<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protuberance Korner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clare</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147413</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147413</guid>
		<description>Hedgepig, I think reform is problematic for those reasons too. 

Conscious femininity is women placing their value along the male gaze; fighting for the patriarchy while saying &#039;I&#039;m still pretty and fuckable.&#039; When this is seen, men have the power to ask &#039;how?&#039; and women don&#039;t. Men then get to create standards and patriarchy happily provides that information for us. Being feminine, basing your life appearance and character around what makes men want you as an orifice is doomed failure. First men allocate a shelf- life to your &#039;usefulness&#039;, no matter how feminine; and second, it&#039;s giving oppressers the bar to still set standards for us. Raging for feminist victory while looking over your shoulder back at what men want you to be is handing any desired control over immediately. 

True hetero feminist victory is dependent on finding what a female truly is - a human that doesn&#039;t conform to trying to be like the oppressers or the oppressed. Creates a character that isn&#039;t limited to her being young and beautiful - so that she feels she has the same worth at 20 as she does at 70. She&#039;s the one who picks a man, who chooses her because she&#039;s a person over a &#039;female&#039;. Het feminist victory is females being valued and setting standards, male opinion being trivial to them. When male opinion on how we should be is unimportant, that&#039;s when we have success, regardless of what we stop for a brief moment to let men do to us. 

Bottom line: being female shouldn&#039;t be the important thing, for het or homosexual women. Being a woman over a man should be the very last thing you consider about yourself, as should whether you desire PIV sex or not. I&#039;m not gay (FYI) but I let my behaviour flow more than most het/ hom women, like an autistic/ schizophrenic woman who loses all sense of things of how she should be in society. Maybe those are the freest.

Bluey, maybe there&#039;s no problem with wanting PIV sex, as long as you try hard to not let that sex define you. Arguing about feeling excluded liking PIV sex suggests you make it a greater part of your life and character than it should be. I too like PIV sex but I don&#039;t let it define me and thus anger me. 

A lot of animals seem to reproduce without a patriarchy. Sex isn&#039;t culture inscripted, it&#039;s a part of life they don&#039;t even think about. While animal cartoonists give animal females pink bows and painted nails, gender is no issue because reproductive sex is no issue. (Sorry to bring evopsych into it!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hedgepig, I think reform is problematic for those reasons too. </p>
<p>Conscious femininity is women placing their value along the male gaze; fighting for the patriarchy while saying &#8216;I&#8217;m still pretty and fuckable.&#8217; When this is seen, men have the power to ask &#8216;how?&#8217; and women don&#8217;t. Men then get to create standards and patriarchy happily provides that information for us. Being feminine, basing your life appearance and character around what makes men want you as an orifice is doomed failure. First men allocate a shelf- life to your &#8216;usefulness&#8217;, no matter how feminine; and second, it&#8217;s giving oppressers the bar to still set standards for us. Raging for feminist victory while looking over your shoulder back at what men want you to be is handing any desired control over immediately. </p>
<p>True hetero feminist victory is dependent on finding what a female truly is &#8211; a human that doesn&#8217;t conform to trying to be like the oppressers or the oppressed. Creates a character that isn&#8217;t limited to her being young and beautiful &#8211; so that she feels she has the same worth at 20 as she does at 70. She&#8217;s the one who picks a man, who chooses her because she&#8217;s a person over a &#8216;female&#8217;. Het feminist victory is females being valued and setting standards, male opinion being trivial to them. When male opinion on how we should be is unimportant, that&#8217;s when we have success, regardless of what we stop for a brief moment to let men do to us. </p>
<p>Bottom line: being female shouldn&#8217;t be the important thing, for het or homosexual women. Being a woman over a man should be the very last thing you consider about yourself, as should whether you desire PIV sex or not. I&#8217;m not gay (FYI) but I let my behaviour flow more than most het/ hom women, like an autistic/ schizophrenic woman who loses all sense of things of how she should be in society. Maybe those are the freest.</p>
<p>Bluey, maybe there&#8217;s no problem with wanting PIV sex, as long as you try hard to not let that sex define you. Arguing about feeling excluded liking PIV sex suggests you make it a greater part of your life and character than it should be. I too like PIV sex but I don&#8217;t let it define me and thus anger me. </p>
<p>A lot of animals seem to reproduce without a patriarchy. Sex isn&#8217;t culture inscripted, it&#8217;s a part of life they don&#8217;t even think about. While animal cartoonists give animal females pink bows and painted nails, gender is no issue because reproductive sex is no issue. (Sorry to bring evopsych into it!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisty</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147409</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147409</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m just not sure we can end patriarchy’s dominance while still engaging in activities that are the lynchpin of the system.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is why I advocate the Femininity Work Stoppage. I&#039;m not 100% sure it would work, but hell, it couldn&#039;t make it any WORSE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’m just not sure we can end patriarchy’s dominance while still engaging in activities that are the lynchpin of the system.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is why I advocate the Femininity Work Stoppage. I&#8217;m not 100% sure it would work, but hell, it couldn&#8217;t make it any WORSE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedgepig</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147400</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedgepig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147400</guid>
		<description>Reproductive sex under patriarchy IS the foundation of patriarchy. After the revolution, maybe not. But while patriarchy is the dominant ideology, sex is one of the fundamental problems. I&#039;m just not sure we can end patriarchy&#039;s dominance while still engaging in activities that are the lynchpin of the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reproductive sex under patriarchy IS the foundation of patriarchy. After the revolution, maybe not. But while patriarchy is the dominant ideology, sex is one of the fundamental problems. I&#8217;m just not sure we can end patriarchy&#8217;s dominance while still engaging in activities that are the lynchpin of the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedbudget</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147220</link>
		<dc:creator>speedbudget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147220</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It is possible to be celibate if one doesn’t find a partner capable of participating in a healthy relationship - straight or lesbian. Persevering in a bad relationship of any form is akin to slow suicide and that is the state of most couples today.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This.

I&#039;m about to buy my first house, and I&#039;m dead terrified of something weird happening with my job and not being able to make the mortgage payments.  If anyone wants to come live in a celibate commune with a neurotic Brussels Griffon and a clawfoot tub, I&#039;m accepting applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It is possible to be celibate if one doesn’t find a partner capable of participating in a healthy relationship &#8211; straight or lesbian. Persevering in a bad relationship of any form is akin to slow suicide and that is the state of most couples today.</p></blockquote>
<p>This.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m about to buy my first house, and I&#8217;m dead terrified of something weird happening with my job and not being able to make the mortgage payments.  If anyone wants to come live in a celibate commune with a neurotic Brussels Griffon and a clawfoot tub, I&#8217;m accepting applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeleine</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147219</link>
		<dc:creator>madeleine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147219</guid>
		<description>Sex is not the foundation of patriarchy. Sex is one of the morally neutral phenomena that the patriarchy abuses. Sex is the foundation of humanity, of most forms of life, it is the song of the aeons of evolution that we carry in our flesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sex is not the foundation of patriarchy. Sex is one of the morally neutral phenomena that the patriarchy abuses. Sex is the foundation of humanity, of most forms of life, it is the song of the aeons of evolution that we carry in our flesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agasaya</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147216</link>
		<dc:creator>Agasaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 08:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147216</guid>
		<description>Oy, my grammar (above).  Sorry, but there is no edit button.

Heterosexuality is not an abnormal state.  Finding a decent partner in order to practice heterosexuality is abnormally difficult.  That&#039;s also true in gay and lesbian relationships. 
The system churns out a lot of jerks through cognitive and behavioral programming which offers tangible and/or intangible rewards for identifying with, if not belonging to, the patriarchy.
Money and sainthood, for instance.

When you have the physical and fiscal power to get away with being egregiously wrong, it is tempting to get rid of all the associated characteristics of the wrong-doers. But heterosexuality is pretty much here to stay, even if it is fashionable to deny it and most practitioners will lead very lonely lives.  Women will never enjoy that state until more men are raised, against the odds, to realize that a key isn&#039;t superior to a lock just because it&#039;s pointy. 

The P advertises feminism as the sole province of lesbians, to keep het women from jumping into the fray.  It&#039;s called,  &#039;Divide and Conquer&#039; and it works really well for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oy, my grammar (above).  Sorry, but there is no edit button.</p>
<p>Heterosexuality is not an abnormal state.  Finding a decent partner in order to practice heterosexuality is abnormally difficult.  That&#8217;s also true in gay and lesbian relationships.<br />
The system churns out a lot of jerks through cognitive and behavioral programming which offers tangible and/or intangible rewards for identifying with, if not belonging to, the patriarchy.<br />
Money and sainthood, for instance.</p>
<p>When you have the physical and fiscal power to get away with being egregiously wrong, it is tempting to get rid of all the associated characteristics of the wrong-doers. But heterosexuality is pretty much here to stay, even if it is fashionable to deny it and most practitioners will lead very lonely lives.  Women will never enjoy that state until more men are raised, against the odds, to realize that a key isn&#8217;t superior to a lock just because it&#8217;s pointy. </p>
<p>The P advertises feminism as the sole province of lesbians, to keep het women from jumping into the fray.  It&#8217;s called,  &#8216;Divide and Conquer&#8217; and it works really well for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedgepig</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147209</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedgepig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147209</guid>
		<description>Agasaya, I find it very heartening to hear your opinion that heterosexuality is compatible with feminist activism. I sincerely hope you&#039;re right. 
It&#039;s not that I think hetero women are unworthy of shaping our society, it&#039;s just that I fear we are incapable of effecting real revolutionary change if we continue to build and re-build the very foundations of patriarchy, which are het sex and the patriarchal family. What you may be describing is reform, rather than revolution, and for a long time I was a reformist. But now I wonder if total destruction of the patriarchal system is the only way to really beat it. Reforms seem to be co-opted and corrucpted by the system, eg. the idea of sexual freedom for women has been repackaged as women must be willing and attractive orifices at all times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agasaya, I find it very heartening to hear your opinion that heterosexuality is compatible with feminist activism. I sincerely hope you&#8217;re right.<br />
It&#8217;s not that I think hetero women are unworthy of shaping our society, it&#8217;s just that I fear we are incapable of effecting real revolutionary change if we continue to build and re-build the very foundations of patriarchy, which are het sex and the patriarchal family. What you may be describing is reform, rather than revolution, and for a long time I was a reformist. But now I wonder if total destruction of the patriarchal system is the only way to really beat it. Reforms seem to be co-opted and corrucpted by the system, eg. the idea of sexual freedom for women has been repackaged as women must be willing and attractive orifices at all times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agasaya</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147201</link>
		<dc:creator>Agasaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147201</guid>
		<description>Hedgepig,

1. Loved the poem! 

2. We have shed blood in the effort to remove government from our bedrooms. Let&#039;s not denigrate the value of that effort (still in process) by deciding certain citizens are more or less worthy of shaping their society based upon sexual preference.  
  
3. If you feel you are ineffectual as a woman in participating in the habilitation of  society because you are heterosexual, why bother blaming or complaining at all?  Give it up.  Send Nigel back to his mother if she&#039;ll have him.  Mothers ought to give up their sons if they, through some awful prank of nature, happen to be heterosexual.  Anyone they would choose to partner would automatically be harmful to every woman females on the planet.

Women don&#039;t think with their vaginas. We are, in fact, capable of rational thought after engaging in sexual congress with the enlightened males of Planet Earth.

Both of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hedgepig,</p>
<p>1. Loved the poem! </p>
<p>2. We have shed blood in the effort to remove government from our bedrooms. Let&#8217;s not denigrate the value of that effort (still in process) by deciding certain citizens are more or less worthy of shaping their society based upon sexual preference.  </p>
<p>3. If you feel you are ineffectual as a woman in participating in the habilitation of  society because you are heterosexual, why bother blaming or complaining at all?  Give it up.  Send Nigel back to his mother if she&#8217;ll have him.  Mothers ought to give up their sons if they, through some awful prank of nature, happen to be heterosexual.  Anyone they would choose to partner would automatically be harmful to every woman females on the planet.</p>
<p>Women don&#8217;t think with their vaginas. We are, in fact, capable of rational thought after engaging in sexual congress with the enlightened males of Planet Earth.</p>
<p>Both of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedgepig</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147195</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedgepig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147195</guid>
		<description>I logged on today thinking I&#039;d argue with Agasaya about the political ramifications of heterosexual relations, and then I thought, nah, I&#039;ll just sing a silly song in honour of Twisty&#039;s birthday. 

*cough cough*

Looking out on the morning rain
I used to feel so uninspired
And when I knew I had to face another day
Lard, it made me feel so tired.

I didn&#039;t know just what was wrong with society
Till you came along to name it.
You put your rubber boot squarely up the P,
And you helped me blame it.
Now I&#039;m no longer doubtful of what I&#039;m living for,
Cos if I can screw the Patriarchy I don&#039;t need no more.

Cos you make me feel
You make me feel etc
Like a natural Blamer

Happy 50th Twisty, and thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I logged on today thinking I&#8217;d argue with Agasaya about the political ramifications of heterosexual relations, and then I thought, nah, I&#8217;ll just sing a silly song in honour of Twisty&#8217;s birthday. </p>
<p>*cough cough*</p>
<p>Looking out on the morning rain<br />
I used to feel so uninspired<br />
And when I knew I had to face another day<br />
Lard, it made me feel so tired.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know just what was wrong with society<br />
Till you came along to name it.<br />
You put your rubber boot squarely up the P,<br />
And you helped me blame it.<br />
Now I&#8217;m no longer doubtful of what I&#8217;m living for,<br />
Cos if I can screw the Patriarchy I don&#8217;t need no more.</p>
<p>Cos you make me feel<br />
You make me feel etc<br />
Like a natural Blamer</p>
<p>Happy 50th Twisty, and thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/04/07/protuberance-korner/#comment-147165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=1919#comment-147165</guid>
		<description>Happy birthday, kid, and keep havin&#039; em at least till you catch up with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy birthday, kid, and keep havin&#8217; em at least till you catch up with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

