoric are where it's at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad about Sarah Boxer. Many of us academic henchmen are thrilled to write about the blogosphere. I&#8217;m writing a master&#8217;s thesis on feminist blogs and could not be more enthusiastic and gung-ho to champion their work &#8212; not in spite of their blogging medium, but often because of it. The recent Twisty post on bacon, where blog comments lead to increased awareness/activism in social issues, is a perfect example. If it&#8217;s any consolation, the &#8220;mustiness&#8221; of old-school lit culture is certainly passing; new media studies and digital rhetoric are where it&#8217;s at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deja pseu</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105364</link>
		<author>deja pseu</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105364</guid>
		<description>Stanley is quite the handsome fellow.  Congratulations and Happy Trails!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanley is quite the handsome fellow.  Congratulations and Happy Trails!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paris</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105352</link>
		<author>Paris</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105352</guid>
		<description>Holy crap! Not only is my favorite blogger back, but you have deigned to add the only topic whose presense I miss as a chaser to the erudition I seek in the blogsphere: pony blogging.

Fantastic.


(I know Stanley's too tall to be a pony. Y'all can shut up now.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap! Not only is my favorite blogger back, but you have deigned to add the only topic whose presense I miss as a chaser to the erudition I seek in the blogsphere: pony blogging.</p>
<p>Fantastic.</p>
<p>(I know Stanley&#8217;s too tall to be a pony. Y&#8217;all can shut up now.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the baboon</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105251</link>
		<author>the baboon</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105251</guid>
		<description>She had horses who danced in their mothers' arms.
She had horses who thought they were the sun and their bodies shone and burned like stars.
She had horses who waltzed nightly on the moon.
She had horses who were much too shy, and kept quiet in stalls of their own making.

She had some horses.

She had horses who liked Creek Stomp Dance songs.
She had horses who cried in their beer.
She had horses who spit at male queens who made them afraid of themselves.
She had horses who said they weren't afraid.
She had horses who lied.
She had horses who told the truth, who were stripped bare of their tongues.

She had some horses.

She had horses who called themselves, "horse."
She had horses who called themselves, "spirit." and kept their voices secret and to themselves.
She had horses who had no names.
She had horses who had books of names.

She had some horses. 

Yay for Joy Harjo! Yay for Twisty posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She had horses who danced in their mothers&#8217; arms.<br />
She had horses who thought they were the sun and their bodies shone and burned like stars.<br />
She had horses who waltzed nightly on the moon.<br />
She had horses who were much too shy, and kept quiet in stalls of their own making.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses who liked Creek Stomp Dance songs.<br />
She had horses who cried in their beer.<br />
She had horses who spit at male queens who made them afraid of themselves.<br />
She had horses who said they weren&#8217;t afraid.<br />
She had horses who lied.<br />
She had horses who told the truth, who were stripped bare of their tongues.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses who called themselves, &#8220;horse.&#8221;<br />
She had horses who called themselves, &#8220;spirit.&#8221; and kept their voices secret and to themselves.<br />
She had horses who had no names.<br />
She had horses who had books of names.</p>
<p>She had some horses. </p>
<p>Yay for Joy Harjo! Yay for Twisty posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yankeetransferred</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105126</link>
		<author>yankeetransferred</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-105126</guid>
		<description>WHOAH, STANLEY!!!!  Twisty's back in town!  You've been missed, and your re-entry posts are brilliant.  The Valentine's day post is suitable for framing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHOAH, STANLEY!!!!  Twisty&#8217;s back in town!  You&#8217;ve been missed, and your re-entry posts are brilliant.  The Valentine&#8217;s day post is suitable for framing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hattie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-104848</link>
		<author>Hattie</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-104848</guid>
		<description>I actually thought this was a good piece on blogging. And as we all know Lee Siegel is God.
And so are you, Twisty. And your horse is a God horse.
I read the other articles in the NYRB, too. I subscribe to it, believe it or not. Yes. It is known of and read, at least by me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually thought this was a good piece on blogging. And as we all know Lee Siegel is God.<br />
And so are you, Twisty. And your horse is a God horse.<br />
I read the other articles in the NYRB, too. I subscribe to it, believe it or not. Yes. It is known of and read, at least by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hattie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-104828</link>
		<author>Hattie</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-104828</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know anything any more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know anything any more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-104821</link>
		<author>Elaine Vigneault</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/12/more-stanley/#comment-104821</guid>
		<description>Don't be too hard on B&#38;N workers. They earn barely more than minimum wage and they're book SELLERS, after all, not necessarily book lovers or book readers. In fact, it's in their name: Barnes &#38; Noble Booksellers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be too hard on B&amp;N workers. They earn barely more than minimum wage and they&#8217;re book SELLERS, after all, not necessarily book lovers or book readers. In fact, it&#8217;s in their name: Barnes &amp; Noble Booksellers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
