<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women-as-chattel interlude with The Apostate</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Fatemeh</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-124059</link>
		<author>Fatemeh</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-124059</guid>
		<description>Fatemeh--the real one--speaking.
Whoa.
I want to thank Jill and Jezebella profusely for sticking up for me here. I also wanted to clarify that APG was banned from our site for harassment and violation of comment moderation policy. And her statements about me and MMW, though hilarious, are not factual.

And, Lara: HOLLA! I've really enjoyed your comments. 

Just to head any confusion off right now: this is the last you will hear from the real Fatemeh on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fatemeh&#8211;the real one&#8211;speaking.<br />
Whoa.<br />
I want to thank Jill and Jezebella profusely for sticking up for me here. I also wanted to clarify that APG was banned from our site for harassment and violation of comment moderation policy. And her statements about me and MMW, though hilarious, are not factual.</p>
<p>And, Lara: HOLLA! I&#8217;ve really enjoyed your comments. </p>
<p>Just to head any confusion off right now: this is the last you will hear from the real Fatemeh on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADInnis21</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123956</link>
		<author>ADInnis21</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123956</guid>
		<description>It's really the same old story.  It's always true that not all of any group live in absurd conditions in any country.

But I have to say, when you look at human rights track records and what happens when certain religious traditions are "exported" well, we've got trouble.

There are always exceptions, but from a feminist point of view, why are we defending any of these idiot woman destroying religions out there.

One of my favorite Dalai Lama comments, by the way-- must be fact checked and may be too good to be true, but here it is: when his royal patriarchal buddhis highness was asked why the Tibetan people have to suffer so much, he replied that it was their karma for treating women so badly over the centuries in Tibet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really the same old story.  It&#8217;s always true that not all of any group live in absurd conditions in any country.</p>
<p>But I have to say, when you look at human rights track records and what happens when certain religious traditions are &#8220;exported&#8221; well, we&#8217;ve got trouble.</p>
<p>There are always exceptions, but from a feminist point of view, why are we defending any of these idiot woman destroying religions out there.</p>
<p>One of my favorite Dalai Lama comments, by the way&#8211; must be fact checked and may be too good to be true, but here it is: when his royal patriarchal buddhis highness was asked why the Tibetan people have to suffer so much, he replied that it was their karma for treating women so badly over the centuries in Tibet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezebella</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123840</link>
		<author>Jezebella</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123840</guid>
		<description>Jael, you always make good points.  You are of course, correct.  But you and I both know that not all Muslim women live in these circumstances.  Given previous comments, which had the general tenor of mainstream American rhetoric regarding Islam, I felt it was important to point out that the conflation of Islam with a race - and thereby, racial stereotypes - is off base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jael, you always make good points.  You are of course, correct.  But you and I both know that not all Muslim women live in these circumstances.  Given previous comments, which had the general tenor of mainstream American rhetoric regarding Islam, I felt it was important to point out that the conflation of Islam with a race - and thereby, racial stereotypes - is off base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123804</link>
		<author>Lara</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123804</guid>
		<description>"I believe women being trapped in cultural norms keeps them pliant and docile. They don’t know where else to go, and haven’t been given the skills of independence and non-tribal thinking. Ali describes her work with Somali immigrant women in Holland quite well, and how utterly brainwashed they were by Imams, husbands, fathers and patriarchy. Stockholm syndrome indeed!"

NON-TRIBAL THINKING??  Wow, way to go with the racial and ethnic stereotypes, Satsuma.  Jesus fuckin Christ.

"And yes! tribal thinking! this isn’t a derogative definition: it’s a factual one."

Um, no, jael, most Muslim peoples are not made up of "tribes."  This only exists in most parts of Afghanistan and maybe one or two other countries.  In most parts of Africa there are ETHNIC GROUPS.  There is a difference between ethnic groups and tribes.  Get it right.
Stop trying to cover up your racism in technical language, cuz this sandnigger bitch ain't fallin' for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe women being trapped in cultural norms keeps them pliant and docile. They don’t know where else to go, and haven’t been given the skills of independence and non-tribal thinking. Ali describes her work with Somali immigrant women in Holland quite well, and how utterly brainwashed they were by Imams, husbands, fathers and patriarchy. Stockholm syndrome indeed!&#8221;</p>
<p>NON-TRIBAL THINKING??  Wow, way to go with the racial and ethnic stereotypes, Satsuma.  Jesus fuckin Christ.</p>
<p>&#8220;And yes! tribal thinking! this isn’t a derogative definition: it’s a factual one.&#8221;</p>
<p>Um, no, jael, most Muslim peoples are not made up of &#8220;tribes.&#8221;  This only exists in most parts of Afghanistan and maybe one or two other countries.  In most parts of Africa there are ETHNIC GROUPS.  There is a difference between ethnic groups and tribes.  Get it right.<br />
Stop trying to cover up your racism in technical language, cuz this sandnigger bitch ain&#8217;t fallin&#8217; for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panoptical</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123789</link>
		<author>panoptical</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123789</guid>
		<description>"Panoptical, if "I am Muslim" means "I am submissive," then it means that when men say it too."

Sure, but I think that we can all agree that it's very different for men to submit to a patriarchal system than for women to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Panoptical, if &#8220;I am Muslim&#8221; means &#8220;I am submissive,&#8221; then it means that when men say it too.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, but I think that we can all agree that it&#8217;s very different for men to submit to a patriarchal system than for women to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123772</link>
		<author>Jill</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123772</guid>
		<description>Twisty, you da bomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twisty, you da bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123759</link>
		<author>Twisty</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123759</guid>
		<description>The rhetoric's been getting a little wackaloony again, and it has been brought to my attention that the commenter posting as "ApostatePakistaniGirl" is a) &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; the blogger known as The Apostate, and b) making wholly unsubstantiated claims concerning Fatemah Fakharaie and Feministe.

The commenter posting as "Jezebella" is neither ApostatePakistaniGirl, The Apostate, nor Fatemah Fakharaie.

Satsuma, a sufficient number of your remarks have struck just the wrong offensive note; please do your blaming elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rhetoric&#8217;s been getting a little wackaloony again, and it has been brought to my attention that the commenter posting as &#8220;ApostatePakistaniGirl&#8221; is a) <em>not</em> the blogger known as The Apostate, and b) making wholly unsubstantiated claims concerning Fatemah Fakharaie and Feministe.</p>
<p>The commenter posting as &#8220;Jezebella&#8221; is neither ApostatePakistaniGirl, The Apostate, nor Fatemah Fakharaie.</p>
<p>Satsuma, a sufficient number of your remarks have struck just the wrong offensive note; please do your blaming elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jael</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123731</link>
		<author>jael</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123731</guid>
		<description>i am not fond of moderation.  I try again. 

&lt;i&gt; *I* know that Muslim is a religious choice and not a racial identity, but I’m not sure Satsuma does. &lt;/i&gt;

Yo, Jez..

The thing is, when religion is used as a socio-cultural tool; a mechanism to regulate all aspects of living, dying and all - it is not a religious choice. It’s the fabric into which you are born. If there is no other choice, if every thing you do is framed through a religious lens; and you 300 miles from the middle of nowhere - where you never get to hear anything different - then being a Muslim, being a Jew, being a Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, whatever - this ceases to to be a choice you make; it simply is.

I don’t necessarily think women are stupid for going a long with all of this, because it is cultural conditioning and brainwashing, and if you leave Islam, does feminism offer a concrete alternative to losing your entire immigrant extended family? I believe women being trapped in cultural norms keeps them pliant and docile. They don’t know where else to go, and haven’t been given the skills of independence and non-tribal thinking.

this is the para you object to, right? I kinda like it. It’s framed up as what, migrants to the west, and the difficulties faced by daughters. But if we leave that out, and we say - no, it’s a paragraph about… women from Chitral, in the North West of Pakistan, near the Afghani boarder, I have no problem with any of it. Indeed - where do you go? What social role can you take on?

And yes! tribal thinking! this isn’t a derogative definition: it’s a factual one. Large parts of the world are organised around tribes, and the thinking of these inside these communities reflect this. it wouldn’t work otherwise. In much the same way as the Chinese system wouldn’t work without rigid control over distributed information and studiously not teaching critical thinking skills. Oppressive systems are supported by oppressive thinking systems, which are internalised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am not fond of moderation.  I try again. </p>
<p><i> *I* know that Muslim is a religious choice and not a racial identity, but I’m not sure Satsuma does. </i></p>
<p>Yo, Jez..</p>
<p>The thing is, when religion is used as a socio-cultural tool; a mechanism to regulate all aspects of living, dying and all - it is not a religious choice. It’s the fabric into which you are born. If there is no other choice, if every thing you do is framed through a religious lens; and you 300 miles from the middle of nowhere - where you never get to hear anything different - then being a Muslim, being a Jew, being a Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, whatever - this ceases to to be a choice you make; it simply is.</p>
<p>I don’t necessarily think women are stupid for going a long with all of this, because it is cultural conditioning and brainwashing, and if you leave Islam, does feminism offer a concrete alternative to losing your entire immigrant extended family? I believe women being trapped in cultural norms keeps them pliant and docile. They don’t know where else to go, and haven’t been given the skills of independence and non-tribal thinking.</p>
<p>this is the para you object to, right? I kinda like it. It’s framed up as what, migrants to the west, and the difficulties faced by daughters. But if we leave that out, and we say - no, it’s a paragraph about… women from Chitral, in the North West of Pakistan, near the Afghani boarder, I have no problem with any of it. Indeed - where do you go? What social role can you take on?</p>
<p>And yes! tribal thinking! this isn’t a derogative definition: it’s a factual one. Large parts of the world are organised around tribes, and the thinking of these inside these communities reflect this. it wouldn’t work otherwise. In much the same way as the Chinese system wouldn’t work without rigid control over distributed information and studiously not teaching critical thinking skills. Oppressive systems are supported by oppressive thinking systems, which are internalised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apostate</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123712</link>
		<author>Apostate</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123712</guid>
		<description>Just jumping in to clarify that "ApostatePakistaniGirl" and I are two different people.

Because of the similarity of our nom de plumes, there was a bit of confusion at &lt;a href="http://rychousmama.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; blog and someone just alerted me that that might be happening here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just jumping in to clarify that &#8220;ApostatePakistaniGirl&#8221; and I are two different people.</p>
<p>Because of the similarity of our nom de plumes, there was a bit of confusion at <a href="http://rychousmama.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> blog and someone just alerted me that that might be happening here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123704</link>
		<author>Lara</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/21/women-as-chattel-interlude-with-the-apostate/#comment-123704</guid>
		<description>"A permission slip. 

Just like the ones I got in elementary school. 

Do they explain why grown women should need a permission slip to travel? Is it supposed to be “for their own safety” or do they not even bother with that pretense?"

Don't you know, Gayle?  It's for empowerfulizment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A permission slip. </p>
<p>Just like the ones I got in elementary school. </p>
<p>Do they explain why grown women should need a permission slip to travel? Is it supposed to be “for their own safety” or do they not even bother with that pretense?&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you know, Gayle?  It&#8217;s for empowerfulizment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
