<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ex-journalist blames patriarchy</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: the fshk blog &#187; quickies: all over the place edition</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110455</link>
		<author>the fshk blog &#187; quickies: all over the place edition</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110455</guid>
		<description>[...] Journalists perpetuate the she was asking for it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Journalists perpetuate the she was asking for it [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbalagan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110349</link>
		<author>bigbalagan</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110349</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there is any way to have an offset program for one's misogynist footprint, like they are trying to do for carbon?  I think some Twisty-out-of-the-box would be appropriate on that one.

To you comments in comments, I don't know whether one would call the oppression of women or of children the more painful and critical issue in the world---not that one needs to commensurate about multiple disasters, where, after all, both abused populations are huge---but I think it is clear that of the two, there is even less discussion/analysis/identification of the blatant and universal oppression of children than of women. These oppressions share some key features, such as the default positions of chattel ownership by the male overlords, and perhaps (in the case of children) by the adult overlords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there is any way to have an offset program for one&#8217;s misogynist footprint, like they are trying to do for carbon?  I think some Twisty-out-of-the-box would be appropriate on that one.</p>
<p>To you comments in comments, I don&#8217;t know whether one would call the oppression of women or of children the more painful and critical issue in the world&#8212;not that one needs to commensurate about multiple disasters, where, after all, both abused populations are huge&#8212;but I think it is clear that of the two, there is even less discussion/analysis/identification of the blatant and universal oppression of children than of women. These oppressions share some key features, such as the default positions of chattel ownership by the male overlords, and perhaps (in the case of children) by the adult overlords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110289</link>
		<author>Twisty</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110289</guid>
		<description>In a patriarchy, nobody has less agency than a female child. In Twisty version of post-patriarchy, 13 year old kids could ditch their parents whether they are abused or not. Because this wacky notion that kids are  more or less the property of their families has got to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a patriarchy, nobody has less agency than a female child. In Twisty version of post-patriarchy, 13 year old kids could ditch their parents whether they are abused or not. Because this wacky notion that kids are  more or less the property of their families has got to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serafina</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110288</link>
		<author>Serafina</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110288</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As though a 13-year-old female kid has any kind of agency whatsoever.&lt;/i&gt;

Sure she does. That's why I'm for giving her the right to an abortion and to leave her parents' house freely if she is abused, even if there's no proof of that abuse. 

I bring this up because runaway teens are a big source of fodder for the sex industry, and changing the way we think of teen girls and their rights and their agency would be a good start to altering this trend. We could give them options besides "live on the streets or go back to your parents unless you have actual broken bones, in which case we'll put you in foster care."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As though a 13-year-old female kid has any kind of agency whatsoever.</i></p>
<p>Sure she does. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m for giving her the right to an abortion and to leave her parents&#8217; house freely if she is abused, even if there&#8217;s no proof of that abuse. </p>
<p>I bring this up because runaway teens are a big source of fodder for the sex industry, and changing the way we think of teen girls and their rights and their agency would be a good start to altering this trend. We could give them options besides &#8220;live on the streets or go back to your parents unless you have actual broken bones, in which case we&#8217;ll put you in foster care.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invisible hussein</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110216</link>
		<author>invisible hussein</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110216</guid>
		<description>Yes, well.  

“She got too drunk at the bar.”
“She was a whore to begin with.”
“She didn’t fight back hard enough; she must have really wanted it.”
“She’s a lying bitch out to totally screw that innocent dude.”
“What did she expect, with those boobs, walking alone at night, walking alone period, walking alone without an assault cannon, 8 bodyguards and a pack of Dobermans?”

Please, when I finally understood that men talked, I began to condemn them.

Too inflamatory?  Who says?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, well.  </p>
<p>“She got too drunk at the bar.”<br />
“She was a whore to begin with.”<br />
“She didn’t fight back hard enough; she must have really wanted it.”<br />
“She’s a lying bitch out to totally screw that innocent dude.”<br />
“What did she expect, with those boobs, walking alone at night, walking alone period, walking alone without an assault cannon, 8 bodyguards and a pack of Dobermans?”</p>
<p>Please, when I finally understood that men talked, I began to condemn them.</p>
<p>Too inflamatory?  Who says?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chingona</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110183</link>
		<author>chingona</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110183</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this. At the risk of outing myself, I am a member of the much-maligned mainstream media, so I know a bit about the subject. Police reporters often (though not always) are among the most inexperienced reporters in the newsroom, and they spend a lot of time around police, causing them to absorb a lot of attitudes from them (not to mention what they bring to the job from our general culture, which sometimes means a low opinion of women). Being inexperienced, they tend to report/repeat stuff in police jargon or exactly as it was said to them without putting much critical thought into it. One headline at my own paper that outraged me and a lot of other people who work here referred to "sexually motivated crimes." Now, to me, a sexually motivated crime would someone holding up a liquor store to get money for his Viagra. Someone hiding in the shadows and jumping out and exposing himself and grabbing women by their crotches and breasts (which was what was occuring) is a sex crime, or heaven forbid, a sexual assault. Calling it sexually motivated perpetuates this reprehensible and false idea that guys do this because they are just too hot and bothered to help themselves. And this is an institutional problem. Newbies make lots of mistakes, but a lot of them don't make it in the paper. Editors don't always see these things as problems because they just don't see them. They don't get it. In the media, we have a huge responsibility, but we're only as good or as bad as the people that work here, and like most of society, a lot of us just don't get it.

What to do? People need to let newspapers know what bothers them about how rape is presented in the paper and why. Don't just contact the reporter. If the newspaper has a public editor or reader advocate, get in touch with them. Ask for a meeting with the top editors. Write a letter to the editor. Your paper probably will not reform itself overnight, but you may get rule changes in the style book, which dictates the language newspapers use for certain situations, and you may get new directions given to copy editors to watch for certain language that is particularly common and problematic. It's not much, but it's a start. 

(I'm not suggesting you cannot be pissed off until you take these steps, just saying that newspapers don't exist in a vacuum and can be subject to community pressure, particularly if it comes from a respected group that works with victims of sexual assault or domestic violence, rather than an individual who can be dismissed as overly sensitive.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this. At the risk of outing myself, I am a member of the much-maligned mainstream media, so I know a bit about the subject. Police reporters often (though not always) are among the most inexperienced reporters in the newsroom, and they spend a lot of time around police, causing them to absorb a lot of attitudes from them (not to mention what they bring to the job from our general culture, which sometimes means a low opinion of women). Being inexperienced, they tend to report/repeat stuff in police jargon or exactly as it was said to them without putting much critical thought into it. One headline at my own paper that outraged me and a lot of other people who work here referred to &#8220;sexually motivated crimes.&#8221; Now, to me, a sexually motivated crime would someone holding up a liquor store to get money for his Viagra. Someone hiding in the shadows and jumping out and exposing himself and grabbing women by their crotches and breasts (which was what was occuring) is a sex crime, or heaven forbid, a sexual assault. Calling it sexually motivated perpetuates this reprehensible and false idea that guys do this because they are just too hot and bothered to help themselves. And this is an institutional problem. Newbies make lots of mistakes, but a lot of them don&#8217;t make it in the paper. Editors don&#8217;t always see these things as problems because they just don&#8217;t see them. They don&#8217;t get it. In the media, we have a huge responsibility, but we&#8217;re only as good or as bad as the people that work here, and like most of society, a lot of us just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>What to do? People need to let newspapers know what bothers them about how rape is presented in the paper and why. Don&#8217;t just contact the reporter. If the newspaper has a public editor or reader advocate, get in touch with them. Ask for a meeting with the top editors. Write a letter to the editor. Your paper probably will not reform itself overnight, but you may get rule changes in the style book, which dictates the language newspapers use for certain situations, and you may get new directions given to copy editors to watch for certain language that is particularly common and problematic. It&#8217;s not much, but it&#8217;s a start. </p>
<p>(I&#8217;m not suggesting you cannot be pissed off until you take these steps, just saying that newspapers don&#8217;t exist in a vacuum and can be subject to community pressure, particularly if it comes from a respected group that works with victims of sexual assault or domestic violence, rather than an individual who can be dismissed as overly sensitive.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitch, Esquire</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110160</link>
		<author>Bitch, Esquire</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110160</guid>
		<description>Hey, Badkitty, check out the Judicial Language Project at New England School of Law.  They analyze judicial opinions for inappropriate language (like "had sex" with a 7yo) and suggest alternatives.  Useful ammo for editorials, IMO.

It's at http://www.nesl.edu/clsr/projects/SDVP/svnews/jlp/public/

Disclosure:  I am an alum of the school and currently work there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Badkitty, check out the Judicial Language Project at New England School of Law.  They analyze judicial opinions for inappropriate language (like &#8220;had sex&#8221; with a 7yo) and suggest alternatives.  Useful ammo for editorials, IMO.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s at <a href="http://www.nesl.edu/clsr/projects/SDVP/svnews/jlp/public/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nesl.edu/clsr/projects/SDVP/svnews/jlp/public/</a></p>
<p>Disclosure:  I am an alum of the school and currently work there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slythwolf</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110088</link>
		<author>slythwolf</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110088</guid>
		<description>Thank you for what you do, BadKitty. Thank you so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for what you do, BadKitty. Thank you so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mearl</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110062</link>
		<author>mearl</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110062</guid>
		<description>Hurrah for my awesome university and its awesome prof!!(Sorry, Winnipeg-pride neurological takeover.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurrah for my awesome university and its awesome prof!!(Sorry, Winnipeg-pride neurological takeover.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceejay1968</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110053</link>
		<author>ceejay1968</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/17/ex-journalist-blames-patriarchy/#comment-110053</guid>
		<description>I just had to mention your side comment about the girls' sports teams being called "Lady" whatevers.  Here, the boys' team at my daughter's school is the "Wildcats."  The girls' team is the "Lady Cats."

I thought I was going to explode when I first found that out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had to mention your side comment about the girls&#8217; sports teams being called &#8220;Lady&#8221; whatevers.  Here, the boys&#8217; team at my daughter&#8217;s school is the &#8220;Wildcats.&#8221;  The girls&#8217; team is the &#8220;Lady Cats.&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought I was going to explode when I first found that out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
