<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At Last! The End of Science Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: liberality</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165798</link>
		<dc:creator>liberality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165798</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;all the patriarchy can give anyone is cannibalistic religious practices that always end in torture and death&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

Exactly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b>all the patriarchy can give anyone is cannibalistic religious practices that always end in torture and death</b></i></p>
<p>Exactly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ma'Whis'Ki</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165590</link>
		<dc:creator>Ma'Whis'Ki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165590</guid>
		<description>Only in the patriarchy is the size of a clitoris an issue, as in &#039;only men may have genital protrusions&#039;. This is part of the agenda that fuels the predations of (name the demon accurately) Sado-sexual Butcher Poppas, who is no healer, and who should have his license to practice &#039;medicine&#039; revoked, tied to a railroad spike and rammed forcibly through his left temple. Once his &#039;big head&#039; has been taken care of, his &#039;little head&#039; (and his aptly-named &#039;nuts&#039;) should be removed with a labrys, nail-gunned to a piece of drywall and prominently displayed in honor of Art Week. People viewing the meat-collage would, of course, be invited to stimulate the remains with tazers to see if Butcher-Boy could feel anything.

What I am doing here is a Spinster-Reversal: the little girls he mutilates and then molests are &#039;nothing but meat&#039; to patriarchal necrophiliacs, and to answer a question posed in the Art Week thread, all the passive, naked femaleness so beloved of patriarchal art is on the order of pictures of steaks displayed in a restaurant menu. Patriarchy erases women by cutting them up into bits (Jack the Ripper and Butcher Poppas have loads in common) and eating them... This is my body, this is my blood.

While life may occasionally give us lemons (which make tasty Lemon-Cake-Top Pudding, among other good things), all the patriarchy can give anyone is cannibalistic religious practices that always end in torture and death. The demons of patriarchy have no life-force of their own, which is why they want ours, and their sexual pleasures are poor and fleeting, which is why they begrudge us ours. The girls &#039;doctored&#039; by Butcher Poppas are hated and tortured even as they are greedily castrated and consumed, but of course the dutifully zombified dead and properly patriarchal parents of the girls think that the issue *is* actually the size of a five-year-old girl&#039;s clitoris...

I recommend everyone re-read Gyn/Ecology by Mary Daly!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only in the patriarchy is the size of a clitoris an issue, as in &#8216;only men may have genital protrusions&#8217;. This is part of the agenda that fuels the predations of (name the demon accurately) Sado-sexual Butcher Poppas, who is no healer, and who should have his license to practice &#8216;medicine&#8217; revoked, tied to a railroad spike and rammed forcibly through his left temple. Once his &#8216;big head&#8217; has been taken care of, his &#8216;little head&#8217; (and his aptly-named &#8216;nuts&#8217;) should be removed with a labrys, nail-gunned to a piece of drywall and prominently displayed in honor of Art Week. People viewing the meat-collage would, of course, be invited to stimulate the remains with tazers to see if Butcher-Boy could feel anything.</p>
<p>What I am doing here is a Spinster-Reversal: the little girls he mutilates and then molests are &#8216;nothing but meat&#8217; to patriarchal necrophiliacs, and to answer a question posed in the Art Week thread, all the passive, naked femaleness so beloved of patriarchal art is on the order of pictures of steaks displayed in a restaurant menu. Patriarchy erases women by cutting them up into bits (Jack the Ripper and Butcher Poppas have loads in common) and eating them&#8230; This is my body, this is my blood.</p>
<p>While life may occasionally give us lemons (which make tasty Lemon-Cake-Top Pudding, among other good things), all the patriarchy can give anyone is cannibalistic religious practices that always end in torture and death. The demons of patriarchy have no life-force of their own, which is why they want ours, and their sexual pleasures are poor and fleeting, which is why they begrudge us ours. The girls &#8216;doctored&#8217; by Butcher Poppas are hated and tortured even as they are greedily castrated and consumed, but of course the dutifully zombified dead and properly patriarchal parents of the girls think that the issue *is* actually the size of a five-year-old girl&#8217;s clitoris&#8230;</p>
<p>I recommend everyone re-read Gyn/Ecology by Mary Daly!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SethraK</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165567</link>
		<dc:creator>SethraK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165567</guid>
		<description>Twisty, would you mind a link to the thread where you bring up cyborg incubators. It&#039;s a topic I&#039;m very interested in, although agree with above blamers who feel that in a pre-feminist revolution wqorld, it&#039;s rife with problems.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twisty, would you mind a link to the thread where you bring up cyborg incubators. It&#8217;s a topic I&#8217;m very interested in, although agree with above blamers who feel that in a pre-feminist revolution wqorld, it&#8217;s rife with problems.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agasaya</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165563</link>
		<dc:creator>agasaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165563</guid>
		<description>Jill, 

Isn&#039;t the purpose of revolution to offer biological freedom to women?  Apart from the fact that women choosing to raise kids get to educate them in gender equality issues (kids &#039;produced&#039; or adopted by heterosexual women or lesbian/trans gender couples) . That&#039;s revolutionary too.

Choosing to have kids is choosing to have significant restrictions upon your lifestyle, not about sacrificing your life. Childless women are forced to sacrifice their lives to the P every day of the week and twice on Sundays. 

Of course, this lousy environment so profitable to the P produces millions of learning impaired kids (one in six) and kids with chronic health problems (one in four).  

The cure for lack of medical care (defective as it may be)? One group, IBIS, says we should make birth control pills non-prescription, OTC drugs. Why not mandate free reproductive health visits instead, just as kids can have free immunizations at local health departments around the country?

Men can buy OTC hormone pills for girls and unwilling adult partners  without unwanted pregnancies bringing those abused females to the attention of health care providers. But OTC pills mean big profits for the drug companies with women buying their products regardless of medical contraindications.  And who&#039;ll look for STDs which are a huge threat to health?

Condoms are also OTC - now as a matter of fact.

See this: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/opinion/22blanchard.html?th&amp;emc=th</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the purpose of revolution to offer biological freedom to women?  Apart from the fact that women choosing to raise kids get to educate them in gender equality issues (kids &#8216;produced&#8217; or adopted by heterosexual women or lesbian/trans gender couples) . That&#8217;s revolutionary too.</p>
<p>Choosing to have kids is choosing to have significant restrictions upon your lifestyle, not about sacrificing your life. Childless women are forced to sacrifice their lives to the P every day of the week and twice on Sundays. </p>
<p>Of course, this lousy environment so profitable to the P produces millions of learning impaired kids (one in six) and kids with chronic health problems (one in four).  </p>
<p>The cure for lack of medical care (defective as it may be)? One group, IBIS, says we should make birth control pills non-prescription, OTC drugs. Why not mandate free reproductive health visits instead, just as kids can have free immunizations at local health departments around the country?</p>
<p>Men can buy OTC hormone pills for girls and unwilling adult partners  without unwanted pregnancies bringing those abused females to the attention of health care providers. But OTC pills mean big profits for the drug companies with women buying their products regardless of medical contraindications.  And who&#8217;ll look for STDs which are a huge threat to health?</p>
<p>Condoms are also OTC &#8211; now as a matter of fact.</p>
<p>See this: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/opinion/22blanchard.html?th&amp;emc=th" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/opinion/22blanchard.html?th&amp;emc=th</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedgepig</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165550</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedgepig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165550</guid>
		<description>veganrampage, I love it when you let rip.

And isn&#039;t it great Science Week is finally over. It felt like about a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>veganrampage, I love it when you let rip.</p>
<p>And isn&#8217;t it great Science Week is finally over. It felt like about a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veganrampage</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165541</link>
		<dc:creator>veganrampage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165541</guid>
		<description>Fuck the establishment! 

Speaking of Erik Blair, there are a group of sickfucks who give out a prize each year to &quot;honor him.&quot;

It is called The Orwell Prize. 

How did these savage fucks manage to set up the funds for this prize? Part of the money was supplied by ripping off his long suffering widow, who starved to death with good ole George for most of his life, and they dare to brag about it on their site, under &quot;History of the Orwell Prize.&quot;

From the Orwell Prize web site:

&quot;When George Orwell began, only in the very last years of his life, to make money for the first time, he was generous to hard-up friends, to needy writers, poor poets and to small good causes of the old Left – a habit that his second wife and widow, the late Sonia Orwell, did not continue in quite the same way. Nonetheless, after his death, she said that she tore up between three and five thousand pounds&#039; worth of IOUs.

So when Bernard Crick entered into a contract with her and Secker &amp; Warburg in 1974 to write a life of Orwell, he thought it only right and proper to make an irrevocable grant that year (unknown to her) in trust, via Birkbeck College, of the English hardback volume rights.&quot;

&quot;Right and proper&quot; to set up an irrevocable trust without the knowledge and/or consent of the principal heir?  Fuck off and die Bernard Crick, fuck you and everybody that looks like you. I have a few different names for it; theft, fraud, grand larceny. You blamers can fill in the blanks where I was amiss.

Great way to honor Orwell, right? Perfecto, becasue Orwell loved &quot;The Man.&quot;

Fuck them all, every sickfuck one of them, including the FGM &quot;doctor&quot;, but dead and rotting in the grave is O, too good a fate by a factor of infinity. 

I suggest repeated near death stranglings, a popular torture method used by serial killers whose hobby is to impose maximum pain on women, before the requisite rape/kill/rape ending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck the establishment! </p>
<p>Speaking of Erik Blair, there are a group of sickfucks who give out a prize each year to &#8220;honor him.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is called The Orwell Prize. </p>
<p>How did these savage fucks manage to set up the funds for this prize? Part of the money was supplied by ripping off his long suffering widow, who starved to death with good ole George for most of his life, and they dare to brag about it on their site, under &#8220;History of the Orwell Prize.&#8221;</p>
<p>From the Orwell Prize web site:</p>
<p>&#8220;When George Orwell began, only in the very last years of his life, to make money for the first time, he was generous to hard-up friends, to needy writers, poor poets and to small good causes of the old Left – a habit that his second wife and widow, the late Sonia Orwell, did not continue in quite the same way. Nonetheless, after his death, she said that she tore up between three and five thousand pounds&#8217; worth of IOUs.</p>
<p>So when Bernard Crick entered into a contract with her and Secker &amp; Warburg in 1974 to write a life of Orwell, he thought it only right and proper to make an irrevocable grant that year (unknown to her) in trust, via Birkbeck College, of the English hardback volume rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Right and proper&#8221; to set up an irrevocable trust without the knowledge and/or consent of the principal heir?  Fuck off and die Bernard Crick, fuck you and everybody that looks like you. I have a few different names for it; theft, fraud, grand larceny. You blamers can fill in the blanks where I was amiss.</p>
<p>Great way to honor Orwell, right? Perfecto, becasue Orwell loved &#8220;The Man.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fuck them all, every sickfuck one of them, including the FGM &#8220;doctor&#8221;, but dead and rotting in the grave is O, too good a fate by a factor of infinity. </p>
<p>I suggest repeated near death stranglings, a popular torture method used by serial killers whose hobby is to impose maximum pain on women, before the requisite rape/kill/rape ending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezebella</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165528</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezebella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165528</guid>
		<description>Indeed, Jeff, using animals to incubate human fetii would be a deplorable development.

And Niki, amen!  As a person who has chosen not to make another human being inside my own personal uterus, I don&#039;t particularly want to given child-care duties on account of someone *else* has decided to make one, or ten, or nineteen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Jeff, using animals to incubate human fetii would be a deplorable development.</p>
<p>And Niki, amen!  As a person who has chosen not to make another human being inside my own personal uterus, I don&#8217;t particularly want to given child-care duties on account of someone *else* has decided to make one, or ten, or nineteen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mearl</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165519</link>
		<dc:creator>mearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165519</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else hear Dworkin and MacKinnon echoing in their head while reading about a doctor who mutilates the clitorises of female children for money and whose &quot;follow-up&quot; includes using vibrators on same? Is it really all that off the mark to think the guy is more than likely a sick sadistic fuck who likes diddling children and has found a way to legitimise and get away with both hobbies with his status and credentials? I can&#039;t tell you how physically ill the thought of what those girls were (and forever will be) forced to go through made me.

I know it&#039;s been said about a hundred times already, but intuition is pretty much the brain&#039;s ability to take information the conscious mind is not registering or is rejecting, and process it at lightning speed. As for scientific method: Rugosa bangs it on the head. The scientific method and the process of logic both came out of the self-same human brains that employ intuition all day every day. It&#039;s just a formalised, externalised way of trying to prove your hunches.

Any dude who tries to pull the &quot;You&#039;re illogical, men are more rational, your lady-brain isn&#039;t wired for logic&quot; shite on me has always had the privilege of experiencing the joy of losing several theoretical arguments to my silly lady-brain before he runs away in shame. Problem is, the next move (as is expected) is that the dude gets mad at being emasculated and refuses to admit that women can do logic better than he can. Hurt pride = heel-digging. I become the scary bitch, am summarily dismissed, and off goes the dude to get his ego shored up by someone who doesn&#039;t have the chops to win his little power-game plays. That is, of course, until the next female someone gets less naive. Amazing how so many irrational women without formal education and dudely training can still argue perfectly logical points to a blithering, red-faced &quot;logical&quot; dude.

I&#039;d say that one of the major reasons men seem to think women aren&#039;t capable of rational thinking is that they tend to avoid women who are good at it. Or they bark over top of the women they&#039;re arguing with as if they&#039;re on &quot;Politically Incorrect.&quot; Because they hate losing arguments. Sort of like how men claim that females &quot;naturally&quot; look a certain way and that&#039;s why they find heteronormative/femininity-adherent/under-25 females so attractive. All the while it&#039;s basically just that men don&#039;t pay attention to the millions of women who don&#039;t conform to their socialised and acculturated standard of what &quot;female&quot; looks like.

Almost every day I read or hear something that makes me just want to give up doing anything else and walk around saying, &quot;Duuuuhhhhhhhh.&quot; So I come to read this blog and the comments of the Blametariet. This blog always stops me from reaching for my housecoat and my gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else hear Dworkin and MacKinnon echoing in their head while reading about a doctor who mutilates the clitorises of female children for money and whose &#8220;follow-up&#8221; includes using vibrators on same? Is it really all that off the mark to think the guy is more than likely a sick sadistic fuck who likes diddling children and has found a way to legitimise and get away with both hobbies with his status and credentials? I can&#8217;t tell you how physically ill the thought of what those girls were (and forever will be) forced to go through made me.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s been said about a hundred times already, but intuition is pretty much the brain&#8217;s ability to take information the conscious mind is not registering or is rejecting, and process it at lightning speed. As for scientific method: Rugosa bangs it on the head. The scientific method and the process of logic both came out of the self-same human brains that employ intuition all day every day. It&#8217;s just a formalised, externalised way of trying to prove your hunches.</p>
<p>Any dude who tries to pull the &#8220;You&#8217;re illogical, men are more rational, your lady-brain isn&#8217;t wired for logic&#8221; shite on me has always had the privilege of experiencing the joy of losing several theoretical arguments to my silly lady-brain before he runs away in shame. Problem is, the next move (as is expected) is that the dude gets mad at being emasculated and refuses to admit that women can do logic better than he can. Hurt pride = heel-digging. I become the scary bitch, am summarily dismissed, and off goes the dude to get his ego shored up by someone who doesn&#8217;t have the chops to win his little power-game plays. That is, of course, until the next female someone gets less naive. Amazing how so many irrational women without formal education and dudely training can still argue perfectly logical points to a blithering, red-faced &#8220;logical&#8221; dude.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that one of the major reasons men seem to think women aren&#8217;t capable of rational thinking is that they tend to avoid women who are good at it. Or they bark over top of the women they&#8217;re arguing with as if they&#8217;re on &#8220;Politically Incorrect.&#8221; Because they hate losing arguments. Sort of like how men claim that females &#8220;naturally&#8221; look a certain way and that&#8217;s why they find heteronormative/femininity-adherent/under-25 females so attractive. All the while it&#8217;s basically just that men don&#8217;t pay attention to the millions of women who don&#8217;t conform to their socialised and acculturated standard of what &#8220;female&#8221; looks like.</p>
<p>Almost every day I read or hear something that makes me just want to give up doing anything else and walk around saying, &#8220;Duuuuhhhhhhhh.&#8221; So I come to read this blog and the comments of the Blametariet. This blog always stops me from reaching for my housecoat and my gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yttik</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165479</link>
		<dc:creator>yttik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165479</guid>
		<description>Ha! I am cryin&#039; to just about anybody who will listen because I figure I&#039;m owed about 250 grand, 4 times over, plus interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I am cryin&#8217; to just about anybody who will listen because I figure I&#8217;m owed about 250 grand, 4 times over, plus interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2010/06/18/at-last-the-end-of-science-week/#comment-165443</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/?p=3916#comment-165443</guid>
		<description>

&lt;blockquote&gt;a wonderful, pleasurable life experience surpassing even a long weekend of tacos and tequila&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Incubate away, Shelby old pal. Incubate away. But when feminist revolt fails to bring about the permanent dissolution of patriarchy on accounta women have not liberated themselves from the tyranny of wonderful, pleasurable biology, don&#039;t come cryin&#039; to &lt;em&gt;me&lt;/em&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>a wonderful, pleasurable life experience surpassing even a long weekend of tacos and tequila</p></blockquote>
<p>Incubate away, Shelby old pal. Incubate away. But when feminist revolt fails to bring about the permanent dissolution of patriarchy on accounta women have not liberated themselves from the tyranny of wonderful, pleasurable biology, don&#8217;t come cryin&#8217; to <em>me</em>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

