<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spinster aunt reads amateur op-ed piece</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:41:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jezebella</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-157236</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezebella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-157236</guid>
		<description>Feminist Mafia? UN taken over by feminists? Excellent news indeed!  Do we have pink helicopters yet?  And why haven&#039;t I been recruited?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feminist Mafia? UN taken over by feminists? Excellent news indeed!  Do we have pink helicopters yet?  And why haven&#8217;t I been recruited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roesmoker</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-157227</link>
		<dc:creator>roesmoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-157227</guid>
		<description>On the stellar Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Social Sciences Since You Didn&#039;t Bother To Pay Attention in Elementary School site, one &quot;Doodlebugjim&quot; wrote: &quot;Feminism pretty much has taken over already&quot; (that&#039;s news to us! Why don&#039;t you mansplain to us how we have secretly taken over the world?) and he helpfully obliges: &quot;Almost nobody realises things like
1/ feminists are trying to close women’s prisons and turn them into men’s
2/ the UN are helping to promote anti-male laws worldwide.
3/ feminism is secretly promoted in China and India using soap operas. This is also done via the UN.&quot;

Wait, what? I actually really want to see the soaps with subliminal feminist messages in China and India. And the UN is obviously controlled by the Feminist Mafia. That makes &lt;i&gt;tons&lt;/i&gt; of sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the stellar Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Social Sciences Since You Didn&#8217;t Bother To Pay Attention in Elementary School site, one &#8220;Doodlebugjim&#8221; wrote: &#8220;Feminism pretty much has taken over already&#8221; (that&#8217;s news to us! Why don&#8217;t you mansplain to us how we have secretly taken over the world?) and he helpfully obliges: &#8220;Almost nobody realises things like<br />
1/ feminists are trying to close women’s prisons and turn them into men’s<br />
2/ the UN are helping to promote anti-male laws worldwide.<br />
3/ feminism is secretly promoted in China and India using soap operas. This is also done via the UN.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait, what? I actually really want to see the soaps with subliminal feminist messages in China and India. And the UN is obviously controlled by the Feminist Mafia. That makes <i>tons</i> of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-156826</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-156826</guid>
		<description>The moistness of one daddy-dude&#039;s angel tears seemed an association worth noting in this thread, Hedgepig, but yes, this whole amazing blog could be subsumed topically under the kin/gender group dynamics of ethnicity and sex-class submission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The moistness of one daddy-dude&#8217;s angel tears seemed an association worth noting in this thread, Hedgepig, but yes, this whole amazing blog could be subsumed topically under the kin/gender group dynamics of ethnicity and sex-class submission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedgepig</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-156809</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedgepig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-156809</guid>
		<description>Jan, (this response to your comments above probably belongs over on the ethnicity discussion thread) one of the most successful characteristics of patriarchy is its insistence that women must feel greater loyalty/attachment/love etc for people in their kin group (which is of course riddled with males) than they feel for people in their gender group. That&#039;s why the whole concept of the ethnic group serves patriarchy so well. And you&#039;re so right about Freud, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan, (this response to your comments above probably belongs over on the ethnicity discussion thread) one of the most successful characteristics of patriarchy is its insistence that women must feel greater loyalty/attachment/love etc for people in their kin group (which is of course riddled with males) than they feel for people in their gender group. That&#8217;s why the whole concept of the ethnic group serves patriarchy so well. And you&#8217;re so right about Freud, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-156801</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-156801</guid>
		<description>that was the funniest wind-up to the best punchline since I don&#039;t know what.  I might have to read it every day for a week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that was the funniest wind-up to the best punchline since I don&#8217;t know what.  I might have to read it every day for a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fannie</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-156776</link>
		<dc:creator>fannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-156776</guid>
		<description>&quot;he himself, most assuredly, &#039;won’t be joining any feminist group such as the National Organization for Women, and certainly [not] Planned Parenthood, since I am a conservative and pro-life.&#039;&quot;


What&#039;s that smell?  I think an angel just farted in here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;he himself, most assuredly, &#8216;won’t be joining any feminist group such as the National Organization for Women, and certainly [not] Planned Parenthood, since I am a conservative and pro-life.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that smell?  I think an angel just farted in here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-156677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-156677</guid>
		<description>&quot;... socially set by men [correction to my post language that said &quot;my men&quot;].  There are no real &quot;Freudian slips,&quot; Freud having been a fraud and hater when it comes to women, but it is true that &quot;my men&quot; is how women as a gender class have been socialized to fantasize in an ego-boosting way about the men who oppress them.  Naming it is part of blaming.  Hurt “by” men, who are never &quot;my&quot; guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; socially set by men [correction to my post language that said "my men"].  There are no real &#8220;Freudian slips,&#8221; Freud having been a fraud and hater when it comes to women, but it is true that &#8220;my men&#8221; is how women as a gender class have been socialized to fantasize in an ego-boosting way about the men who oppress them.  Naming it is part of blaming.  Hurt “by” men, who are never &#8220;my&#8221; guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-156676</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-156676</guid>
		<description>Woman-centric tribal days behind us and the patriarchy still before us, just for today I&#039;ve given up on my own kind (women).  And moist angel tears, spare me.   But a tribe of womankind would be nice. 

Meanwhile, there&#039;s personal integrity.  Not so comforting when things are tough.  There, nonetheless.  

Today I withdrew from a once beloved organization (70% women) in which most of the women fawn over the men&#039;s opinions with a level of caring never extended to themselves as women or to other women.  Years ago I eschewed any voluntary contact with men, none of whom have the capacity for friendship with any woman unwilling to sacrifice some of her autonomy on his male-entitlement spire. 

Google &quot;bondage photos&quot; one night and see the truth of what men as a gender class do to some women and want to do to the rest.  The converted power tools are relatively new to the genre and give new meaning to the term &quot;bloody invasion.&quot; Those who had no moon blood of their own in the year&#039;s 13 lunar cycles have enacted a cruel vengeance against women. 

Today I quit lending my strength to women who honor men over women. What will become of me, of any of us who do this without a trust fund or farm lands to sustain us under the ownership requirements socially set my men?   Not asking for crying angels but for greater power.  Whatever Goddesses There Be, Help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woman-centric tribal days behind us and the patriarchy still before us, just for today I&#8217;ve given up on my own kind (women).  And moist angel tears, spare me.   But a tribe of womankind would be nice. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, there&#8217;s personal integrity.  Not so comforting when things are tough.  There, nonetheless.  </p>
<p>Today I withdrew from a once beloved organization (70% women) in which most of the women fawn over the men&#8217;s opinions with a level of caring never extended to themselves as women or to other women.  Years ago I eschewed any voluntary contact with men, none of whom have the capacity for friendship with any woman unwilling to sacrifice some of her autonomy on his male-entitlement spire. </p>
<p>Google &#8220;bondage photos&#8221; one night and see the truth of what men as a gender class do to some women and want to do to the rest.  The converted power tools are relatively new to the genre and give new meaning to the term &#8220;bloody invasion.&#8221; Those who had no moon blood of their own in the year&#8217;s 13 lunar cycles have enacted a cruel vengeance against women. </p>
<p>Today I quit lending my strength to women who honor men over women. What will become of me, of any of us who do this without a trust fund or farm lands to sustain us under the ownership requirements socially set my men?   Not asking for crying angels but for greater power.  Whatever Goddesses There Be, Help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-156658</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-156658</guid>
		<description>Amananta succinctly describes the last conversations I endured with some male friends before dropping that dead weight from my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amananta succinctly describes the last conversations I endured with some male friends before dropping that dead weight from my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amananta</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2009/11/28/spinster-aunt-reads-amateur-op-ed-piece/#comment-156657</link>
		<dc:creator>Amananta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3168#comment-156657</guid>
		<description>&quot;The sex-based pay disparity is, and has been for 40 years, the single most highly publicized “feminist” talking point; “domestic violence” is the central theme of about 47 popular TV cop dramas, 47 more popular TV true crime shows, all local newspapers, and Oprah&quot;

Sadly this IS news to many men (and some women!).  Why?  Because they have the right to ignore it.  It blows the mind how many times I have to actually argue these points with clueless patriarchy-bots who otherwise seem to have a generally good grasp on reality.  Even when they do admit women are paid less, they claim its their own fault for &quot;choosing&quot; to work part-time or quit entirely for a few years to take care of aging/ill/infant family members (as though there were no societal pressure on women to do all the unpaid work in the world - and which is beside the point anyway as the pay gap is present even between fully employed professional women with the same degree of experience and education as men); or for &quot;not leaving&quot;, oh and women can be verbally abusive you know, even though they aren&#039;t killing and shooting their husbands on a daily basis and even though men have perfectly capable centers of speech with which they can and do verbally abuse the wives and girlfriends they are ALSO beating.  
They will then go on to tell you it&#039;s all balanced out by/the real problem is the men unfairly lose their children after divorce and have to pay child support to a bad mommy whore figure even though they aren&#039;t getting to screw her anymore!  (Even though an extensive study found this also is completely untrue, even though, if anything, the authors admitted they expected to find a result opposite of what they found.)
Sometimes, if you have the patience and energy to fight your way through all of this crap, you can get a half-hearted admission that back-alley rape by a stranger of an underage girl is wrong BUT of course her parents should have been watching her better/what was she doing there anyway/why hadn&#039;t someone taken her to a self-defense class?

We have a long way to go, baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The sex-based pay disparity is, and has been for 40 years, the single most highly publicized “feminist” talking point; “domestic violence” is the central theme of about 47 popular TV cop dramas, 47 more popular TV true crime shows, all local newspapers, and Oprah&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly this IS news to many men (and some women!).  Why?  Because they have the right to ignore it.  It blows the mind how many times I have to actually argue these points with clueless patriarchy-bots who otherwise seem to have a generally good grasp on reality.  Even when they do admit women are paid less, they claim its their own fault for &#8220;choosing&#8221; to work part-time or quit entirely for a few years to take care of aging/ill/infant family members (as though there were no societal pressure on women to do all the unpaid work in the world &#8211; and which is beside the point anyway as the pay gap is present even between fully employed professional women with the same degree of experience and education as men); or for &#8220;not leaving&#8221;, oh and women can be verbally abusive you know, even though they aren&#8217;t killing and shooting their husbands on a daily basis and even though men have perfectly capable centers of speech with which they can and do verbally abuse the wives and girlfriends they are ALSO beating.<br />
They will then go on to tell you it&#8217;s all balanced out by/the real problem is the men unfairly lose their children after divorce and have to pay child support to a bad mommy whore figure even though they aren&#8217;t getting to screw her anymore!  (Even though an extensive study found this also is completely untrue, even though, if anything, the authors admitted they expected to find a result opposite of what they found.)<br />
Sometimes, if you have the patience and energy to fight your way through all of this crap, you can get a half-hearted admission that back-alley rape by a stranger of an underage girl is wrong BUT of course her parents should have been watching her better/what was she doing there anyway/why hadn&#8217;t someone taken her to a self-defense class?</p>
<p>We have a long way to go, baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
