<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bouteilian theory: a primer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauredhel</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-113327</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauredhel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-113327</guid>
		<description>Could people please be spoiler-aware? We don&#039;t all get the episodes at the same time. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could people please be spoiler-aware? We don&#8217;t all get the episodes at the same time. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-113282</link>
		<dc:creator>Lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-113282</guid>
		<description>You know Denelian I am also of the big-boobed clan of females.  I spent many years living among the mountains of Arizona, but then again big boobage runs in my family, so I dunno if the mountains had to do with it :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Denelian I am also of the big-boobed clan of females.  I spent many years living among the mountains of Arizona, but then again big boobage runs in my family, so I dunno if the mountains had to do with it :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denelian</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-113108</link>
		<dc:creator>denelian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 04:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-113108</guid>
		<description>so... just to stake that freudian vampire all the way down...

i grew up in California. in the Sierra Nevadas. to me, mountains have ALWAYS been breasts. maybe because i was raised pagan, or maybe because we all suffer from BBS (Big Breast Syndrom. yes, i would kill for a reduction. sigh). so while some people looked around and saw penises, i saw breasts, and tits, and boobs...

very femi-centric of me, i guess. what can i say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so&#8230; just to stake that freudian vampire all the way down&#8230;</p>
<p>i grew up in California. in the Sierra Nevadas. to me, mountains have ALWAYS been breasts. maybe because i was raised pagan, or maybe because we all suffer from BBS (Big Breast Syndrom. yes, i would kill for a reduction. sigh). so while some people looked around and saw penises, i saw breasts, and tits, and boobs&#8230;</p>
<p>very femi-centric of me, i guess. what can i say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-113081</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-113081</guid>
		<description>Trying not to derail the conversation, but I just got way too excited when I found reference to Torchwood on IBTP. It&#039;s almost as good as when I managed to link together Tegan and Sara with Doctor Who. Slightly more to the point, I can&#039;t think of a better secret organization to be under a very vulva shaped structure - although if they&#039;re going to keep having people get taken hostage, next time can it please be someone besides Gwen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying not to derail the conversation, but I just got way too excited when I found reference to Torchwood on IBTP. It&#8217;s almost as good as when I managed to link together Tegan and Sara with Doctor Who. Slightly more to the point, I can&#8217;t think of a better secret organization to be under a very vulva shaped structure &#8211; although if they&#8217;re going to keep having people get taken hostage, next time can it please be someone besides Gwen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa MB</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112539</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112539</guid>
		<description>I have long theorized that men&#039;s neckties are phallic symbols, and now I&#039;m afraid that my musings might be overly inspired by the patriarchy.

But hear me out.  Ties are surely non-functional, so they must exist mostly as symbols.  I think businessmen wear them as indicators of their manhood, like a fashion swordfight. 

Tie styles even adapt to reflect and counter developments in society.  In the 1970s, when women&#039;s &quot;lib&quot; was taking hold, men&#039;s ties were super wide and the knots mighty thick.  In the 80s, as being gay and/or androgynous was starting to seem hip, thin ties took their brief turn in the spotlight. Right now, we&#039;re back to standard-sized ties, but I bet a president Hillary Clinton would cause a return to wide ties. 

I don&#039;t know about bowties, but I&#039;m sure there&#039;s some explanation that would fit in with my theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long theorized that men&#8217;s neckties are phallic symbols, and now I&#8217;m afraid that my musings might be overly inspired by the patriarchy.</p>
<p>But hear me out.  Ties are surely non-functional, so they must exist mostly as symbols.  I think businessmen wear them as indicators of their manhood, like a fashion swordfight. </p>
<p>Tie styles even adapt to reflect and counter developments in society.  In the 1970s, when women&#8217;s &#8220;lib&#8221; was taking hold, men&#8217;s ties were super wide and the knots mighty thick.  In the 80s, as being gay and/or androgynous was starting to seem hip, thin ties took their brief turn in the spotlight. Right now, we&#8217;re back to standard-sized ties, but I bet a president Hillary Clinton would cause a return to wide ties. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about bowties, but I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s some explanation that would fit in with my theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feminist Avatar</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112533</link>
		<dc:creator>Feminist Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112533</guid>
		<description>I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost Clown</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112531</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost Clown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112531</guid>
		<description>I was just gonna say that!

Think Spike and Jack will snog again Thursday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just gonna say that!</p>
<p>Think Spike and Jack will snog again Thursday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauredhel</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112507</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauredhel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112507</guid>
		<description>And underneath, of course, is the huge, mysterious, inexplicable, and dangerous Torchwood. It all works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And underneath, of course, is the huge, mysterious, inexplicable, and dangerous Torchwood. It all works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feminist Avatar</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112503</link>
		<dc:creator>Feminist Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112503</guid>
		<description>Excellent Lauredhel! I especially like the teeth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Lauredhel! I especially like the teeth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauredhel</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112500</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauredhel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/03/30/bouteilian-theory-a-primer/#comment-112500</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In the aim of reclaiming architecture for feminism, I give you examples of ‘vaginal’ symobols:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2164/2349063067_cbd49ff3ec_o.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wales Millennium Centre&lt;/a&gt;.

The vagina is, perhaps, as much a &quot;cavity&quot; as any other body &quot;cavity&quot; is: the abdominal and pleural, and pericardial cavities aren&#039;t full of air or fluid, either. We need better words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In the aim of reclaiming architecture for feminism, I give you examples of ‘vaginal’ symobols:</p></blockquote>
<p>The <a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2164/2349063067_cbd49ff3ec_o.jpg" rel="nofollow">Wales Millennium Centre</a>.</p>
<p>The vagina is, perhaps, as much a &#8220;cavity&#8221; as any other body &#8220;cavity&#8221; is: the abdominal and pleural, and pericardial cavities aren&#8217;t full of air or fluid, either. We need better words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

