Monthly Archive for May, 2009

Page 3 of 3

Spinster aunt suffers bilious post-Mother’s Day aftermath

Mother's Day 2009

Mother’s Day Brunch Buffet ‘09: How weak are the University of Texas Golf Club mimosas? I had to give the kid like 4 of’em before she would consent to pose with cherry-eyes. Photo by Tidy Faster.

Another Mother’s Day come and gone. It seems like only yesterday.

It will cause no one’s world to come crashing down around them when I aver that Mother’s Day is like a poke in the lobe with a prickly probe. It’s insipid and sentimental and highlights like no other fake holiday the line of demarcation between the Judeo-Christian heterosexes.

O, Mother dear! We love you so much we can only express it through this Hallmark card! Oh, and where are our clean socks?

And it practically goes without saying that any event involving a mandatory brunch buffet deserves the stink-eye.

Why does it always have to be a brunch buffet? Brunch is an aberrant, grotesquely heavy meal, and the buffet is the worst mediocre-food-delivery-system ever invented. Buffets! They’re worse than cafeterias! Not only do you have to crowd up for the grub like a waif in a Victorian orphanage, but the potential pathogen load multiplies exponentially when there are no dedicated servers dishing the crap out. Anybody might sneeze up a loogey into the vat of Chicken Core D’onbloo, and who’d be the wiser? Mysterious food items with heavy sauces hardening in chafing dishes, 10-year-old boys scooping up the crab claws with their bare hands, horrid mixtures of orange juice concentrate and warmish $5 Asti Spumante with maraschino cherries — euruhhgh. I mean it.

It is indicative of the low value placed on American motherhood that Mother’s Day is the only fake holiday where crappy, artery-clogging, self-service food, “complimentary” cheap mimosas, and a few brown-edged roses are considered the ultimate expression of filial gratitude.

Spinster aunt attaches clothespin to nose

Bert, skunked

Bert, skunked

When you look up heartwarming in a dictionary, if it is a good nature-crap dictionary, it will say, “The sense of satisfaction and well-being emanating from a golden retriever who has just been skunked and has dashed forthwith into your house to rub his entire body on the side of your bed.”

Spinster aunt perceives flaw in PBS documentary

Mourning dove

The mournfulness of the mourning dove is exceptionally heartwarming. Spinster HQ is lousy with’em at the moment. They go “The end is near, near, near.”

Last night’s Frontline documentary on human sex trafficking — “Sex Slaves,” originally broadcast in 2005 — clawed at every cranny of the obstreperal lobe. Definitely not heartwarming.

I’ll skip the basics, assuming that the advanced blamer is acquainted with the mechanics of human trafficking, because I wish to register a complaint. Well, several complaints. Actually, it’s one large complaint upon which a few dangling dingleberry complaints depend.

The large complaint is that the film is itself sexploitational. It is without question voyeuristic, and at times it borders on actual pornography. And why shouldn’t it? Porn has been normalized into a legitimate art form.

Naturally, people who watch PBS believe themselves to be above that sort of thing, but they still need a reason to watch a show about women’s oppression. They might come away with a few useless “facts,” but these must be delivered from within a framework of entertainment. And entertainment, in 2009, is sex and melodrama. Thus, the “Sex Slaves” teaser:

“An undercover journey deep into the world of sex trafficking, following one man determined to rescue his wife — kidnapped and sold into the global sex trade.”

A murder of spinster aunts could charter a yacht, order a vat of guac and a barrel of margs, and ruminate on the Lido Deck all day long, but we’d never come up with a more formulaical Chivalric plot than that. Are you kidding me? Evil villains, a damsel in distress whose virtue is at stake, and a gallant champion who literally rescues her? Oh, and the damsel is 4 months pregnant. Add sentimental fetus-anxiety bonus points.

A kind of grainy prurience attends nearly every sequence of footage. The B-roll street scenes are shot according to a familiar sexploitation formula: the self-consciously verité-esque camera singles out a pair of comely hips encased in sexy jeans, lingers lustily, and finally pans up to reveal the whole woman as a hottie. Meanwhile, the authoritative male voiceover — the disembodied Voice of God — masks this sleazy voyeurism with academic gravitas. When he describes Ukraine as Eastern Europe’s ground zero for “beautiful women,” and the visual is a taut young Ukrainian midriff, it is meant to be accepted as scientific fact. After all, although the qualitative differences between the two are few, this is a documentary, not an episode of “Law & Order: Mutilated Women Unit.” But the greasy ease with which the documentarist’s camera violates women who are just walking down the street minding their own beeswax is an invocation of the global accords governing fair use of women: all females are de facto sex objects, and hot girls — shots of women who aren’t Beauty2K-compliant didn’t make the final cut — are vulnerable sex slaves waiting to happen.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: DudeAmerica just can’t resist hot young prostituted Russians!

Sure, the producers are against human trafficking. Who isn’t? But can we please have a film about it that doesn’t parrot asinine patriarchal narratives about helpless damsels and male valor, that doesn’t itself exploit the very women whose exploitation it purports to abhor, that does more than just hint at some vague notion of women’s “poverty” as the reason for human trafficking? The rapists who abuse all the women in this film, where are they? Where’s the outrage over the notion that “the sex trade” is a “multi-billion dollar industry,” not because Ukrainian women are poor, but because the world is full of assholes who will pay to rape them? Just once I’d like to see somebody — anybody — point out that “the sex trade,” i.e. rape slavery, is not a consequence of women’s desperation and a few unscrupulous pimps. It is the consequence of a social order based on the fetishization of dominance.

Spinster aunt finally makes use of abandoned Flickr account

Indigo bunting, dead
This indigo bunting perished dramatically in a picture window mishap. Note the excellent iridescent turquoise feathers on her shoulders.

Sure, demand is as infinitesimal as it is small, but that hasn’t stopped me from sticking a big clump of my most award-nominated heartwarming nature crap photos up on Flickr. I am enbiggening the collection daily, drawing from the 5872 or so hottt pixxx I’ve snapped since moving back to bug-infested Austin right after the Korean War. I should’ve done this long ago.

“So,” said Stingray, eyeballing a heartwarming photo of a dead bunting, “you think posting to Flickr will keep this shit from taking over your blog?”

I said I didn’t know for sure, but that in any event my spring fever can’t last forever. Forget about posting heartwarming nature crap on a patriarchy-blaming blog; soon it’ll be too hot here in Rattlesnake to do anything but lie in an ice bath all day, moaning faintly.

I also have a Twisty Twitter account. Maybe I’m a victim of the generation gap, but I don’t really understand Twitter. No matter; it turns out I never remember to tweet anyway.

Spinster aunt recommends intellectual busywork as countermeasure against occupying forces

Milkweed bugs on antelope horn
Heatwarming milkweed bugs stick their butts together on a clump of antelope horn.

Everyone is always asking me how to smash patriarchy.

“It’s all well and good,” they say, “this vague, spinster auntly consciousness-raising crap in the Age of Funfeminism and Liberal Dudes, but where’s the practical solution?”

Well, I sure as hell don’t know. Nothing I’ve tried so far has worked, with the possible and imperfect exception of dropping out of society.

Dropping out of society is not a flawless gambit, to be sure. The patriarchy-smashing is localized to one’s immediate sphere of influence, and is entirely illusory, regardless of the depth to which one drops. You may be so far off the map that only the mosquitoes can find you, but Dude Nation, that icky subsidiary of the megatheocorporatocracy, still owns the map, confounding at every turn the efforts of spinster aunts who just want a quiet life without quite so many assholes in it.

You might, for example, find in your bathroom a paperback entitled Emergency by New York Times Bestselling Author Neil Strauss, who “takes us on a white-knuckled journey through America’s heart of darkness as he scrambles to escape the system.” You might thumb through it because, what a coincidence, you’re scrambling to escape the system too, and besides there’s nothing else to read in there except the Christmas catalog from Dover Saddlery. In so thumbing, you might come across this paragraph:

In the Golestan Shopping Center, women wrapped in burkas shopped for designer jewelry. Though the only skin showing was the front of their faces peering out from beneath black chadors, at least one in twenty of those faces had a bandaged nose from recent plastic surgery. My cab driver later told me that Iran was the world capital of nose jobs, proving that even in a culture like this, a woman’s vanity could not be kept down.”

Though, as a New York Times Bestselling Author, Neil Strauss ought to be on top of the world and above such things, he nevertheless feels it necessary to prove something unpleasant about women as a class.* He isn’t about to let the prooflessness of his argument keep him from doing it. And there you are, reading it. Thus has a misogynist dickwad wormed its way into your private bathroom.

Are you about to say, “Twisty, you dumbass, you were just asking for it, picking up a book written by a New York Times Bestselling Author”?

Don’t say it! Consider the implications!

Because no, I wasn’t just asking to feast my eyes upon that offensive (and poorly written) statement. The thought that it might amuse me to read some dude’s pronouncements on the inferiority of women never even entered my lobe. Like any rational human, the spinster aunt is seldom compelled to seek out abuse. Particularly when in the bathroom. But ours is a society wherein one does not have a reasonable expectation of freedom from bigotry, sexism, exploitation, and knobbery, on the grid or off, on the toilet or off.

Which is why I can only suggest an intellectual fortress approach to coping with membership in an oppressed class. It goes like this:

You know that thing you really enjoy doing? The thing that gives you the illusion that your life has meaning? With me, it’s sitting around looking at bugs with their butts stuck together. With you, it’s probably weaving god’s eyes out of rainbow yarn or something. Well, whatever it is, do it all the time, and with a sort of vengeance. Because the more you focus your lobe on shit that has actual philosophic value, the fewer the lobal chinks through which New York Times Bestselling Authors can slither.

__________________________
* New York Times Bestselling Author Neil Strauss’s other works include Jenna Jameson’s autobiography, the seminal How To Make Love Like a Porn Star, proving that New York Times Bestselling Author Neil Strauss is an asshole. The only “system” he wants to escape is some imaginary one where women have an iota of human dignity.

Western Painted Turtle of the Week (and some lite blaming)

turtle_western_painted

The Western painted is the state turtle of Colorado. This one was 7 or 8 inches long and every bit as heartwarming as it looks.

Some anonymous benefactor has apparently philanthropized millions to 14 colleges, all of which are run by women, with the proviso that the money be used for scholarships for women and minorities. The collegiate world is ablaze with speculation and incredulity. Who could have been so insane as to donate cash to fund women’s education? NPR reporter Claudio Sanchez wonders whether any colleges run by men would ever get any money.

No, Claudio. I’m afraid men are shit out of luck. It’s the Law of Conservation of Human Dignity, which states that, within a social order based on dominance and submission, the total amount of human dignity must remain constant. In other words, whenever women are treated with an iota of decency, a reciprocal diminishment of men’s humanity must obtain.

A consequence of this law is that whenever a girl gets to kick a soccer ball, somewhere a boy will be made to play with Barbies. Whenever a woman exercises sovereignty over the contents of her internal organs, somewhere a man will have to wear a frumpy 19th century calico dress and do the family laundry by hand. Whenever a woman publishes a paper on particle physics, somewhere a man will be waterboarded for a week before being shot by a firing squad of hairy humorless feminists. Etc. Ergo, the fact that a mysterious benefactor has given a few bucks to women’s education means that no colleges run by men will ever get any money ever again.

Meet the beetles

Celer crab spider lurking in the rose vervain

Celer crab spider lurking in the rose vervain

UPDATE: The flowers pictured above were originally misidentified by the Spinster Vegetation Dept. as phlox. They are, obviously, rose vervain. We blame a crappy Wildflowers-at-a-Glance laminated pocket guide. But we do not apologize for any inconvenience. It is hard to imagine anyone being inconvenienced by a mistake on a heartwarming nature crap blog.

A ridiculous heterogeneity of flora has sprouted up almost overnight here at the rancho. So spectacular is the tableau that I have to wipe a heartwarmed tear from the Twisty eye whenever I leave the bunkhouse. Floral spectacularity, like certain airs in minor keys played on violins, is the opiate of the obstreperal lobe. So it can be somewhat startling, when you sproing across a field to stick your nose in a flower, to discover that the object of your nostalgic spasm is full of bugs.

Most of the flowers around here are full of bugs. It turns out that the only flowers that aren’t full of bugs are the ones you pay a dollar a stem for at the grocery store.

Flower scarabs yukking it up in a prickly pear

Flower scarabs yukking it up in a prickly pear

Spinster aunt harkens to call of the wild

Eastern phoebe nest in the roof of the Spinster motor pool garage. My golden retriever Bert contributed a significant percentage of the building materials.

Eastern phoebe nest in the roof of the Spinster motor pool garage. My golden retriever Bert contributed a significant percentage of the building materials.

Uncle!

You saw it coming. It is no longer possible to resist the siren call of the drunken wood-nymphs on the bunkhouse stoop. Actually, they’re not so much calling as banging on the door and hollering. “Hey, get your ass out here and check out this awesome fungus! Bring beer!” is pretty much the refrain.

“Can’t it wait,” I ask, “until I’ve finished writing another essay on the perniciosity of the sexbot continuum?”

“Do not toy with us. This fungus isn’t going to appreciate itself!” is the answer. “And what the hell is a sexbot continuum? And where the hell is our beer?”

So, until spring subsides, I’ll be out traipsing over hill and dale, shoving the odd rock into my pocket, picking minuscule pink flowers, listening to cricket frogs, dodging nettles, lingering on riverbanks, looking at shit through binoculars, waiting for the Eastern phoebe eggs to hatch, and more or less reveling ceaselessly in the divers attractions on offer by the non-human world.

Even if all this happy-go-lucky traipsing did not disincline the spinster aunt toward the unpleasant business of patriarchy blaming, it would leave little time for it. I’ll still be posting, but I’m afraid it will be mostly heart-warming nature crap for a while. Today, for example, I’ll be shoveling a rank vulture corpse into a feed bag and dumping it somewhere where my golden retriever Bert can’t get at it. Then I’m going to watch it decompose.

Rotting dead vulture, with flies.

Rotting dead vulture, with flies.

I am aware that decomposing vultures offer little in the way of feminist ideology, and may not meet the blamer’s daily requirements. It can’t be helped. Undoubtedly there is a way to blame the patriarchy for a dead vulture, but frankly, I don’t much feel like it.

I will say this, however. The compulsion to fart around in the country looking at bugs and flowers, and lapse into a dreamy poetical stupor, and, you know, connect with nature and shit, is pretty strong, but that’s only half of my problem. I am also compelled to identify, to catalog and collect and compile and quantify and qualify. So I’m stuck with these damned field guides.

I’ve curled the Twisty lip at field guides before; their purported scientific objectivity masks a deeply ingrained systemic misogyny. Take the patriarchal notion of the male as the default, no matter what the species. Especially when it comes to birds, the females of which are always described in terms of the males. Check out the shamelessly biased language in this description of the summer tanager in Birds of North America Online:

“Some females sing, but song is poor rendition of male song: slurred subfigures, brief (if any) pause between subfigures, and short overall duration.”

There are two sound clips of male summer tanager on the website, but the drab old female is so untalented and derivative that nobody has bothered to record her. She should just shut up and sit on the eggs, already.

This sex bias does nothing but ensmallen the ornithological horizon. Was that yellowish bird I heard this morning a summer tanager? I’ll never know, because birdly schmucks seem to think it’s a great idea to ignore and even disparage half the constituents of the species.