<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spinster aunt wipes tear from eye</title>
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: In my perambulations &#171; scribblingwoman2</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-125733</link>
		<author>In my perambulations &#171; scribblingwoman2</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-125733</guid>
		<description>[...] Specifically, they made plaster casts of their torsos, a technique about which Twisty Faster has her doubts. I don&#8217;t know, though: I mean, it&#8217;s like breast-feeding in public. Sure there will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Specifically, they made plaster casts of their torsos, a technique about which Twisty Faster has her doubts. I don&#8217;t know, though: I mean, it&#8217;s like breast-feeding in public. Sure there will be [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebewilderness</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-125264</link>
		<author>thebewilderness</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-125264</guid>
		<description>Lar: "I think if I ever made a plaster cast of a body part to show men how I feel about their approval I’d make one of my upraised middle finger."

Perfect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lar: &#8220;I think if I ever made a plaster cast of a body part to show men how I feel about their approval I’d make one of my upraised middle finger.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lar</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124142</link>
		<author>Lar</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124142</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Weeza, I know exactly how you feel.  

Why the hell do random men think we want to know whether they "approve" or not anyway?  And it's not just a shape/size issue.  Some random asshole approached me in a store and asked me why I'm so pale.  When he asked me why I don't tan I told him the truth - (loudly enough for everyone nearby to hear) "because I have skin cancer." Everybody glared at him like he was the biggest jerk and he ran away with his tail between his legs.  Yeah, let me mutilate myself and get cancer so the dudes can approve of my body.

I think if I ever made a plaster cast of a body part to show men how I feel about their approval I'd make one of my upraised middle finger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Weeza, I know exactly how you feel.  </p>
<p>Why the hell do random men think we want to know whether they &#8220;approve&#8221; or not anyway?  And it&#8217;s not just a shape/size issue.  Some random asshole approached me in a store and asked me why I&#8217;m so pale.  When he asked me why I don&#8217;t tan I told him the truth - (loudly enough for everyone nearby to hear) &#8220;because I have skin cancer.&#8221; Everybody glared at him like he was the biggest jerk and he ran away with his tail between his legs.  Yeah, let me mutilate myself and get cancer so the dudes can approve of my body.</p>
<p>I think if I ever made a plaster cast of a body part to show men how I feel about their approval I&#8217;d make one of my upraised middle finger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weeza</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124096</link>
		<author>weeza</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124096</guid>
		<description>O.C.: 'Because, whoever you are, whatever size you are, you can never be small enough.'

As long as you're still a D-cup. I am short and skinny with no boobs. I am 'too small', in the words of a man I was merely trying to purchase carrots from. 

I have just read 'Backlash' for the first time and I am ANGRY. Next, Dale Spender!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.C.: &#8216;Because, whoever you are, whatever size you are, you can never be small enough.&#8217;</p>
<p>As long as you&#8217;re still a D-cup. I am short and skinny with no boobs. I am &#8216;too small&#8217;, in the words of a man I was merely trying to purchase carrots from. </p>
<p>I have just read &#8216;Backlash&#8217; for the first time and I am ANGRY. Next, Dale Spender!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Jane</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124044</link>
		<author>Citizen Jane</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124044</guid>
		<description>FatWhiteMaleEngineerHumanist, I see where you are confused.  It is indeed true that excess testosterone or estrogen can cause irritability, mood swings, and aggression.  However, removing whichever one is in excess tends to result in the body compensating by producing a great deal of the other.  Castration would just set them back at square one.  In fact, it would probably be even worse as the hormonal imbalance is likely to be greater than it was before.  Not to mention that there are health consequences.

Besides, as others have suggested, removing the aggression isn't really what we're aiming for.  What we want is to remove the attitude that they are entitled to act on their feelings of aggression, which has nothing to do with hormones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FatWhiteMaleEngineerHumanist, I see where you are confused.  It is indeed true that excess testosterone or estrogen can cause irritability, mood swings, and aggression.  However, removing whichever one is in excess tends to result in the body compensating by producing a great deal of the other.  Castration would just set them back at square one.  In fact, it would probably be even worse as the hormonal imbalance is likely to be greater than it was before.  Not to mention that there are health consequences.</p>
<p>Besides, as others have suggested, removing the aggression isn&#8217;t really what we&#8217;re aiming for.  What we want is to remove the attitude that they are entitled to act on their feelings of aggression, which has nothing to do with hormones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TP</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124022</link>
		<author>TP</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124022</guid>
		<description>Once again, people with male parts are the first to suggest that removing these parts as a punishment for rape is a compelling idea. I've often said so in the past, mostly because I don't think it's such a big deal to anyone but the most masculine-loving men out there. 

I've come around to the idea that it probably won't cure the most violent and deranged men out there. I still think it would put a kind of damper on sex criminals who are less violent to start with. 

Once you started doing it as a matter of policy, no man would ever be convicted of rape again. In sum, a bad idea, the kind of idea a man comes up with, one that preserves maleness for those of us who rape women politely enough to escape prosecution. 

It would do nothing to diminish male supremacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, people with male parts are the first to suggest that removing these parts as a punishment for rape is a compelling idea. I&#8217;ve often said so in the past, mostly because I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s such a big deal to anyone but the most masculine-loving men out there. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve come around to the idea that it probably won&#8217;t cure the most violent and deranged men out there. I still think it would put a kind of damper on sex criminals who are less violent to start with. </p>
<p>Once you started doing it as a matter of policy, no man would ever be convicted of rape again. In sum, a bad idea, the kind of idea a man comes up with, one that preserves maleness for those of us who rape women politely enough to escape prosecution. </p>
<p>It would do nothing to diminish male supremacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMM</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124021</link>
		<author>AMM</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124021</guid>
		<description>A few minor points:

1.  Castration of pets is done &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; puberty (or whatever you call it with animals); once they've started doing the unwanted behaviors, castrating them won't stop the behaviors.  Or so veterenarians (sp?) have told me.  So, presumably, even rapist dogs wouldn't be stopped from raping by being castrated.

2.  I've read a few books by criminologists.  While they do have to be taken with many grains of salt, I notice that they all talk about how sociopathic behavior always starts with "milder" antisocial behavior which is noticed but laughed off as  being not serious.  While not every groper turns into a rape-murderer, they say it should be taken as a warning of possible sociopathic behavior.

I'm also reminded of how here in New York, when they start cracking down on fare-beating in the subway, they catch a &lt;i&gt;lot&lt;/i&gt; of people who are wanted for more serious crimes.  Not every fare-beater is a serious criminal, but it's much more likely than in the population at large.

As for apologizing after the fact: as I would say to my ex (if I thought she'd listen) -- don't apologize for it, just &lt;i&gt;stop doing it!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few minor points:</p>
<p>1.  Castration of pets is done <i>before</i> puberty (or whatever you call it with animals); once they&#8217;ve started doing the unwanted behaviors, castrating them won&#8217;t stop the behaviors.  Or so veterenarians (sp?) have told me.  So, presumably, even rapist dogs wouldn&#8217;t be stopped from raping by being castrated.</p>
<p>2.  I&#8217;ve read a few books by criminologists.  While they do have to be taken with many grains of salt, I notice that they all talk about how sociopathic behavior always starts with &#8220;milder&#8221; antisocial behavior which is noticed but laughed off as  being not serious.  While not every groper turns into a rape-murderer, they say it should be taken as a warning of possible sociopathic behavior.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also reminded of how here in New York, when they start cracking down on fare-beating in the subway, they catch a <i>lot</i> of people who are wanted for more serious crimes.  Not every fare-beater is a serious criminal, but it&#8217;s much more likely than in the population at large.</p>
<p>As for apologizing after the fact: as I would say to my ex (if I thought she&#8217;d listen) &#8212; don&#8217;t apologize for it, just <i>stop doing it!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawbitch</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124016</link>
		<author>lawbitch</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-124016</guid>
		<description>In short:  Men rape (beat/abuse/mistreat) women because they can.  

Our society allows it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In short:  Men rape (beat/abuse/mistreat) women because they can.  </p>
<p>Our society allows it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pop Feminist</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-123992</link>
		<author>Pop Feminist</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-123992</guid>
		<description>I disagree with your condescending remarks on the Idaho exhibit. Do you feel that women's bodies can ever be exhibited without submitting to their subjugation? The body is a crucial location of social control for all people, women especially. But it is also an insecure site of social control, which is why it must be policed so aggressively by patriarchal agents. In sharing "imperfect", anti-bourgeois female bodies with the public and with each other, these women are exposing the false boundaries between "classical" and "deviant" bodies. 

I doubt any of these women want to deal patriarchy a death-blow with this self-esteem exercise. They are simply sharing their corporeal selves with each other and the world defiantly, which is part of a centuries old tradition of the disempowered, men and women alike. The "body principle" is a cornerstone of carnivalesque rebellion. Modern feminism is founded upon the revelation of shared oppression, and these women-- while not fighting the very structure of our society as a whole-- are refusing to maintain the charade of isolated deviance that is imposed on women through a mass mediated program of body-shame.

Cheers to the Embodiment Project! I hope to see more women seek empowerment through solidarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your condescending remarks on the Idaho exhibit. Do you feel that women&#8217;s bodies can ever be exhibited without submitting to their subjugation? The body is a crucial location of social control for all people, women especially. But it is also an insecure site of social control, which is why it must be policed so aggressively by patriarchal agents. In sharing &#8220;imperfect&#8221;, anti-bourgeois female bodies with the public and with each other, these women are exposing the false boundaries between &#8220;classical&#8221; and &#8220;deviant&#8221; bodies. </p>
<p>I doubt any of these women want to deal patriarchy a death-blow with this self-esteem exercise. They are simply sharing their corporeal selves with each other and the world defiantly, which is part of a centuries old tradition of the disempowered, men and women alike. The &#8220;body principle&#8221; is a cornerstone of carnivalesque rebellion. Modern feminism is founded upon the revelation of shared oppression, and these women&#8211; while not fighting the very structure of our society as a whole&#8211; are refusing to maintain the charade of isolated deviance that is imposed on women through a mass mediated program of body-shame.</p>
<p>Cheers to the Embodiment Project! I hope to see more women seek empowerment through solidarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-123979</link>
		<author>Janet</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2008/07/24/spinster-aunt-wipes-tear-from-eye/#comment-123979</guid>
		<description>Your "groper" reminds me of this little gem. http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/upskirt-filmer-walks-free/2008/07/28/1217097118059.html

An ex-teacher who filmed up a girl's skirt is let off with a suspended sentence. Apparently he's ok because he's a "low to medium" risk of reoffending (How the fuck is that calculated??), he's SORRY (gee I'm sure the victim is pleased) and he didn't sell it to anyone it was for his own private pervefest. Makes me fucking livid.

Of course the judge is a woman but I bet the boy judges are really pleased that she's not some weirdy beardy feminist who thinks the production of child pornography is like, gee, um maybe a criminal offence worthy of gaol time?

Thank fuck some of us have thought it through, Twisty, I love your blog. :-)

Signed,
massively fucking angry Australian radical feminist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;groper&#8221; reminds me of this little gem. <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/upskirt-filmer-walks-free/2008/07/28/1217097118059.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/upskirt-filmer-walks-free/2008/07/28/1217097118059.html</a></p>
<p>An ex-teacher who filmed up a girl&#8217;s skirt is let off with a suspended sentence. Apparently he&#8217;s ok because he&#8217;s a &#8220;low to medium&#8221; risk of reoffending (How the fuck is that calculated??), he&#8217;s SORRY (gee I&#8217;m sure the victim is pleased) and he didn&#8217;t sell it to anyone it was for his own private pervefest. Makes me fucking livid.</p>
<p>Of course the judge is a woman but I bet the boy judges are really pleased that she&#8217;s not some weirdy beardy feminist who thinks the production of child pornography is like, gee, um maybe a criminal offence worthy of gaol time?</p>
<p>Thank fuck some of us have thought it through, Twisty, I love your blog. :-)</p>
<p>Signed,<br />
massively fucking angry Australian radical feminist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
