<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No post today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Submission as a revolutionary calling? &#171; Lady Lydia&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-145340</link>
		<dc:creator>Submission as a revolutionary calling? &#171; Lady Lydia&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-145340</guid>
		<description>[...] as a revolutionary&#160;calling?  Jump to Comments   I Blame the Patriarchy tells us what is wrong with women thinking submission is the pathway to heaven.  She says:  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a revolutionary&nbsp;calling?  Jump to Comments   I Blame the Patriarchy tells us what is wrong with women thinking submission is the pathway to heaven.  She says:  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virago</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139974</link>
		<dc:creator>virago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139974</guid>
		<description>&quot;Straight to crazy land, but they like staying at home and managing their own time and not having layoffs and job reviews and competing with men. It can suck. Being a stay at home mom and wife, you don’t face having your work thrown in you face and work that is meaningless and dissatisfying because you’re in the pink ghetto or under the glass ceiling. At home during the day, you are bigger than everyone else, if you are surrounded with children. You don’t get written up or annual reviews where credit is given to someone else. You don’t get laid off from being a mom. You don’t have to get in the game when it comes to feminist battles, which aren’t easy.&quot;

I have to disagree with you here because there is a big difference between being a stay at home mom/wife and being a surrendered wife. A surrendered wife may also be a stay at home mom/wife, but she buys into a theology that puts her second to her husband in authority. She may not have to face job reviews, layoffs, or annual reviews from an outside employer. Instead, the surrendered wife has to raise her children, keep her house clean, and act submissive the way her husband wants her to, and HE gets all the credit. The surrendered wife may not get laid off from being a mom, but she doesn&#039;t get a lot of breaks either. And if she does her work well, she gets her husband&#039;s approval and heaven&#039;s rewards. If she screws up, she&#039;s a bad wife and mother and hellfire awaits. OTOH, being a SAHM doesn&#039;t automatically make a woman believe that she is inferior to her husband, or that she can&#039;t be in an egalitarian relationship with her husband. Unfortuantely, my sister-in-law doesn&#039;t recognize that the reason she gets a lot of free time, or gets to make decisions concerning kids and their financial situation as a SAHM and wife is because she has a supportive husband who does his share of the housework/childcare without holding his role as breadwinner over her head as some kind of lord of the manor. Ironically, she wants to force him into this role because of some stupid religious theology. Her life as a SAHM and wife won&#039;t be as pleasant than. And I know plenty of SAHM/wives who are very active feminists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Straight to crazy land, but they like staying at home and managing their own time and not having layoffs and job reviews and competing with men. It can suck. Being a stay at home mom and wife, you don’t face having your work thrown in you face and work that is meaningless and dissatisfying because you’re in the pink ghetto or under the glass ceiling. At home during the day, you are bigger than everyone else, if you are surrounded with children. You don’t get written up or annual reviews where credit is given to someone else. You don’t get laid off from being a mom. You don’t have to get in the game when it comes to feminist battles, which aren’t easy.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have to disagree with you here because there is a big difference between being a stay at home mom/wife and being a surrendered wife. A surrendered wife may also be a stay at home mom/wife, but she buys into a theology that puts her second to her husband in authority. She may not have to face job reviews, layoffs, or annual reviews from an outside employer. Instead, the surrendered wife has to raise her children, keep her house clean, and act submissive the way her husband wants her to, and HE gets all the credit. The surrendered wife may not get laid off from being a mom, but she doesn&#8217;t get a lot of breaks either. And if she does her work well, she gets her husband&#8217;s approval and heaven&#8217;s rewards. If she screws up, she&#8217;s a bad wife and mother and hellfire awaits. OTOH, being a SAHM doesn&#8217;t automatically make a woman believe that she is inferior to her husband, or that she can&#8217;t be in an egalitarian relationship with her husband. Unfortuantely, my sister-in-law doesn&#8217;t recognize that the reason she gets a lot of free time, or gets to make decisions concerning kids and their financial situation as a SAHM and wife is because she has a supportive husband who does his share of the housework/childcare without holding his role as breadwinner over her head as some kind of lord of the manor. Ironically, she wants to force him into this role because of some stupid religious theology. Her life as a SAHM and wife won&#8217;t be as pleasant than. And I know plenty of SAHM/wives who are very active feminists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139802</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139802</guid>
		<description>&quot;Until we can all buy our own ranches in the wilderness, concessions to the patriarchy are inevitable.&quot;

As the owner of a ranchette in the wilderness, I can tell you that it doesn&#039;t really mitigate the necessity of concessions to the patriarchy. You know what would, though?

FEMINIST REVOLT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Until we can all buy our own ranches in the wilderness, concessions to the patriarchy are inevitable.&#8221;</p>
<p>As the owner of a ranchette in the wilderness, I can tell you that it doesn&#8217;t really mitigate the necessity of concessions to the patriarchy. You know what would, though?</p>
<p>FEMINIST REVOLT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orlando</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139796</link>
		<dc:creator>orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139796</guid>
		<description>Australia day is a good time to reflect on the way this country so often takes with one hand but gives with the other. Our nominal head of state is called the &quot;Governor General&quot;, who is (get this) the representative of the British Queen in Australia. Archaic and imperialist? Why yes. But our current one is a kick-arse feminist.

Also time to reflect that it&#039;s probably kind of healthy that most people have trouble remembering the date.

Also props to Hedgepig for creating the opportuntiy to use the phrase &quot;veritable cavalcade&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia day is a good time to reflect on the way this country so often takes with one hand but gives with the other. Our nominal head of state is called the &#8220;Governor General&#8221;, who is (get this) the representative of the British Queen in Australia. Archaic and imperialist? Why yes. But our current one is a kick-arse feminist.</p>
<p>Also time to reflect that it&#8217;s probably kind of healthy that most people have trouble remembering the date.</p>
<p>Also props to Hedgepig for creating the opportuntiy to use the phrase &#8220;veritable cavalcade&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedgepig</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139775</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedgepig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139775</guid>
		<description>The Amazing Kim: By kangaroo-harassers I assume you mean Australians, so count me in. Today being Australia Day (the day we all say yay because a ship-load of sad British bastards landed to start killing all the natives off with cholera)there has been a veritable cavalcade of old cars with Australian flags on &#039;em going past my place. One of them had &quot;Born in the USA&quot; blaring as it chuffed along. I shared a larf with my Bruce over that one. (&quot;my Bruce&quot;, rather than &quot;my Nigel&quot;, because it&#039;s Australia Day. Also, his name&#039;s Bruce).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Amazing Kim: By kangaroo-harassers I assume you mean Australians, so count me in. Today being Australia Day (the day we all say yay because a ship-load of sad British bastards landed to start killing all the natives off with cholera)there has been a veritable cavalcade of old cars with Australian flags on &#8216;em going past my place. One of them had &#8220;Born in the USA&#8221; blaring as it chuffed along. I shared a larf with my Bruce over that one. (&#8220;my Bruce&#8221;, rather than &#8220;my Nigel&#8221;, because it&#8217;s Australia Day. Also, his name&#8217;s Bruce).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Amazing Kim</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139773</link>
		<dc:creator>The Amazing Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139773</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Living with cognitive dissonance is very distrubing. I’m certainly disturbed by the disparity between my beliefs and my actions.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, we all live within a capitalist system, which is inherently oppressive, and as a function of that oppression we all need to do things that aren&#039;t always PC to get by. 

Until we can all buy our own ranches in the wilderness, concessions  to the patriarchy are inevitable. She wears heels, you do housework, I don&#039;t eat cake for breakfast every day to save up Conventionally Attractiveness points (I&#039;m hoping to save up enough to offset the personality - then I will be unstoppable.)

The most important thing is not to fool yourself into thinking you&#039;re doing it all for your empowerful, fun self.


Just out of curiosity, how many kangaroo-harassers do we have here? There seems to be quite a few of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Living with cognitive dissonance is very distrubing. I’m certainly disturbed by the disparity between my beliefs and my actions.</i></p>
<p>Well, we all live within a capitalist system, which is inherently oppressive, and as a function of that oppression we all need to do things that aren&#8217;t always PC to get by. </p>
<p>Until we can all buy our own ranches in the wilderness, concessions  to the patriarchy are inevitable. She wears heels, you do housework, I don&#8217;t eat cake for breakfast every day to save up Conventionally Attractiveness points (I&#8217;m hoping to save up enough to offset the personality &#8211; then I will be unstoppable.)</p>
<p>The most important thing is not to fool yourself into thinking you&#8217;re doing it all for your empowerful, fun self.</p>
<p>Just out of curiosity, how many kangaroo-harassers do we have here? There seems to be quite a few of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sevanetta</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139765</link>
		<dc:creator>sevanetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139765</guid>
		<description>Oh geez I&#039;ve been called up! I&#039;m flattered that you&#039;re interested, Twisty. OK anecdotes are coming. Soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh geez I&#8217;ve been called up! I&#8217;m flattered that you&#8217;re interested, Twisty. OK anecdotes are coming. Soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139764</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139764</guid>
		<description>&quot;nature doesn’t really give a damn how holy you are, though it may have a response to your carbon output.&quot;

Amen, sister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;nature doesn’t really give a damn how holy you are, though it may have a response to your carbon output.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen, sister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compcat</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139761</link>
		<dc:creator>Compcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139761</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget, they also get social status within their church group for &quot;suffering&quot;.  Though only if you are lucky enough to get a husband who is only a little emotionally abusive, or come out of your depression with &quot;stronger&quot; faith, well, instant social boost for you.  

If you are unlucky enough to get the husband with the pot of boiling water,  you get to become bonding gossip for the in crowd.  Without all of these lovely dysfunctional relationships to gossip about, fewer of these people would actually attend church.

It&#039;s also freeing for people to believe that bad things only happen in the world because there are evil, or at least bad people (who aren&#039;t them).  Instead of the truth, which is that we are all monkeys, capable of doing really horrible things.  Heck, around 80 percent of us will torture if told to by an authority figure.  And nature doesn&#039;t really give a damn how holy you are, though it may have a response to your carbon output.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget, they also get social status within their church group for &#8220;suffering&#8221;.  Though only if you are lucky enough to get a husband who is only a little emotionally abusive, or come out of your depression with &#8220;stronger&#8221; faith, well, instant social boost for you.  </p>
<p>If you are unlucky enough to get the husband with the pot of boiling water,  you get to become bonding gossip for the in crowd.  Without all of these lovely dysfunctional relationships to gossip about, fewer of these people would actually attend church.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also freeing for people to believe that bad things only happen in the world because there are evil, or at least bad people (who aren&#8217;t them).  Instead of the truth, which is that we are all monkeys, capable of doing really horrible things.  Heck, around 80 percent of us will torture if told to by an authority figure.  And nature doesn&#8217;t really give a damn how holy you are, though it may have a response to your carbon output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joolya</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139742</link>
		<dc:creator>Joolya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/01/23/no-post-today-5/#comment-139742</guid>
		<description>Are these &quot;Taken in Hand&quot; type women really just subs who can&#039;t admit that? Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these &#8220;Taken in Hand&#8221; type women really just subs who can&#8217;t admit that? Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

