<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Dakota lege to women: &#8220;Murderer!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:36:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On abortion &#171; Raising My Boychick</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-159612</link>
		<dc:creator>On abortion &#171; Raising My Boychick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-159612</guid>
		<description>[...] to say I am most definitely pro-choice. So when I read Twisty (at I Blame the Patriarchy) say that expressing a desire to reduce the number of abortions is inherently an anti-feminist stance, I do something of a double take (ok, perhaps that&#8217;s not exactly what she said, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to say I am most definitely pro-choice. So when I read Twisty (at I Blame the Patriarchy) say that expressing a desire to reduce the number of abortions is inherently an anti-feminist stance, I do something of a double take (ok, perhaps that&#8217;s not exactly what she said, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feminist?s žodis: apvaisinimas &#124; Laisvo oro direktor?</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-150747</link>
		<dc:creator>Feminist?s žodis: apvaisinimas &#124; Laisvo oro direktor?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-150747</guid>
		<description>[...] Apvaisinimas - tai momentas, kai šventa, s?moninga ir truput? išsigandusi gyvyb?s s?kla ?žengia ? dam? ir pradeda skleisti J?zaus meil? jos pilve. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apvaisinimas &#8211; tai momentas, kai šventa, s?moninga ir truput? išsigandusi gyvyb?s s?kla ?žengia ? dam? ir pradeda skleisti J?zaus meil? jos pilve. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SouthDakotaBlamer</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143570</link>
		<dc:creator>SouthDakotaBlamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143570</guid>
		<description>&quot;The goal should be &#039;less unintended pregnancies&#039;, not less abortions, but try asking the ND lege to fund family planning &amp; sex ed and see how far that gets you.&quot;

Ah, yes, Jezebella, but don&#039;t you realize that more unintended pregnancies are good for the economy? Feast your eyes on this from one of my state&#039;s loudest fundegelicals:

http://www.voicescarryblog.com/476/

So now my body is enslaved to blastocysts AND the economy. Oh happy day! Fuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The goal should be &#8216;less unintended pregnancies&#8217;, not less abortions, but try asking the ND lege to fund family planning &amp; sex ed and see how far that gets you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, yes, Jezebella, but don&#8217;t you realize that more unintended pregnancies are good for the economy? Feast your eyes on this from one of my state&#8217;s loudest fundegelicals:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.voicescarryblog.com/476/" rel="nofollow">http://www.voicescarryblog.com/476/</a></p>
<p>So now my body is enslaved to blastocysts AND the economy. Oh happy day! Fuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariann</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143537</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143537</guid>
		<description>I apologize in advance for the links, these are in response to Courtney&#039;s question:

This site is a good overview of the relevant texts and opinions related to abortion:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/jud_abor.htm

This is a much more complex dealing with the issue:
http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/Cavalier/Forum/abortion/background/judaism1.html

Let me state up front that these views are NOT entirely in accordance with rad-fem views on abortion - while I as a rad-femmer would say that abortion on demand is necessary and good and that a woman as a human being has a fundamental right to make such decisions for herself without consulting anyone else, this is not the view supported by these sources.  Rather, they deal with the classification of fetuses as part of a woman&#039;s body rather than separate entities, &quot;potential lives&quot; rather than human lives requiring the protection other human lives require, and the idea that a woman&#039;s life or emotional well-being always takes precedence over the potentiality of someone else&#039;s life.  Also, there&#039;s an idea here that abortion is not simply permissible but REQUIRED in certain circumstances, because you&#039;re not allowed to let a woman die if killing the fetus would save her (even if the way she would die would be by suicide).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize in advance for the links, these are in response to Courtney&#8217;s question:</p>
<p>This site is a good overview of the relevant texts and opinions related to abortion:<br />
<a href="http://www.religioustolerance.org/jud_abor.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.religioustolerance.org/jud_abor.htm</a></p>
<p>This is a much more complex dealing with the issue:<br />
<a href="http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/Cavalier/Forum/abortion/background/judaism1.html" rel="nofollow">http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/Cavalier/Forum/abortion/background/judaism1.html</a></p>
<p>Let me state up front that these views are NOT entirely in accordance with rad-fem views on abortion &#8211; while I as a rad-femmer would say that abortion on demand is necessary and good and that a woman as a human being has a fundamental right to make such decisions for herself without consulting anyone else, this is not the view supported by these sources.  Rather, they deal with the classification of fetuses as part of a woman&#8217;s body rather than separate entities, &#8220;potential lives&#8221; rather than human lives requiring the protection other human lives require, and the idea that a woman&#8217;s life or emotional well-being always takes precedence over the potentiality of someone else&#8217;s life.  Also, there&#8217;s an idea here that abortion is not simply permissible but REQUIRED in certain circumstances, because you&#8217;re not allowed to let a woman die if killing the fetus would save her (even if the way she would die would be by suicide).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tigs</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143464</link>
		<dc:creator>Tigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143464</guid>
		<description>Kudos blamers, my only objection is to note however, that continued breastfeeding is also something that women, even when they become mothers, should not feel pressured to do.
Yes, breast is best, blah, blah, but there are generations of human beings who have survived just fine on corporate fake-milk.    
If a woman does not want to sacrifice her body, she should not feel like she has to--at any point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos blamers, my only objection is to note however, that continued breastfeeding is also something that women, even when they become mothers, should not feel pressured to do.<br />
Yes, breast is best, blah, blah, but there are generations of human beings who have survived just fine on corporate fake-milk.<br />
If a woman does not want to sacrifice her body, she should not feel like she has to&#8211;at any point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blondie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143380</link>
		<dc:creator>blondie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143380</guid>
		<description>If a fertilized egg is a person with all of a person&#039;s attendant rights, then the egg should also bear all of the attendant responsibilities.

Thus, a fertilized egg should not be able to hold hostage another person, i.e., the mother, thereby creating a grave risk of serious bodily injury or death to the mother.  If the fertilized egg insists on this unwelcome invasion of the mother&#039;s body, the mother should be able, i.e., have the right to personal bodily integrity, to act in self-defense, even with deadly force, against that grave risk of serious bodily injury or death.  

Otherwise, a mother has a lesser ability to protect herself from a grave risk of bodily harm or death than a person who thinks a burglar is on his deck trying to steal his barbeque grill. (In many states, if you&#039;re home and think someone is trying to burgle your home, you get to shoot them.  yeehaw.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a fertilized egg is a person with all of a person&#8217;s attendant rights, then the egg should also bear all of the attendant responsibilities.</p>
<p>Thus, a fertilized egg should not be able to hold hostage another person, i.e., the mother, thereby creating a grave risk of serious bodily injury or death to the mother.  If the fertilized egg insists on this unwelcome invasion of the mother&#8217;s body, the mother should be able, i.e., have the right to personal bodily integrity, to act in self-defense, even with deadly force, against that grave risk of serious bodily injury or death.  </p>
<p>Otherwise, a mother has a lesser ability to protect herself from a grave risk of bodily harm or death than a person who thinks a burglar is on his deck trying to steal his barbeque grill. (In many states, if you&#8217;re home and think someone is trying to burgle your home, you get to shoot them.  yeehaw.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143362</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143362</guid>
		<description>@Courtney:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;FWIW, my DBH is seriously thinking about RISUG. I suspect there are more men than would admit it who really would like some birth control besides a condom or a vasectomy.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Funny how RISUG isn&#039;t mentioned at all in US media. I never heard of RISUG before today, and I can&#039;t find a single mention of it in Google News. It also sounds like development of the drug is being stalled. Looks like the P is fighting hard against that one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Courtney:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;FWIW, my DBH is seriously thinking about RISUG. I suspect there are more men than would admit it who really would like some birth control besides a condom or a vasectomy.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Funny how RISUG isn&#8217;t mentioned at all in US media. I never heard of RISUG before today, and I can&#8217;t find a single mention of it in Google News. It also sounds like development of the drug is being stalled. Looks like the P is fighting hard against that one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreaming of Parenting &#171; The Apostate</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143360</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreaming of Parenting &#171; The Apostate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143360</guid>
		<description>[...] Twisty: North Dakota CongressMEN are thinking like the muddled woman in my dream and have declared fertilized eggs are fully human and have the right to life, liberty and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twisty: North Dakota CongressMEN are thinking like the muddled woman in my dream and have declared fertilized eggs are fully human and have the right to life, liberty and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedbudget</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143343</link>
		<dc:creator>speedbudget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143343</guid>
		<description>Who the hell is Serene Wright and how did s/he get on my blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the hell is Serene Wright and how did s/he get on my blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143312</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/02/17/north-dakota-lege-to-women-murderer/#comment-143312</guid>
		<description>“&#039;Men’s bodies are owned by God and The State. Since God says whatever we say He says, and we run The State, no problem. Women’s bodies are owned by God, The State, and Men. Any other people we define as less than human (e.g. black people) are owned by God, The State, White Men, White Women, and everyone else.&#039; A lot of people seem to get really touchy when I mention this, though.&quot;

Ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“&#8217;Men’s bodies are owned by God and The State. Since God says whatever we say He says, and we run The State, no problem. Women’s bodies are owned by God, The State, and Men. Any other people we define as less than human (e.g. black people) are owned by God, The State, White Men, White Women, and everyone else.&#8217; A lot of people seem to get really touchy when I mention this, though.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
