<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanley: now with even more invective</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: amy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-130420</link>
		<author>amy</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-130420</guid>
		<description>This shit will blow your mind:
http://www.prphotos.com/store/category.cgi?category=search&#38;query=^events_efts.sql&#38;searchtype=efts&#38;index=misc2&#38;q2=PETA Animal Rights Group Stages a Mothers Day Demonstration at Covent Garden in London on February 28, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This shit will blow your mind:<br />
<a href="http://www.prphotos.com/store/category.cgi?category=search&amp;query=" rel="nofollow">http://www.prphotos.com/store/category.cgi?category=search&amp;query=</a>^events_efts.sql&amp;searchtype=efts&amp;index=misc2&amp;q2=PETA Animal Rights Group Stages a Mothers Day Demonstration at Covent Garden in London on February 28, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegan Feminism &#60; fragmente</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-124580</link>
		<author>Vegan Feminism &#60; fragmente</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 10:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-124580</guid>
		<description>[...] Stanley: now with even more invective at I Blame The Patriarchy   Post a comment &#124; Trackback [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Stanley: now with even more invective at I Blame The Patriarchy   Post a comment | Trackback [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I think I found a new subhead for my other blog &#171; Wolf in Sheep&#8217;s Clothing</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-109141</link>
		<author>I think I found a new subhead for my other blog &#171; Wolf in Sheep&#8217;s Clothing</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-109141</guid>
		<description>[...] Lopate thought this blurb sounded &#8220;like a personal ad.&#8221; I&#8217;d like to point out that personal ads are generally written in the first person perspective, rather than from the pimps-eye-view. Personal ads also frequently include the author&#8217;s wants in addition to hir selling points and special features. I, personally, have never written an ad seductively organized around comparing myself to inanimate edibles. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Lopate thought this blurb sounded &#8220;like a personal ad.&#8221; I&#8217;d like to point out that personal ads are generally written in the first person perspective, rather than from the pimps-eye-view. Personal ads also frequently include the author&#8217;s wants in addition to hir selling points and special features. I, personally, have never written an ad seductively organized around comparing myself to inanimate edibles. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Body Impolitic - Blog Archive - &#187; Using Sex Work Politics to Preserve Animal Rights (and Vice Versa?) - Laurie Toby Edison: Photographer</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-109084</link>
		<author>Body Impolitic - Blog Archive - &#187; Using Sex Work Politics to Preserve Animal Rights (and Vice Versa?) - Laurie Toby Edison: Photographer</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-109084</guid>
		<description>[...] this whole campaign wasn&#8217;t infuriating enough, Twisty at I Blame the Patriarchy draws our attention to Gary Francone at Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach, making a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] this whole campaign wasn&#8217;t infuriating enough, Twisty at I Blame the Patriarchy draws our attention to Gary Francone at Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach, making a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Ray</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108821</link>
		<author>Virginia Ray</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108821</guid>
		<description>Twisty this is near you 

http://www.boggycreekfarm.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twisty this is near you </p>
<p><a href="http://www.boggycreekfarm.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boggycreekfarm.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Ray</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108657</link>
		<author>Virginia Ray</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108657</guid>
		<description>and here are low cost recipies

http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2006issue2/vj2006issue2mealplans.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and here are low cost recipies</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2006issue2/vj2006issue2mealplans.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2006issue2/vj2006issue2mealplans.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Ray</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108653</link>
		<author>Virginia Ray</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108653</guid>
		<description>Twisty,

Look what I found - meal delivery for vegans 

http://www.hungry-vegan.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twisty,</p>
<p>Look what I found - meal delivery for vegans </p>
<p><a href="http://www.hungry-vegan.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hungry-vegan.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezebella</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108480</link>
		<author>Jezebella</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108480</guid>
		<description>Look, so we've got a Cat Solution, but what the hell are the dogs going to eat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, so we&#8217;ve got a Cat Solution, but what the hell are the dogs going to eat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanami</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108385</link>
		<author>Nanami</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108385</guid>
		<description>Fitting finale for this blog, which exposes just how much you and especially your "followers" (bleh :0) had in common with struggle for womens equality (nothing). You just enjoy wallowing in misery and finding various flaws in the surrounding reality.
Meanwhile the real feminists get on with their lives making equality a fact by being successful in various careers. And I can't care less if they eat meat, support war, or vote republican. All this per se has nothing to do with feminism.
It's a pity that the feminist presence on the internet is limited  to either your likes or the "girly" women studies graduate type that you call "fun feminists". I guess normal people are too busy actually doing their own things to blog about something like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitting finale for this blog, which exposes just how much you and especially your &#8220;followers&#8221; (bleh :0) had in common with struggle for womens equality (nothing). You just enjoy wallowing in misery and finding various flaws in the surrounding reality.<br />
Meanwhile the real feminists get on with their lives making equality a fact by being successful in various careers. And I can&#8217;t care less if they eat meat, support war, or vote republican. All this per se has nothing to do with feminism.<br />
It&#8217;s a pity that the feminist presence on the internet is limited  to either your likes or the &#8220;girly&#8221; women studies graduate type that you call &#8220;fun feminists&#8221;. I guess normal people are too busy actually doing their own things to blog about something like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddy</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108211</link>
		<author>maddy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/02/22/stanley-now-with-even-more-invective/#comment-108211</guid>
		<description>Well, there's revolution - which calls for a stabilised ecosystem in which no animal is exploited by humans (but the occasional spear and spit-roast is still okay because minimal harvesting makes no difference to anyone except that one animal, who was probably eating food that could better have been shared out among five skinny others).
And then there's the transition there (can you imagine?)

Or there's status quo - modified to place maximum emphasis on sustainability.
This, it seems to me, is what North is talking about.

It's no different to anyone who does their best in the world we already live in.  From the starting point where we are now.
Virginia Ray: I know a fair bit about animal husbandry, a lot about how farm animals live, a little about how they are slaughtered and get to the consumer.
For many, many grazing animals across the world, the 'endless summer pasture' is no lie at all (especially in a mild climate where winter housing can be minimal).
All farm animals are owned (except for the few mustered from the wild for slaughter) and in that sense, oppressed.  But not all suffer, or need suffer.
There is work yet to do to ensure the welfare of our food - and I'd rather correct emphasis was placed on having primary producers as 'benevolent oppressors' - that is, farming with minimal impact - than see misinformation and scare tactics and shaming used to discourage consuming the end products.

Now that was a heck of a long piece of spam.  Image of grazing cow in link above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s revolution - which calls for a stabilised ecosystem in which no animal is exploited by humans (but the occasional spear and spit-roast is still okay because minimal harvesting makes no difference to anyone except that one animal, who was probably eating food that could better have been shared out among five skinny others).<br />
And then there&#8217;s the transition there (can you imagine?)</p>
<p>Or there&#8217;s status quo - modified to place maximum emphasis on sustainability.<br />
This, it seems to me, is what North is talking about.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no different to anyone who does their best in the world we already live in.  From the starting point where we are now.<br />
Virginia Ray: I know a fair bit about animal husbandry, a lot about how farm animals live, a little about how they are slaughtered and get to the consumer.<br />
For many, many grazing animals across the world, the &#8216;endless summer pasture&#8217; is no lie at all (especially in a mild climate where winter housing can be minimal).<br />
All farm animals are owned (except for the few mustered from the wild for slaughter) and in that sense, oppressed.  But not all suffer, or need suffer.<br />
There is work yet to do to ensure the welfare of our food - and I&#8217;d rather correct emphasis was placed on having primary producers as &#8216;benevolent oppressors&#8217; - that is, farming with minimal impact - than see misinformation and scare tactics and shaming used to discourage consuming the end products.</p>
<p>Now that was a heck of a long piece of spam.  Image of grazing cow in link above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
