<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case for flip-flops and flowing robes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kiuku</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-162197</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiuku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-162197</guid>
		<description>Clothing should provide a function and be comfortable, above all things. It displays status. They say high heels make a come back, and especially debilitating high heels become popular during times of economic hardship (meaning women are even worse off than usual). 

What&#039;s kind of interesting is that wedding dresses, and dresses from the victorian, edwardian, and also modern dresses make women look like insects. Women in modern art also mimic the shape of insects, by exaggerating the waist and crossing the legs.

I think maybe we just need some insecticide around here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clothing should provide a function and be comfortable, above all things. It displays status. They say high heels make a come back, and especially debilitating high heels become popular during times of economic hardship (meaning women are even worse off than usual). </p>
<p>What&#8217;s kind of interesting is that wedding dresses, and dresses from the victorian, edwardian, and also modern dresses make women look like insects. Women in modern art also mimic the shape of insects, by exaggerating the waist and crossing the legs.</p>
<p>I think maybe we just need some insecticide around here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezebella</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-162195</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezebella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 19:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-162195</guid>
		<description>I have often admired the salwar kameez as looking comfortable in most weather, and of course they are made with fantastic fabrics.  The &quot;cultural appropriation&quot; you mentioned is what has stopped me from wearing them on my own personal pasty white ass, because I fear I will look ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often admired the salwar kameez as looking comfortable in most weather, and of course they are made with fantastic fabrics.  The &#8220;cultural appropriation&#8221; you mentioned is what has stopped me from wearing them on my own personal pasty white ass, because I fear I will look ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayadevi</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-162189</link>
		<dc:creator>mayadevi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 13:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-162189</guid>
		<description>This is why I wear salwar kameez, which to me are the ideal clothing. They are tailored to you, not the other way around, they are adaptable to cold or hot weather, they can be worn by women of any age, they are more comfy than jeans, they are the right mix of dressy and casual to go almost anywhere. If anyone accuses me of cultural appropriation(I am white, though desi by marriage) they can kiss my pasty white ass. Western women&#039;s clothing sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I wear salwar kameez, which to me are the ideal clothing. They are tailored to you, not the other way around, they are adaptable to cold or hot weather, they can be worn by women of any age, they are more comfy than jeans, they are the right mix of dressy and casual to go almost anywhere. If anyone accuses me of cultural appropriation(I am white, though desi by marriage) they can kiss my pasty white ass. Western women&#8217;s clothing sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Morning After: Savage Vajazzling Edition - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-162033</link>
		<dc:creator>The Morning After: Savage Vajazzling Edition - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-162033</guid>
		<description>[...] Old, but good: I Blame the Patriarchy on men in wedding dresses: When I got a spam for “men in wedding dresses” this morning I thought, hell yeah! I sure do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Old, but good: I Blame the Patriarchy on men in wedding dresses: When I got a spam for “men in wedding dresses” this morning I thought, hell yeah! I sure do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speedbudget</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-161216</link>
		<dc:creator>speedbudget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-161216</guid>
		<description>&quot;Traditional&quot; wedding dresses are straight out of Victorian England.  So that should tell you something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Traditional&#8221; wedding dresses are straight out of Victorian England.  So that should tell you something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Andrist</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-161214</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Andrist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-161214</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Compelled to weigh in with my personal experiences in PatriarchyVille with male entitlement and expectations regarding my appearance.

See, I am solicited frequently by p0rnulated d00ds on various social networking sites. It&#039;s not worth my time to consider they might NOT be horny fucknozzles hoping to use me for their sexual gratification to the maximum possible extent. Hopeful, that I will exceed their sexual gratification expectations, put on the little black dress I&#039;m wearing in That Picture, get in my car, and meet them at their hotel / apartment / parents&#039; basement / etc. And ideally I will arrive drunk enough / rolling / thoughtfully slipped myself a roofie, etc so all they have to do is press play to gain access and use me for a meatsock.

Because pretty much every single one of them? Greets me with a remark expressing their approval of my aesthetic qualities / assessment that I am sexually satisfactory to them. In other words, complete strangers ping me out of nowhere because they see me as &quot;online&quot; to inform me that I&#039;m beautiful / hot / sexay (choose 1). They expect compliments and flattery (affirmation of commodity value) aimed at my primary characteristic (appearance) will please me. Maybe enough that I&#039;ll put out.

Except, this thing here -&gt; my appearance has no impact on me. I can&#039;t feel it, I can&#039;t see it. Unlike a limb, organ or my general health, if I were a cubist nightmare, nothing in my life would be different. Other than d00ds leaving me alone, I mean. 

No, a non-male&#039;s appearance is about THEM, what they see and the judging process to which they are entitled to subject and grade any and every non-male. It&#039;s a pass/fail thing and we are expected to be eager to receive their opinion. 

Complete random strangers. They could drop dead for all I care - and if I don&#039;t care whether they live or die, why the fiddly fuck would I care what they think of phantom characteristics they say I have? Being accosted with their uninvited op-ed is without a doubt the most ginormous demonstration of unbridled narcissism mathematically possible to wedge into a first impression. If strange men must randomly solicit me with flattery, PICK ANY OTHER TRAIT - my major, my cool page template, for fuck&#039;s sake my penmanship, just don&#039;t tell me I look good unless you want to be asked what the fuck that has to do with anything anywhere, least of all you.

On the rare occaision I even reply to any of these d00dly d00ds, I do so expressly for the unconventional entertainment value I find in consistently disappointing them with strictly platonic chat about feminism, programming, and my pet bunny Scissors. Ha.

Males who seek out Teh Hawtness don&#039;t differentiate a real live Womenthing from the Pornthing of their PornReality, and that&#039;s how you work the Pornthing. Whenever you wanna rub one out, pull her out, press play and be gratified.

...And I wear combat boots when I don&#039;t wear Chuckies. I have a pair of heels for job interviews, which have no backs so I can kick them off at every opportunity, because they mandate four preventative bandaids against their phenomenal blistering powers. If I want to dress up, I put on my combat boots and my little black dress, which is actually a cotton nightie with the power to work like a dress when paired with standard undergarments. Because it pleases me to do so. I win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Compelled to weigh in with my personal experiences in PatriarchyVille with male entitlement and expectations regarding my appearance.</p>
<p>See, I am solicited frequently by p0rnulated d00ds on various social networking sites. It&#8217;s not worth my time to consider they might NOT be horny fucknozzles hoping to use me for their sexual gratification to the maximum possible extent. Hopeful, that I will exceed their sexual gratification expectations, put on the little black dress I&#8217;m wearing in That Picture, get in my car, and meet them at their hotel / apartment / parents&#8217; basement / etc. And ideally I will arrive drunk enough / rolling / thoughtfully slipped myself a roofie, etc so all they have to do is press play to gain access and use me for a meatsock.</p>
<p>Because pretty much every single one of them? Greets me with a remark expressing their approval of my aesthetic qualities / assessment that I am sexually satisfactory to them. In other words, complete strangers ping me out of nowhere because they see me as &#8220;online&#8221; to inform me that I&#8217;m beautiful / hot / sexay (choose 1). They expect compliments and flattery (affirmation of commodity value) aimed at my primary characteristic (appearance) will please me. Maybe enough that I&#8217;ll put out.</p>
<p>Except, this thing here -&gt; my appearance has no impact on me. I can&#8217;t feel it, I can&#8217;t see it. Unlike a limb, organ or my general health, if I were a cubist nightmare, nothing in my life would be different. Other than d00ds leaving me alone, I mean. </p>
<p>No, a non-male&#8217;s appearance is about THEM, what they see and the judging process to which they are entitled to subject and grade any and every non-male. It&#8217;s a pass/fail thing and we are expected to be eager to receive their opinion. </p>
<p>Complete random strangers. They could drop dead for all I care &#8211; and if I don&#8217;t care whether they live or die, why the fiddly fuck would I care what they think of phantom characteristics they say I have? Being accosted with their uninvited op-ed is without a doubt the most ginormous demonstration of unbridled narcissism mathematically possible to wedge into a first impression. If strange men must randomly solicit me with flattery, PICK ANY OTHER TRAIT &#8211; my major, my cool page template, for fuck&#8217;s sake my penmanship, just don&#8217;t tell me I look good unless you want to be asked what the fuck that has to do with anything anywhere, least of all you.</p>
<p>On the rare occaision I even reply to any of these d00dly d00ds, I do so expressly for the unconventional entertainment value I find in consistently disappointing them with strictly platonic chat about feminism, programming, and my pet bunny Scissors. Ha.</p>
<p>Males who seek out Teh Hawtness don&#8217;t differentiate a real live Womenthing from the Pornthing of their PornReality, and that&#8217;s how you work the Pornthing. Whenever you wanna rub one out, pull her out, press play and be gratified.</p>
<p>&#8230;And I wear combat boots when I don&#8217;t wear Chuckies. I have a pair of heels for job interviews, which have no backs so I can kick them off at every opportunity, because they mandate four preventative bandaids against their phenomenal blistering powers. If I want to dress up, I put on my combat boots and my little black dress, which is actually a cotton nightie with the power to work like a dress when paired with standard undergarments. Because it pleases me to do so. I win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezebella</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-161210</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezebella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-161210</guid>
		<description>My mom&#039;s 1967 wedding dress was also a sort of faux-Chanel white suit.  No princess-poufs in sight. So, yeah, &quot;traditional&quot; wedding dresses are BS, as are the &quot;traditional&quot; diamond solitaire engagement ring.  It&#039;s all advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mom&#8217;s 1967 wedding dress was also a sort of faux-Chanel white suit.  No princess-poufs in sight. So, yeah, &#8220;traditional&#8221; wedding dresses are BS, as are the &#8220;traditional&#8221; diamond solitaire engagement ring.  It&#8217;s all advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ack, phooey</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-161207</link>
		<dc:creator>ack, phooey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-161207</guid>
		<description>Men, men, men, men. Most of the comments here are by men, and they are not the people I want to hear from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men, men, men, men. Most of the comments here are by men, and they are not the people I want to hear from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occasional lurker</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-161204</link>
		<dc:creator>Occasional lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-161204</guid>
		<description>Thanks, veganrampage; I too attended a women&#039;s college with a history of tenuring known sexual harassers and worse.  I just read my alma mater&#039;s annual report, and was disgusted, though not particularly surprised, to see a large photograph of one such prof who recently started a scholarship fund.  It would be nice to think that this is some sort of attempt to make up for his revolting past behavior, but somehow, I doubt it.  

Re: wedding dresses -- when my folks got married (early sixties) it was not unusual for the woman to wear a suit instead of a big, gauzy Bridezilla dress.  And that was not exactly a right-thinking era.  When will some women get a clue that what&#039;s being pushed as &quot;traditional&quot; is made-up, reactionary BS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, veganrampage; I too attended a women&#8217;s college with a history of tenuring known sexual harassers and worse.  I just read my alma mater&#8217;s annual report, and was disgusted, though not particularly surprised, to see a large photograph of one such prof who recently started a scholarship fund.  It would be nice to think that this is some sort of attempt to make up for his revolting past behavior, but somehow, I doubt it.  </p>
<p>Re: wedding dresses &#8212; when my folks got married (early sixties) it was not unusual for the woman to wear a suit instead of a big, gauzy Bridezilla dress.  And that was not exactly a right-thinking era.  When will some women get a clue that what&#8217;s being pushed as &#8220;traditional&#8221; is made-up, reactionary BS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allhellsloose</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/04/04/the-case-for-flip-flops-and-flowing-robes/#comment-161200</link>
		<dc:creator>allhellsloose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3551#comment-161200</guid>
		<description>Pregnant and high heels but why? So to conform to what?  High heels are an invention.

And older member of the community was wrong to just mention the fetus but use a bit of common sense!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pregnant and high heels but why? So to conform to what?  High heels are an invention.</p>
<p>And older member of the community was wrong to just mention the fetus but use a bit of common sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

