<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spinster auntism lives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vagabondi</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-179743</link>
		<dc:creator>vagabondi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 04:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-179743</guid>
		<description>Rididill: That&#039;s not an inaccurate observation, as far as it goes, but the poit of &lt;i&gt;analysis&lt;/i&gt; is to take that extra step and ask why? What societal beliefs cause the observed phenomenon? What power differentials might be in play here, and do we want to perpetuate them? &quot;Prick&quot; is a wimpy insult; &quot;cunt&quot; is an atom bomb. Why would it be that calling someone a &quot;man&#039;s genitals&quot; is maybe a bit reductive, but calling someone a &quot;woman&#039;s genitals&quot; is deadly? Maybe it&#039;s because those who use these words believe deep down, that men are all right, are human, whatever faults they might have, but women are disgusting, evil, beyond the pale. Maybe I, on the other hand, think my own genitals are perfectly ok, and I don&#039;t want to use a word denoting a part of my own body as the worst thing someone could be like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rididill: That&#8217;s not an inaccurate observation, as far as it goes, but the poit of <i>analysis</i> is to take that extra step and ask why? What societal beliefs cause the observed phenomenon? What power differentials might be in play here, and do we want to perpetuate them? &#8220;Prick&#8221; is a wimpy insult; &#8220;cunt&#8221; is an atom bomb. Why would it be that calling someone a &#8220;man&#8217;s genitals&#8221; is maybe a bit reductive, but calling someone a &#8220;woman&#8217;s genitals&#8221; is deadly? Maybe it&#8217;s because those who use these words believe deep down, that men are all right, are human, whatever faults they might have, but women are disgusting, evil, beyond the pale. Maybe I, on the other hand, think my own genitals are perfectly ok, and I don&#8217;t want to use a word denoting a part of my own body as the worst thing someone could be like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rididill</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-179730</link>
		<dc:creator>Rididill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-179730</guid>
		<description>i know it&#039;s like 2 years later so no one will care, but here are my thoughts on the word cunt.

Prick, dick and cock are crappy insults. For someone who is foolish, irritating, and assholish. Cunt is a BADASS insult! Pricks, dicks and cocks may be mildly annoying, but they are ten a penny. They are nothing. They cannot even piss off with success and conviction. Cunt at least has some fucking teeth! (he he) Dicks are laughable. Cunts are the bond villain of the genitally-centred insults. It also has a nice abrupt sound akin to verbally stabbing someone in the face. that shit has power. male genital centred insults are just useless little ballsacks. 

I know many will not agree with me, and I do not use the word lightly. but there it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know it&#8217;s like 2 years later so no one will care, but here are my thoughts on the word cunt.</p>
<p>Prick, dick and cock are crappy insults. For someone who is foolish, irritating, and assholish. Cunt is a BADASS insult! Pricks, dicks and cocks may be mildly annoying, but they are ten a penny. They are nothing. They cannot even piss off with success and conviction. Cunt at least has some fucking teeth! (he he) Dicks are laughable. Cunts are the bond villain of the genitally-centred insults. It also has a nice abrupt sound akin to verbally stabbing someone in the face. that shit has power. male genital centred insults are just useless little ballsacks. </p>
<p>I know many will not agree with me, and I do not use the word lightly. but there it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xochitl</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-150298</link>
		<dc:creator>xochitl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-150298</guid>
		<description>&quot;Are we really only as united as the language we use reflects? What happened to ‘reclaiming’ the word and USING IT OURSELVES to take back the ‘power’ of the insult? ‘We’re here; we’re queer’ ring a bell?&quot;

Yeah, but that is not the context in which it was used here. It was obviously not meant as a compliment, and therefore served to reinforce  the power of the insult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are we really only as united as the language we use reflects? What happened to ‘reclaiming’ the word and USING IT OURSELVES to take back the ‘power’ of the insult? ‘We’re here; we’re queer’ ring a bell?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, but that is not the context in which it was used here. It was obviously not meant as a compliment, and therefore served to reinforce  the power of the insult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polly sytrene</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-150278</link>
		<dc:creator>polly sytrene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-150278</guid>
		<description>I concur with m&#039;learned friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with m&#8217;learned friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smellerella</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-150276</link>
		<dc:creator>smellerella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-150276</guid>
		<description>Jill

I am another lurker who has never posted a comment but who regularly refers wayward women and girls to IBTP when they are feeling at a loss and confused about the current state of affairs. When I say, &#039;IBTP&#039;, they say, &#039;huh?&#039;. So, I inform them about the wonderful online realm of IBTP where, it seems, most people &#039;get it&#039; and they can find solace.

However, there is a small part of me that feels somehow the nasties won this round. That the inner-critics that constitute internalized patriarchy were hard at work during the &#039;cuntalina episode&#039; and these inner-critics spewed forth that which had been ingrained in them - using the word &#039;cunt&#039; is the lowest of the low. 

I would argue that MEN decided that being referred to as part of a woman&#039;s anatomy is insulting; I don&#039;t believe that it is - I think my parts are FABULOUS. 

How is it that a group so enlightened, as the Blametariat, can FALL DOWN so quickly due to language. Are we really only as united as the language we use reflects? What happened to &#039;reclaiming&#039; the word and USING IT OURSELVES to take back the &#039;power&#039; of the insult? &#039;We&#039;re here; we&#039;re queer&#039; ring a bell?

Regardless, I&#039;m glad you are continuing to post and encourage you to keep doing WHAT YOU WANT - it&#039;s your damn blog after all. Screw the critics and never write for love; write for yourself. If nature crap is where you&#039;re at, super; I&#039;m still reading and will continue to do so as I have for the last 3 years. 

Warmest wishes from a faithful Canadian Cuntalina!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill</p>
<p>I am another lurker who has never posted a comment but who regularly refers wayward women and girls to IBTP when they are feeling at a loss and confused about the current state of affairs. When I say, &#8216;IBTP&#8217;, they say, &#8216;huh?&#8217;. So, I inform them about the wonderful online realm of IBTP where, it seems, most people &#8216;get it&#8217; and they can find solace.</p>
<p>However, there is a small part of me that feels somehow the nasties won this round. That the inner-critics that constitute internalized patriarchy were hard at work during the &#8216;cuntalina episode&#8217; and these inner-critics spewed forth that which had been ingrained in them &#8211; using the word &#8216;cunt&#8217; is the lowest of the low. </p>
<p>I would argue that MEN decided that being referred to as part of a woman&#8217;s anatomy is insulting; I don&#8217;t believe that it is &#8211; I think my parts are FABULOUS. </p>
<p>How is it that a group so enlightened, as the Blametariat, can FALL DOWN so quickly due to language. Are we really only as united as the language we use reflects? What happened to &#8216;reclaiming&#8217; the word and USING IT OURSELVES to take back the &#8216;power&#8217; of the insult? &#8216;We&#8217;re here; we&#8217;re queer&#8217; ring a bell?</p>
<p>Regardless, I&#8217;m glad you are continuing to post and encourage you to keep doing WHAT YOU WANT &#8211; it&#8217;s your damn blog after all. Screw the critics and never write for love; write for yourself. If nature crap is where you&#8217;re at, super; I&#8217;m still reading and will continue to do so as I have for the last 3 years. </p>
<p>Warmest wishes from a faithful Canadian Cuntalina!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polly sytrene</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-150266</link>
		<dc:creator>polly sytrene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-150266</guid>
		<description>And that&#039;s against some very stiff competition, because there&#039;s a helluva lot of heartwarming nature crap out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s against some very stiff competition, because there&#8217;s a helluva lot of heartwarming nature crap out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nolabelfits</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-150265</link>
		<dc:creator>Nolabelfits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-150265</guid>
		<description>This blog saved my sanity. All of it, including the hearwarming nature crap. I say Jill deserves a break. Coming up with fresh stuff on a daily basis is demanding, one would think. You know that this blog is going to have the best written and most humorous  heartwarming nature crap anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog saved my sanity. All of it, including the hearwarming nature crap. I say Jill deserves a break. Coming up with fresh stuff on a daily basis is demanding, one would think. You know that this blog is going to have the best written and most humorous  heartwarming nature crap anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tle</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-150179</link>
		<dc:creator>tle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-150179</guid>
		<description>Auntie:  I found you earlier this year, and immediately added you to my bookmarks. I finally read the comments from the post in which you used the &quot;C-alina word,&quot; and was fascinated that one of the people giving you the most crap for using teh-menz-worst-insult-against-the-noble-female has the word &quot;babe&quot; included as part of her on-line identity.  Huh?  

The basic C word is one I have used, albeit sparingly, in situations where no other will do.  While I do more than my share of blaming, I simply cannot come to terms with the idea that having scary female parts absolves a person from using her brain and exercising her free will.  Like the majority of the human race is suffering at all times from Stockholm syndrome and therefore each individual member of that majority is not responsible if she is narrow-minded, nasty, hypocritical and a general waste of human flesh.  Not buying it, sorry.  I really liked the comment from  wendyann.  She said it very well.

While I appreciate your writing style no matter what the subject, I do hope you do not concentrate only on the life of domestic animals and Texas vermin.  I think there are many of us who mostly lurk, and perhaps do not express our deep gratitude for your keen mind and independent thought, served up to us through the miracle of the intertubes on a regular basis, often enough to counteract the naysayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Auntie:  I found you earlier this year, and immediately added you to my bookmarks. I finally read the comments from the post in which you used the &#8220;C-alina word,&#8221; and was fascinated that one of the people giving you the most crap for using teh-menz-worst-insult-against-the-noble-female has the word &#8220;babe&#8221; included as part of her on-line identity.  Huh?  </p>
<p>The basic C word is one I have used, albeit sparingly, in situations where no other will do.  While I do more than my share of blaming, I simply cannot come to terms with the idea that having scary female parts absolves a person from using her brain and exercising her free will.  Like the majority of the human race is suffering at all times from Stockholm syndrome and therefore each individual member of that majority is not responsible if she is narrow-minded, nasty, hypocritical and a general waste of human flesh.  Not buying it, sorry.  I really liked the comment from  wendyann.  She said it very well.</p>
<p>While I appreciate your writing style no matter what the subject, I do hope you do not concentrate only on the life of domestic animals and Texas vermin.  I think there are many of us who mostly lurk, and perhaps do not express our deep gratitude for your keen mind and independent thought, served up to us through the miracle of the intertubes on a regular basis, often enough to counteract the naysayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomecat</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-149970</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-149970</guid>
		<description>Another, probably unwanted, voice here to say that I am profoundly grateful for this blog.  IBTP was the first place I found in my 4+ decades, that verbalized, analyzed and clarified the conflicting messages I received from my own head and from society at large.  

Once I stumbled across a single post here, I immediately went back and voraciously consumed the archives for weeks.  Unlike some of your readers, I value the commentariat immensely.  Even the comments that piss me off, because they all help to organize my thoughts and force me to rethink my positions on everything--almost as much as your posts do.  

Anyway, to make a short comment long; glad to hear you&#039;re sticking around--in whatever form you choose.  And thank you for all you&#039;ve done already.  A voice as strong, intelligent and witty as yours is a welcome diversion to even the worst of my days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another, probably unwanted, voice here to say that I am profoundly grateful for this blog.  IBTP was the first place I found in my 4+ decades, that verbalized, analyzed and clarified the conflicting messages I received from my own head and from society at large.  </p>
<p>Once I stumbled across a single post here, I immediately went back and voraciously consumed the archives for weeks.  Unlike some of your readers, I value the commentariat immensely.  Even the comments that piss me off, because they all help to organize my thoughts and force me to rethink my positions on everything&#8211;almost as much as your posts do.  </p>
<p>Anyway, to make a short comment long; glad to hear you&#8217;re sticking around&#8211;in whatever form you choose.  And thank you for all you&#8217;ve done already.  A voice as strong, intelligent and witty as yours is a welcome diversion to even the worst of my days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily (fmrly, the Baboon)</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/05/31/spinster-auntism-lives/#comment-149966</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily (fmrly, the Baboon)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=2445#comment-149966</guid>
		<description>I feel quite Thrilled to be a reader during this moment of transition. That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel quite Thrilled to be a reader during this moment of transition. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

